Skip to content
etf.net

LRGC vs SSMG

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

LRGCANYSE Arca

Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF

SSMGCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

LRGC0.39%SSMG0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

LRGC 142.5×the volume

LRGC34.1KSSMG239

LRGC vs SSMG Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−0.1%LRGC−9.4%SSMG

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. LRGC −0.1%. SSMG −9.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%5%10%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
LRGC 0.39%
SSMG 0.39%
Fund size
LRGC $1.37B
SSMG $3M
1Y total return
LRGC +9.5%
SSMG No data
Yield (12M)
LRGC 0.53%
SSMG No data
Holdings
LRGC 72
SSMG 83
Avg volume (30D)
LRGC 34.1K sh, better
SSMG 239 sh
NAV per share
LRGC $85.00
SSMG $23.96
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LRGC: Cost 82, Risk 90, Mission 79, Tradability 75, Holdings 77, Durability 78. SSMG: Cost 82, Risk 19, Mission not scored, Tradability 8, Holdings 85, Durability 32.
Pillar letters and Scores for LRGC, SSMG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLRGCSSMG
Cost30% weightA82A82
Mission25% weightA79Not scored
Risk15% weightA90HigherF19
Tradability15% weightA75HigherF8
Holdings10% weightA77A85Higher
Durability5% weightA78HigherD32

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LRGC and SSMG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

LRGC ranks 3rd and SSMG 64th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 64CPCLCPolen 5Perspectives Large Growth ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 64CSSMGVirtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 64CTLGTouchstone Large Company Growth ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LRGCAAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

SSMGCVirtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF

In short

LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.

SSMG Silvant brings its small/mid-cap growth playbook to an ETF wrapper: roughly 80 US names, hand-picked one at a time, priced under the typical active growth fund. Down-cap conviction in a shelf full of large-cap engines.

Stated mandate

LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.

SSMG The Fund seeks capital appreciation.

Why people hold it

  • LRGC Roughly 70 holdings against a 500-stock yardstick, with quality and value screens doing the filtering. Each name actually carries weight.
  • 0.39% a year sits below the median fee in its active large-cap group, so the manager isn't digging out of a deep cost hole.
  • One of the stronger implementations among the actively managed US large-cap funds we track, with a plain mandate: at least 80% of net assets in large-cap US equities.
  • Launched in 2023 on one of AB's core US equity strategies, with Jane Street signed on as lead market maker from day one.prnewswire.com
  • SSMG Charges 0.39% a year against a 0.54% median for its active growth peer group. Cheap shelf space for a stock-picked portfolio.
  • Its conviction-growth cohort leans large-cap (JUSA, FELG, MAGS). SSMG fishes lower: US small- and mid-caps, about 80 holdings.
  • Actively run and focused: roughly 70 to 90 stocks the team ties to secular trends or company-specific growth drivers, chosen bottom-up rather than copied from an index.sec.govyahoo.com

Worth knowing

  • LRGC At 0.39%, it costs more than cheaper enhanced-index rivals in the same group, such as JUSA at 0.12% and GUSE at 0.30%.
  • Outcomes ride on the team's judgment, not an index rulebook, and about 70 positions concentrate those calls.
  • It trades lightly next to the big index names, so spreads can run wider, especially in fast markets.
  • SSMG Launched in 2026 with a small asset base and light trading, so the wrapper's record is short and spreads can be wider than on household-name funds.
  • The mandate is capital appreciation, full stop. This has not been an income payer.
  • Small- and mid-cap growth moves harder in both directions than large-cap growth, and with only about 80 names, individual stocks carry real weight.yahoo.com

Full LRGC profile⁠

Full SSMG profile⁠

LRGC vs SSMG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LRGC vs SSMG Cost

Same expense ratio

$7,898

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LRGC 0.39%

    $7,898

  • SSMG 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LRGC 0.39%
  • SSMG 0.39%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530LRGC $7,898SSMG $7,898

Year by year

YearLRGCSSMG
10$705$705
20$2,725$2,725
30$7,898$7,898

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%LRGC
  • 0.39%SSMG
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds

SSMG 14th cheapest of 90 funds

LRGC vs SSMG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
LRGC 0.53%
SSMG No data
Payout (12M)
LRGC $0.45
SSMG None
Last payment
LRGC $0.45
SSMG No data
Ex-dividend
LRGC Dec 17, 2025
SSMG No data
Paid on
LRGC Dec 18, 2025
SSMG No data
Frequency
LRGC Annual
SSMG No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

LRGCAnnual · 3 paymentsAll LRGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 8, 2023 $0.09; Dec 17, 2024 $0.31; Dec 17, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
SSMGAll SSMG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

LRGC vs SSMG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LRGC 12.7%SSMG No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LRGC 1.26SSMG No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LRGC −19.4%since Sep 2023SSMG No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LRGC 1.00SSMG 1.34

LRGC and SSMG in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • LRGCAvsJUSAA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SSMGCvsJUSAA

    Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsGUSEA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SSMGCvsGUSEA

    Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsFELGA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SSMGCvsFELGA

    Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.