LRGC ranks 3rd and PCLG 58th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
LRGC vs PCLG
LRGC −0.10pt a year
0.39%0.49%
LRGC 1.8×the volume
34.1K18.7K
LRGC vs PCLG Performance
+9.2%−14.0%
- LRGC 0.39%, better
- PCLG 0.49%
- LRGC $1.35B
- PCLG $86M
- LRGC +9.2%, better
- PCLG −14.0%
- LRGC 0.53%
- PCLG
- LRGC 72
- PCLG 28
- LRGC 34.1K sh, better
- PCLG 18.7K sh
- LRGC $85.00
- PCLG $21.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LRGC | PCLG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | B62 |
| Mission | A79Higher | A75 |
| Risk | A90Higher | F15 |
| Tradability | A75Higher | C40 |
| Holdings | A77Higher | C43 |
| Durability | A78Higher | C42 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. LRGC and PCLG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LRGCA
PCLGC
In short
LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.
PCLG Polen Capital's flagship Focus Growth playbook, ETF-wrapped: roughly 25 large companies picked for durable competitive advantages and steady earnings growth. Conviction over count, with no index to hide behind.
Stated mandate
LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.
PCLG The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LRGC vs PCLG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LRGC vs PCLG Cost
Overpaying PCLG vs LRGC
$1,894
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LRGC 0.39%
$7,898
PCLG 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LRGC | PCLG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $883 | $178 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $3,394 | $669 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $9,792 | $1,894 |
- 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
- 0.49%PCLG
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds
PCLG 30th cheapest of 90 funds
LRGC vs PCLG Dividends
- LRGC 0.53%
- PCLG
- LRGC $0.45
- PCLG
- LRGC $0.45
- PCLG $0.0086
- LRGC Dec 17, 2025
- PCLG Dec 3, 2025
- LRGC Dec 18, 2025
- PCLG Dec 4, 2025
- LRGC Annual
- PCLG Irregular
Distribution history
LRGC vs PCLG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LRGC 12.7%PCLG 17.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- LRGC 1.26PCLG −0.81
- Worst fall
- LRGC −19.4%PCLG −23.8%
- Market sensitivity
- LRGC 1.00PCLG 1.14
LRGC and PCLG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

