Skip to content
etf.net

LFSC vs TRUT

F/M Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF

LFSCBNasdaq

VanEck Technology TruSector ETF

TRUTANasdaq

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

TRUT −0.40pt a year

LFSC0.54%TRUT0.14%

Avg volume · 30D

TRUT 43.8×the volume

LFSC4.16KTRUT182K

LFSC vs TRUT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+32.6%LFSC+12.7%TRUT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. LFSC +32.6%. TRUT +12.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
LFSC 0.54%
TRUT 0.14%, better
Fund size
LFSC $122M
TRUT $238M
1Y total return
LFSC +32.6%, better
TRUT +12.7%
Yield (12M)
LFSC No data
TRUT 0.35%
Holdings
LFSC 38
TRUT 77
Avg volume (30D)
LFSC 4.16K sh
TRUT 182K sh, better
NAV per share
LFSC $43.63
TRUT $31.15
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LFSC: Cost 76, Risk 32, Mission 84, Tradability 61, Holdings 71, Durability 41. TRUT: Cost 93, Risk 23, Mission not scored, Tradability 96, Holdings 31, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for LFSC, TRUT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLFSCTRUT
Cost30% weightA76A93Higher
Mission25% weightA84Not scored
Risk15% weightD32HigherF23
Tradability15% weightB61A96Higher
Holdings10% weightA71HigherD31
Durability5% weightC41B61Higher

Rank among US Active Sector funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LFSC and TRUT are both graded against the same 35 US Active Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Sector⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

TRUT ranks 4th and LFSC 7th of 35 funds in the US Active Sector Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVREAvantis Real Estate ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2APSRInvesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 2BTMEDT. Rowe Price Health Care ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4ATRUTVanEck Technology TruSector ETFScore 69
  5. Rank 5BUTESVirtus Reaves Utilities ETFScore 66
  6. Rank 7BBMEDiShares Health Innovation Active ETFScore 61
  7. Rank 7BLFSCF/M Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETFScore 61
  8. Rank 9BFPROFidelity Real Estate Investment ETFScore 58

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LFSCBF/M Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF

TRUTAVanEck Technology TruSector ETF

In short

LFSC An actively managed swing at life sciences innovation, launched in 2024 and priced below the typical active US equity fund. Healthcare stock-picking in a single ticket, not a sector index.

TRUT Diversification rules force most tech ETFs to trim their biggest names. TRUT's answer: own the giants directly up to the legal line, then top up with sector ETFs so the portfolio mirrors the sector's real shape.

Stated mandate

LFSC The fund is intended to provide exposure to the healthcare sector, primarily through the F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF.

TRUT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through active investment in securities of information technology-related companies or instruments providing exposure to them.

Why people hold it

  • LFSC 0.54% buys active healthcare management for less than the median active US equity fund charges, so the stock-picking doesn't start in a fee hole.
  • The portfolio sticks closely to the healthcare mandate in its filings. What the documents describe is what shows up in the holdings.
  • One ticket for a specialist life sciences sleeve run by a manager making calls, rather than a rules-based sector index rebalancing on a calendar.
  • TRUT The mechanism is the point. Fund rules cap one stock at 25% and stocks above 5% at 50% combined; TRUT fills the gap with targeted sector ETFs instead of overweighting smaller names.vaneck.comvaneck.com 2
  • 0.14% a year for an actively managed fund, against a median near 0.65% across active US equity peers. Cheap enough to sit alongside index products.
  • One of the two originals in VanEck's TruSector line, launched in 2025. The approach has since been extended across all 11 GICS sectors.vaneck.comvaneck.com 2
  • About 80 positions, quarterly distributions, and steady day-to-day trading. On cost and tradability it lands in the upper tier of its active US equity cohort.

Worth knowing

  • LFSC Thinly traded, with a modest asset base. Spreads can run wider than on giant sector funds, which makes limit orders and quiet mid-session windows worth the attention.
  • Launched in October 2024, so the track record is short and any read on its risk behavior rests on limited history.
  • This is a total-return vehicle, not an income one. It has not been paying distributions.
  • TRUT Part of the exposure arrives through other ETFs rather than shares the fund holds outright. That is the workaround that makes uncapped weights possible, and it adds a layer.vaneck.com
  • Uncapped means concentrated. Leaning fully into tech's largest companies ties results to a handful of mega-caps more tightly than a capped sector fund would.vaneck.com
  • Launched August 2025, so there is only a short record of how closely the hybrid build actually shadows an uncapped tech benchmark.

Full LFSC profile⁠

Full TRUT profile⁠

LFSC vs TRUT Holdings

How LFSC and TRUT differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of LFSC and 0.0% of TRUT.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile99.6%

Sector

No Sector split for LFSC and TRUT.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in LFSC and TRUT, widest gap first
CountryMore in LFSCMore in TRUT
United StatesLFSC +0.4 points
ChinaTRUT +0.3 points
MexicoTRUT +0.1 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • LFSC54.8%
  • TRUT86.5%

Securities held

  • LFSC38
  • TRUT76

Asset class

LFSC
Equity
TRUT
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in LFSC38
  • In both0
  • Only in TRUT76

Only in LFSC

38 securities, 100% of LFSC by weight

  • Replimune Group Inc8.66%
  • LivaNova PLC6.87%
  • Cogent Biosciences Inc6.04%

Only in TRUT

76 securities, 100% of TRUT by weight

  • Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund30.70%
  • Nvidia Corp15.65%
  • Apple Inc15.40%

Weight gaps

LFSC and TRUT share no securities.

All LFSC holdings⁠All 75 TRUT holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LFSC vs TRUT Cost

Overpaying LFSC vs TRUT

$7,788

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LFSC 0.54%

    $10,720

  • TRUT 0.14%

    $2,932

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LFSC 0.54%
  • TRUT 0.14%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530LFSC $10,720TRUT $2,932

Year by year

YearLFSCTRUTOverpaying
10$971$256$715
20$3,724$1,000$2,724
30$10,720$2,932$7,788

Expense ratio

  • 0.54%LFSC
  • 0.14%TRUT, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Sector funds
  • Median 0.61%

TRUT 3rd cheapest of 35 funds

LFSC 9th cheapest of 35 funds

LFSC vs TRUT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
LFSC No data
TRUT 0.35%
Payout (12M)
LFSC None
TRUT $0.11
Last payment
LFSC No data
TRUT $0.03
Ex-dividend
LFSC No data
TRUT Oct 1, 2026
Paid on
LFSC No data
TRUT Oct 6, 2026
Frequency
LFSC No data
TRUT Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

LFSCAll LFSC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

TRUTQuarterly · 5 paymentsAll TRUT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Oct 1, 2025 $0.01; Dec 29, 2025 $0.02; Apr 1, 2026 $0.03; Jul 1, 2026 $0.03; Oct 1, 2026 $0.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.032026YTD

LFSC vs TRUT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LFSC 25.9%since Nov 2024TRUT 26.8%since Sep 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LFSC 1.06since Nov 2024TRUT 0.78since Sep 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LFSC −29.7%since Oct 2024TRUT −18.6%since Aug 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LFSC 0.94TRUT 1.76

Popular comparisons

  • LFSCBvsAVREA

    F/M Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.54% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TRUTAvsAVREA

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LFSCBvsPSRA

    F/M Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.54% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TRUTAvsPSRA

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LFSCBvsTMEDB

    F/M Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF · T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.54% · 0.44%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TRUTAvsTMEDB

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.44%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.