Skip to content
etf.net

LGDS vs LRGC

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Growth ETF

LGDSBNasdaq

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

LRGCANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

LRGC −0.01pt a year

LGDS0.40%LRGC0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

LGDS 1.3×the volume

LGDS43.1KLRGC33.3K

LGDS vs LRGC Performance

Aug 5, 2026 – Nov 5, 2026

−11.4%LGDS−4.9%LRGC

Aug 5, 2026 to Nov 5, 2026. LGDS −11.4%. LRGC −4.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−7.5%−2.5%0%2.5%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
LGDS 0.40%
LRGC 0.39%, better
Fund size
LGDS $1.04B
LRGC $1.38B
1Y total return
LGDS No data
LRGC +8.0%
Yield (12M)
LGDS No data
LRGC 0.54%
Holdings
LGDS 103
LRGC 72
Avg volume (30D)
LGDS 43.1K sh, better
LRGC 33.3K sh
NAV per share
LGDS $47.34
LRGC $86.52
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LGDS: Cost 82, Risk 50, Mission not scored, Tradability 52, Holdings 54, Durability 93. LRGC: Cost 82, Risk 91, Mission 80, Tradability 83, Holdings 76, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for LGDS, LRGC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLGDSLRGC
Cost30% weightA82A82
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightC50A91Higher
Tradability15% weightC52A83Higher
Holdings10% weightC54A76Higher
Durability5% weightA93HigherA79

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LGDS and LRGC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

LRGC ranks 3rd and LGDS 12th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 83
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 82
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 12BJGROJPMorgan Active Growth ETFScore 66
  6. Rank 12BLGDSJPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Growth ETFScore 66
  7. Rank 12BLRGEClearBridge Large Cap Growth Select ETFScore 66

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LGDSBJPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Growth ETF

LRGCAAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

In short

LGDS No data

LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.

Stated mandate

LGDS No data

LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.

Why people hold it

LGDS No data

  • LRGC Roughly 70 holdings against a 500-stock yardstick, with quality and value screens doing the filtering. Each name actually carries weight.
  • 0.39% a year sits below the median fee in its active large-cap group, so the manager isn't digging out of a deep cost hole.
  • One of the stronger implementations among the actively managed US large-cap funds we track, with a plain mandate: at least 80% of net assets in large-cap US equities.
  • Launched in 2023 on one of AB's core US equity strategies, with Jane Street signed on as lead market maker from day one.prnewswire.com

Worth knowing

LGDS No data

  • LRGC At 0.39%, it costs more than cheaper enhanced-index rivals in the same group, such as JUSA at 0.12% and GUSE at 0.30%.
  • Outcomes ride on the team's judgment, not an index rulebook, and about 70 positions concentrate those calls.
  • It trades lightly next to the big index names, so spreads can run wider, especially in fast markets.

Full LGDS profile⁠

Full LRGC profile⁠

LGDS vs LRGC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LGDS vs LRGC Cost

Overpaying LGDS vs LRGC

$192

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LGDS 0.40%

    $8,090

  • LRGC 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LGDS 0.40%
  • LRGC 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530LGDS $8,090LRGC $7,898

Year by year

YearLGDSLRGCOverpaying
10$723$705$18
20$2,793$2,725$68
30$8,090$7,898$192

Expense ratio

  • 0.40%LGDS
  • 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds

LGDS 20th cheapest of 90 funds

LGDS vs LRGC Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026
Yield (12M)
LGDS No data
LRGC 0.54%
Payout (12M)
LGDS None
LRGC $0.45
Last payment
LGDS No data
LRGC $0.45
Ex-dividend
LGDS No data
LRGC Dec 17, 2025
Paid on
LGDS No data
LRGC Dec 18, 2025
Frequency
LGDS No data
LRGC Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

LGDSAll LGDS payments⁠

No distribution history available.

LRGCAnnual · 3 paymentsAll LRGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 8, 2023 $0.09; Dec 17, 2024 $0.31; Dec 17, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

LGDS vs LRGC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LGDS No dataLRGC 12.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LGDS No dataLRGC 1.26
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LGDS No dataLRGC −19.4%since Sep 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LGDS 1.77LRGC 1.00

LGDS and LRGC in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • LGDSBvsJUSAA

    JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsJUSAA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LGDSBvsGUSEA

    JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsGUSEA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LGDSBvsFELGA

    JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsFELGA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.