SCHQ ranks 2nd and LFDR 6th of 6 funds in the Treasuries (10-20 Year) Category.
LFDR vs SCHQ
SCHQ −0.22pt a year
0.25%0.03%
SCHQ 10594.4×the volume
1021.08M
LFDR vs SCHQ Performance
−3.0%−2.9%
- LFDR 0.25%
- SCHQ 0.03%, better
- LFDR $1M
- SCHQ $932M
- LFDR −5.3%
- SCHQ −4.3%, better
- LFDR 5.70%, better
- SCHQ 4.86%
- LFDR 17
- SCHQ 102
- LFDR 102 sh
- SCHQ 1.08M sh, better
- LFDR $176.25
- SCHQ $29.81
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LFDR | SCHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F13 | A84Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | D36 | D39Higher |
| Tradability | D38 | B59Higher |
| Holdings | C49 | A75Higher |
| Durability | F15 | C53Higher |
Rank among Treasuries (10-20 Year) funds
Same Category. LFDR and SCHQ are both graded against the same 6 Treasuries (10-20 Year) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LFDRC
SCHQA
In short
SCHQ The long end of the Treasury curve in a three-basis-point wrapper. SCHQ owns only long-dated US government bonds, so interest rates are the whole story here: no credit calls, no stock picking, just duration.
Stated mandate
SCHQ The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index representing the long-term U.S. Treasury bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LFDR vs SCHQ Holdings
How LFDR and SCHQ differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
Sector
No Sector split for LFDR and SCHQ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in LFDRMore in SCHQ | LFDR | SCHQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- LFDR95.6%
- SCHQ20.8%
- LFDR16
- SCHQ102
Asset class
- LFDR
- Fixed Income
- SCHQ
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. LFDR holds 16 securities, SCHQ 102.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LFDR vs SCHQ Cost
Overpaying LFDR vs SCHQ
$4,521
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LFDR 0.25%
$5,159
SCHQ 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LFDR | SCHQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $55 | $400 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $216 | $1,553 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $638 | $4,521 |
- 0.25%LFDR
- 0.03%SCHQ, cheaper
- Middle half of Treasuries (10-20 Year) funds
- Median 0.10%
SCHQ cheapest of 6 funds
LFDR 6th cheapest of 6 funds
LFDR vs SCHQ Dividends
- LFDR 5.70%, better
- SCHQ 4.86%
- LFDR $10.00
- SCHQ $1.45
- LFDR $0.83
- SCHQ $0.11
- LFDR Oct 2, 2026
- SCHQ Oct 1, 2026
- LFDR Oct 5, 2026
- SCHQ Oct 7, 2026
- LFDR Monthly
- SCHQ Monthly
Distribution history
LFDR vs SCHQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LFDR 9.0%SCHQ 12.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- LFDR −0.42SCHQ 0.04
- Worst fall
- LFDR −11.1%SCHQ −40.9%
- Market sensitivity
- LFDR 0.04SCHQ 2.24
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.