XLE ranks 1st and LNGX 20th of 24 funds in the Energy (Broad) Category.
LNGX vs XLE
XLE −0.37pt a year
0.45%0.08%
XLE 2155.9×the volume
14K30.2M
LNGX vs XLE Performance
+44.0%+63.4%
- LNGX 0.45%
- XLE 0.08%, better
- LNGX $58M
- XLE $45.3B
- LNGX +44.0%
- XLE +63.4%, better
- LNGX
- XLE 2.18%
- LNGX 36
- XLE 24
- LNGX 14K sh
- XLE 30.2M sh, better
- LNGX $48.47
- XLE $68.72
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LNGX | XLE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C48 | A98Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F7 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | D26 | A97Higher |
| Holdings | A72Higher | D37 |
| Durability | D37 | A88Higher |
Rank among Energy (Broad) funds
Same Category. LNGX and XLE are both graded against the same 24 Energy (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LNGXD
XLEA
In short
LNGX A pure play on American natural gas: roughly 40 US producers and midstream operators that pull gas and NGLs out of the ground and move them. Broad energy funds bury that theme under oil majors. Launched in 2025.
XLE The 1998 original and still the default way to trade US energy: XLE holds only the oil, gas and oilfield services names inside the S&P 500, capped-weighted, for 0.08% a year.
Stated mandate
LNGX The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index. It uses an indexing approach and generally replicates an index of U.S.-listed and U.S.-domiciled companies involved in natural-gas and NGL upstream and midstream activities.
XLE The fund seeks to provide investment results that generally track the price and yield performance of the Energy Select Sector Index before expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LNGX vs XLE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LNGX vs XLE Cost
Overpaying LNGX vs XLE
$7,352
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LNGX 0.45%
$9,041
XLE 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LNGX | XLE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $147 | $665 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $575 | $2,553 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $1,689 | $7,352 |
- 0.45%LNGX
- 0.08%XLE, cheaper
- Middle half of Energy (Broad) funds
- Median 0.46%
XLE cheapest of 24 funds
LNGX 12th cheapest of 24 funds
LNGX vs XLE Dividends
- LNGX
- XLE 2.18%
- LNGX
- XLE $1.52
- LNGX $0.26
- XLE $0.38
- LNGX Jun 29, 2026
- XLE Sep 21, 2026
- LNGX Jul 2, 2026
- XLE Sep 23, 2026
- LNGX Twice a year
- XLE Quarterly
Distribution history
LNGX vs XLE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LNGX 30.9%XLE 21.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- LNGX 1.21XLE 0.82
- Worst fall
- LNGX −17.9%XLE −26.1%
- Market sensitivity
- LNGX −0.88XLE −0.02
LNGX and XLE in the news


Category Rankings
Chips, AI and crypto took October's losses




Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.