PSR ranks 2nd and LFSC 7th of 35 funds in the US Active Sector Category.
LFSC vs PSR
PSR −0.19pt a year
0.54%0.35%
LFSC 2.9×the volume
4.16K1.45K
LFSC vs PSR Performance
+32.6%+13.9%
- LFSC 0.54%
- PSR 0.35%, better
- LFSC $122M
- PSR $57M
- LFSC +32.6%, better
- PSR +13.9%
- LFSC
- PSR 2.70%
- LFSC 38
- PSR 37
- LFSC 4.16K sh, better
- PSR 1.45K sh
- LFSC $43.63
- PSR $100.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LFSC | PSR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A76 | A85Higher |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | D32 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | B61Higher | B58 |
| Holdings | A71Higher | B66 |
| Durability | C41 | A75Higher |
Rank among US Active Sector funds
Same Category. LFSC and PSR are both graded against the same 35 US Active Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LFSCB
PSRA
In short
LFSC An actively managed swing at life sciences innovation, launched in 2024 and priced below the typical active US equity fund. Healthcare stock-picking in a single ticket, not a sector index.
PSR Active REIT stock-picking without the active price tag: since 2008, PSR has run a tight book of about 30 US property names for 0.35% a year, roughly half the median fee among active US equity ETFs.
Stated mandate
LFSC The fund is intended to provide exposure to the healthcare sector, primarily through the F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF.
PSR The Fund seeks high total return through capital appreciation and current income, investing principally in equity real estate investment trusts.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LFSC vs PSR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LFSC vs PSR Cost
Overpaying LFSC vs PSR
$3,594
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LFSC 0.54%
$10,720
PSR 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LFSC | PSR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $971 | $634 | $337 |
| 20 | $3,724 | $2,454 | $1,270 |
| 30 | $10,720 | $7,126 | $3,594 |
- 0.54%LFSC
- 0.35%PSR, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Sector funds
- Median 0.61%
PSR 6th cheapest of 35 funds
LFSC 9th cheapest of 35 funds
LFSC vs PSR Dividends
- LFSC
- PSR 2.70%
- LFSC None
- PSR $2.72
- LFSC
- PSR $0.67
- LFSC
- PSR Sep 21, 2026
- LFSC
- PSR Sep 25, 2026
- LFSC
- PSR Quarterly
Distribution history
LFSC vs PSR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LFSC 25.9%PSR 16.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- LFSC 1.06PSR 0.54
- Worst fall
- LFSC −29.7%PSR −34.8%
- Market sensitivity
- LFSC 0.94PSR 0.95
Popular comparisons
- 0.54% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.54% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.54% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.