Skip to content

LRGC vs SGRT

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

LRGCANYSE Arca

SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF

SGRTCNYSE Arca

Overlap

5.9%by weight

Expense ratio

LRGC −0.20pt a year

LRGC0.39%SGRT0.59%

Avg volume · 30D

SGRT 1.1×the volume

LRGC34.1KSGRT37.5K

LRGC vs SGRT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+9.2%LRGC+15.4%SGRT

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. LRGC +9.2%. SGRT +15.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%0%30%40%50%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
LRGC 0.39%, better
SGRT 0.59%
Fund size
LRGC $1.35B
SGRT $62M
1Y total return
LRGC +9.2%
SGRT +15.4%, better
Yield (12M)
LRGC 0.53%
SGRT No data
Holdings
LRGC 72
SGRT 25
Avg volume (30D)
LRGC 34.1K sh
SGRT 37.5K sh, better
NAV per share
LRGC $85.00
SGRT $31.57
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LRGC: Cost 82, Risk 90, Mission 79, Tradability 75, Holdings 77, Durability 78. SGRT: Cost 38, Risk 35, Mission 7, Tradability 49, Holdings 51, Durability 39.
Pillar letters and Scores for LRGC, SGRT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLRGCSGRT
Cost30% weightA82HigherD38
Mission25% weightA79HigherF7
Risk15% weightA90HigherD35
Tradability15% weightA75HigherC49
Holdings10% weightA77HigherC51
Durability5% weightA78HigherD39

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LRGC and SGRT are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

LRGC ranks 3rd and SGRT 60th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 60CJXXJanus Henderson Transformational Growth ETFScore 41
  6. Rank 60CSGRTSMART Earnings Growth 30 ETFScore 41
  7. Rank 60CTSCMTimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETFScore 41

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LRGCAAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

SGRTCSMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF

In short

LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.

SGRT Active, concentrated, and unapologetic about it: a compact roster of U.S. large caps picked for earnings growing faster than the market, with the S&P 500 as the yardstick. Launched in 2025, so the record is still being written.

Stated mandate

LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.

SGRT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It actively invests in U.S.-listed large-cap equities selected for potential above-market earnings growth versus broader equity markets.

Why people hold it

  • LRGC Roughly 70 holdings against a 500-stock yardstick, with quality and value screens doing the filtering. Each name actually carries weight.
  • 0.39% a year sits below the median fee in its active large-cap group, so the manager isn't digging out of a deep cost hole.
  • One of the stronger implementations among the actively managed US large-cap funds we track, with a plain mandate: at least 80% of net assets in large-cap US equities.
  • Launched in 2023 on one of AB's core US equity strategies, with Jane Street signed on as lead market maker from day one.prnewswire.com
  • SGRT The mandate is specific: actively pick U.S.-listed large caps with above-market earnings growth, and get measured against the S&P 500. Easy to hold accountable.
  • The "30" is the strategy. A compact roster means each holding carries real weight, unlike a broad index sleeve where one winner barely moves the needle.
  • Not a fund you trade by appointment: it changes hands with reasonable regularity for something this new.
  • Standard 1940 Act ETF plumbing behind it, so no exotic wrapper to decode before you look at the holdings.

Worth knowing

  • LRGC At 0.39%, it costs more than cheaper enhanced-index rivals in the same group, such as JUSA at 0.12% and GUSE at 0.30%.
  • Outcomes ride on the team's judgment, not an index rulebook, and about 70 positions concentrate those calls.
  • It trades lightly next to the big index names, so spreads can run wider, especially in fast markets.
  • SGRT At 0.59% it prices above the typical fee in its group, and peers working the same enhanced large-cap idea charge far less: JUSA at 0.12%, FELG at 0.18%.
  • A 2025 launch means the track record is short and has not yet spanned a full market cycle, so the stock picking is largely untested.
  • Concentration cuts both ways: with few names, a single earnings miss lands harder than it would across a 500-stock portfolio.

Full LRGC profile⁠

Full SGRT profile⁠

LRGC vs SGRT Holdings

How LRGC and SGRT differ

Overlap by weight

5.9%

Shared holdings make up 22.5% of SGRT and 10.7% of LRGC.

Level by level

  • Holdings4 in both5.9%
  • Countryby domicile96.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for SGRT.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in LRGC and SGRT, widest gap first
CountryMore in LRGCMore in SGRT
United StatesSGRT +4.0 points
TaiwanLRGC +1.2 points
NetherlandsLRGC +1.2 points
United KingdomLRGC +0.8 points
CanadaLRGC +0.7 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • LRGC42.4%
  • SGRT59.4%

Securities held

  • LRGC71
  • SGRT25

Asset class

LRGC
Equity
SGRT
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in LRGC67
  • In both4
  • Only in SGRT21

Only in LRGC

67 securities, 89.1% of LRGC by weight

  • Microsoft Corp Common Stock USD.000006256.93%
  • Apple Inc Common Stock USD.000015.98%
  • Alphabet Inc Class C Common Stock USD.0015.11%

Only in SGRT

21 securities, 77.6% of SGRT by weight

  • Dell Technologies Inc8.35%
  • Oscar Health Inc6.59%
  • Datadog Inc5.78%

Weight gaps

All 4 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in LRGC and SGRT, widest gap first
HoldingMore in LRGCMore in SGRT
Exxonmobil Holdings Corp Common StockXOMSGRT +5.82 points
Micron Technology Inc Common Stock USD.1MUSGRT +5.68 points
Waters Corp Common Stock USD.01WATSGRT +5.15 points
NVIDIA Corp Common Stock USD.001NVDALRGC +4.81 points

All 70 LRGC holdings⁠All SGRT holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LRGC vs SGRT Cost

Overpaying SGRT vs LRGC

$3,737

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LRGC 0.39%

    $7,898

  • SGRT 0.59%

    $11,635

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LRGC 0.39%
  • SGRT 0.59%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530SGRT $11,635LRGC $7,898

Year by year

YearLRGCSGRTOverpaying
10$705$1,058$353
20$2,725$4,051$1,326
30$7,898$11,635$3,737

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
  • 0.59%SGRT
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds

SGRT 56th cheapest of 90 funds

LRGC vs SGRT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
LRGC 0.53%
SGRT No data
Payout (12M)
LRGC $0.45
SGRT No data
Last payment
LRGC $0.45
SGRT $0.04
Ex-dividend
LRGC Dec 17, 2025
SGRT Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
LRGC Dec 18, 2025
SGRT Dec 24, 2025
Frequency
LRGC Annual
SGRT Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

LRGCAnnual · 3 paymentsAll LRGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 8, 2023 $0.09; Dec 17, 2024 $0.31; Dec 17, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
SGRTIrregular · 1 paymentAll SGRT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

LRGC vs SGRT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LRGC 12.7%SGRT 36.9%since Sep 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LRGC 1.26SGRT 1.08since Sep 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LRGC −19.4%since Sep 2023SGRT −25.0%since Aug 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LRGC 1.00SGRT 1.91

LRGC and SGRT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • LRGCAvsJUSAA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SGRTCvsJUSAA

    SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGCAvsGUSEA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SGRTCvsGUSEA

    SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGCAvsFELGA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SGRTCvsFELGA

    SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.