KOMP vs TEKX: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

KOMPANYSE Arca

State Street Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF

TEKXCNasdaq

Overlap

4.0%by weight

Expense ratio

KOMP −0.45pt a year

KOMP0.20%TEKX0.65%

Avg volume · 30D

KOMP 17.6×the volume

KOMP70KTEKX3.97K

KOMP vs TEKX Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−1.6%KOMP+7.8%TEKX

Expense ratio: KOMP 0.20%, better; TEKX 0.65%
Fund size: KOMP $2.57B; TEKX $13M
1Y total return: KOMP −1.6%; TEKX +7.8%, better
Yield (12M): KOMP 1.63%, better; TEKX 0.30%
Holdings: KOMP 501; TEKX 35
Avg volume (30D): KOMP 70K sh, better; TEKX 3.97K sh
NAV per share: KOMP $64.63; TEKX $50.90
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for KOMP, TEKX, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	KOMP	TEKX
Cost30% weight	A100Higher	C53
Mission25% weight	Not scored	Not scored
Risk15% weight	B55Higher	D28
Tradability15% weight	A77Higher	D33
Holdings10% weight	A88Higher	D32
Durability5% weight	A88Higher	D36

Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. KOMP and TEKX are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Disruptive Innovation⁠

Category · 30 funds

See all 30 ›

KOMP ranks 2nd and TEKX 21st of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.

Rank 1AXTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETFScore 86
Rank 2AKOMPState Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETFScore 83
Rank 3ATRFMAAM Transformers ETFScore 74
Rank 21CSOCLGlobal X Social Media ETFScore 40
Rank 21CTEKXState Street Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETFScore 40
Rank 23DDARPTidal Trust II Grizzle Growth ETFScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

KOMPAState Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

TEKXCState Street Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF

In short

KOMP Most thematic funds bet on one idea. KOMP buys the whole Fourth Industrial Revolution: 20-plus Kensho subsectors, from robotics to genetic engineering, spread across roughly 500 global stocks for 0.20% a year.

TEKX State Street handed the keys to Galaxy, a digital-asset specialist, and got back a concentrated active portfolio of roughly 30 names: the companies building the rails for crypto and other disruptive tech, not the tokens themselves.

Stated mandate

KOMP The Fund seeks investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index.

TEKX TEKX is an actively managed, high-conviction strategy investing in companies that power and enable disruptive technologies across the digital-asset and innovation landscape.

Why people hold it

KOMP 0.20% a year, under a third of the typical disruptive-innovation fund's fee and below peers like XT (0.46%) and TRFM (0.49%).
Kensho's language-processing engine scans regulatory filings for context and keywords, so membership rests on what a company discloses it does, not an old sector label.ssga.com spglobal.com
About 500 global names across 20-plus subsectors, equal weighted within each group with extra weight to 'core' operators. One mega-cap can't run the show.spglobal.com
Trading since 2018 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, it sits among the strongest implementations in the disruptive-innovation group.

TEKX The picks-and-shovels angle on digital assets. It buys the companies that power and enable disruptive technology across the crypto and innovation landscape, so exposure comes through operating businesses.
Actively managed and high-conviction: roughly 30 names, not a 200-stock index sprawl. Every position has to earn its slot, and the manager can move as the theme shifts.
The 0.65% expense ratio sits right at the median for disruptive-innovation funds, so you are paying the going rate for active management rather than an active premium.

Worth knowing

KOMP Equal weighting reaches down into smaller, earlier-stage innovators, so swings run wider than a plain broad-market index fund.spglobal.com
Subsector weights follow a risk-adjusted-return formula with annual reconstitution, so the mix drifts toward industries that have recently performed well.ssga.com spglobal.com
Breadth cuts both ways: a pure play on one theme like AI or space gets diluted here across the entire innovation map.spglobal.com

TEKX A 2024 launch that is still small and thinly traded. Wider spreads are common in funds like this, and limit orders matter more than they would in a household-name ETF.
Around 30 stocks in one of the market's most volatile themes means single names can swing the whole fund. Concentration cuts both directions.
Index-tracking peers cost less: KOMP runs 0.20% and XT 0.46%. Broad passive baskets are the cheaper way to own this theme if you do not want a manager picking.

Full KOMP profile⁠

Full TEKX profile⁠

KOMP vs TEKX Holdings

How KOMP and TEKX differ

Overlap by weight

4.0%

Shared holdings make up 64.2% of TEKX and 4.0% of KOMP.

Level by level

Holdings18 in both4.0%
Sector10 Sectors67.5%
Countryby domicile88.9%
Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in KOMP and TEKX, widest gap first
Sector	More in KOMPMore in TEKX	KOMP	TEKX
Financials	TEKX +20.1 points	4.2%	24.3%
Health Care	KOMP +15.2 points	15.2%	0.0%
Technology	TEKX +8.6 points	39.5%	48.1%
Consumer Discretionary	KOMP +5.5 points	5.5%	0.0%
Industrials	KOMP +5.0 points	22.9%	17.9%
Communication	KOMP +4.6 points	4.6%	0.0%
Energy	TEKX +2.5 points	1.5%	4.0%
Utilities	KOMP +1.6 points	3.0%	1.4%
Materials	TEKX +1.2 points	3.1%	4.3%
Consumer Staples	KOMP +0.6 points	0.6%	0.0%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in KOMP and TEKX, widest gap first
Country	More in KOMPMore in TEKX	KOMP	TEKX
Germany	TEKX +4.6 points	0.0%	4.6%
China	KOMP +3.5 points	3.5%	0.0%
Israel	KOMP +2.5 points	2.5%	0.0%
Australia	TEKX +2.0 points	0.2%	2.2%
Taiwan	TEKX +1.9 points	1.0%	2.9%
Canada	KOMP +1.7 points	1.7%	0.0%
France	TEKX +1.1 points	0.0%	1.1%
United States	TEKX +0.9 points	87.2%	88.1%
Other countries (13)	KOMP +2.8 points	4.0%	1.2%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

KOMP11.1%
TEKX59.2%

Securities held

KOMP498
TEKX33

Asset class

KOMP: Equity
TEKX: Equity

Holdings

Only in KOMP480
In both18
Only in TEKX15

Only in KOMP

480 securities, 96.0% of KOMP by weight

Twist Bioscience Corp1.90%
Ptc Inc1.40%
3D Systems Corp1.18%
Bruker Corp1.12%
Elbit Systems Ltd1.10%
Unity Software Inc0.97%
Himax Technologies Inc Adr0.90%
Ambarella Inc0.88%
Tesla Inc0.81%
Aerovironment Inc0.81%
Ouster Inc0.77%
Meta Platforms Inc Class A0.71%
Stratasys Ltd0.70%
Teledyne Technologies Inc0.68%
Snap Inc A0.67%
Kopin Corp0.65%
Leidos Holdings Inc0.64%
Parsons Corp0.61%
Rockwell Automation Inc0.55%
Emerson Electric Co0.53%
Redwire Corp0.52%
Kla Corp0.52%
Vuzix Corp0.51%
Danaher Corp0.51%
Proto Labs Inc0.51%
Northrop Grumman Corp0.51%
Atlassian Corp Class A0.50%
Alarm.com Holdings Inc0.50%
Adt Inc0.50%
Generac Holdings Inc0.49%
Hp Inc0.49%
Intuitive Surgical Inc0.49%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc0.49%
On Semiconductor0.48%
Ondas Inc0.48%
Iridium Communications Inc0.47%
Lockheed Martin Corp0.47%
Unusual Machines Inc /Us0.47%
Cabot Corp0.46%
Cognex Corp0.46%
Ameresco Inc Class A0.45%
Autodesk Inc0.45%
Oceaneering Intl Inc0.45%
Heico Corp0.45%
Nve Corp0.44%
Zebra Technologies Corp Class A0.43%
Viasat Inc0.42%
Novanta Inc0.42%
Forum Energy Technologies In0.40%
Moderna Inc0.40%

Only in TEKX

15 securities, 35.8% of TEKX by weight

Hubbell Inc5.08%
Siemens Energy AG4.56%
Freeport Mcmoran Inc4.08%
Applied Digital Corp3.92%
Taiwan Semiconductor Sp Adr2.88%
Exxonmobil Holdings Corp2.80%
Terawulf Inc2.77%
Forgent Power Solutions Class A1.91%
Powell Industries Inc1.50%
Entergy Corp1.34%
Nvent Electric PLC1.15%
Target Hospitality Corp1.07%
Boost Run Inc Class A0.96%
Vertiv Holdings Co A0.93%
Lam Research Corp0.86%

Weight gaps

All 18 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in KOMP and TEKX, widest gap first
Holding	More in KOMPMore in TEKX	KOMP	TEKX
Riot Platforms IncRIOT	TEKX +11.65 points	0.17%	11.82%
Keel Infrastructure CorpKEEL	TEKX +7.56 points	0.15%	7.71%
Microsoft CorpMSFT	TEKX +6.06 points	0.24%	6.30%
NVIDIA CorpNVDA	TEKX +5.64 points	0.80%	6.44%
Cleanspark IncCLSK	TEKX +4.56 points	0.17%	4.73%
Cipher Digital IncCIFR	TEKX +4.48 points	0.12%	4.60%
Robinhood Markets Inc AHOOD	TEKX +3.61 points	0.04%	3.65%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc ACRWD	TEKX +3.33 points	0.27%	3.60%
Amphenol Corp Class AAPH	TEKX +2.54 points	0.20%	2.74%
Flowserve CorpFLS	TEKX +2.05 points	0.26%	2.31%
Iren LtdIREN	TEKX +2.02 points	0.17%	2.19%
Micron Technology IncMU	TEKX +1.88 points	0.46%	2.34%
Palo Alto Networks IncPANW	TEKX +1.00 points	0.24%	1.24%
Suncor Energy IncSU	TEKX +0.94 points	0.11%	1.05%
Core Scientific IncCORZ	TEKX +0.70 points	0.17%	0.87%
Visa Inc Class A SharesV	TEKX +0.70 points	0.04%	0.74%
Mastercard Inc AMA	TEKX +0.67 points	0.06%	0.73%
Coherent CorpCOHR	TEKX +0.63 points	0.22%	0.85%

All 499 KOMP holdings⁠All 29 TEKX holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

KOMP vs TEKX Cost

Overpaying TEKX vs KOMP

$8,562

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

KOMP 0.20%
$4,155
TEKX 0.65%
$12,717

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

KOMP 0.20%
TEKX 0.65%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	KOMP	TEKX	Overpaying
10	$365	$1,163	$798
20	$1,421	$4,440	$3,019
30	$4,155	$12,717	$8,562

Expense ratio

0.20%KOMP, cheaper
0.65%TEKX

KOMP0.20%TEKX0.65%

0.20%0.90%

Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
Median 0.65%

KOMP cheapest of 30 funds

TEKX 12th cheapest of 30 funds

KOMP vs TEKX Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026

Yield (12M): KOMP 1.63%, better; TEKX 0.30%
Payout (12M): KOMP $1.02; TEKX $0.14
Last payment: KOMP $0.13; TEKX $0.14
Ex-dividend: KOMP Sep 21, 2026; TEKX Dec 29, 2025
Paid on: KOMP Sep 23, 2026; TEKX Dec 31, 2025
Frequency: KOMP Quarterly; TEKX Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

KOMPQuarterly · 33 paymentsAll KOMP payments⁠

TEKXAnnual · 2 paymentsAll TEKX payments⁠

KOMP vs TEKX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: KOMP 22.3%TEKX 50.4%since Oct 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: KOMP 0.76TEKX 0.67since Oct 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: KOMP −45.4%TEKX −45.5%since Sep 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: KOMP 1.65TEKX 3.10; Market = 1

KOMP and TEKX in the news

All news⁠

New ETFs
Tuttle's GANZ looks for a theme's suppliers, but its own rule gives them the smaller share
Oct 27, 2026KOMP
Deep Dive
Disruptive innovation ETFs share a label, not a portfolio
Sep 11, 2026KOMP

Popular comparisons

KOMPAvsXTA
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF · iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
Expense ratio
0.20% · 0.46%
Category
TEKXCvsXTA
State Street Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF · iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
Expense ratio
0.65% · 0.46%
Category
KOMPAvsTRFMA
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF · AAM Transformers ETF
Expense ratio
0.20% · 0.49%
Category
TEKXCvsTRFMA
State Street Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF · AAM Transformers ETF
Expense ratio
0.65% · 0.49%
Category
KOMPAvsXITKA
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF · State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF
Expense ratio
0.20% · 0.45%
Category
TEKXCvsXITKA
State Street Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF · State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF
Expense ratio
0.65% · 0.45%
Category

KOMP vs TEKX

In short

Stated mandate

Why people hold it

Worth knowing

How KOMP and TEKX differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in KOMP

Only in TEKX

Weight gaps

Cost over time

Year by year

Distribution history

Fall from peak · 5 years

Risk facts

Tuttle's GANZ looks for a theme's suppliers, but its own rule gives them the smaller share

Disruptive innovation ETFs share a label, not a portfolio

How KOMP and TEKX differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in KOMP

Only in TEKX

Weight gaps