PSFJ ranks 2nd and MARW 19th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.
MARW vs PSFJ
PSFJ −0.25pt a year
0.74%0.49%
PSFJ 5.7×the volume
1.85K10.6K
PSFJ +4.0pt
+11.9%+15.9%
MARW vs PSFJ Performance
+9.1%+9.4%
- MARW 0.74%
- PSFJ 0.49%, better
- MARW $86M
- PSFJ $57M
- MARW +9.1%
- PSFJ +9.4%, better
- MARW 2
- PSFJ 4
- MARW 1.85K sh
- PSFJ 10.6K sh, better
- MARW $37.11
- PSFJ $35.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MARW | PSFJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | A85Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B60Higher | D29 |
| Tradability | D26 | C50Higher |
| Holdings | C50 | |
| Durability | C54 | B57Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
Same Category. MARW and PSFJ are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MARWC
PSFJB
In short
MARW March's rung in AllianzIM's monthly buffer ladder: FLEX options tracking SPY's share price for a year, with the first 20% of losses absorbed and upside capped, then reset every March. Hedging runs on Allianz Life's own platform.
PSFJ A 20% cushion against the S&P 500's first losses, paid for with a ceiling on the upside, reset every July 1. Pacer runs the trade for less than most of the deep-buffer crowd charges.
Stated mandate
MARW The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust through FLEX Options over a one-year Outcome Period, with upside limited by a Cap and the first 20% of underlying losses buffered.
PSFJ The Fund seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while buffering the first 20% of downside losses over an approximate one-year period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MARW vs PSFJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MARW vs PSFJ Cost
Overpaying MARW vs PSFJ
$4,515
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MARW 0.74%
$14,307
PSFJ 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MARW | PSFJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $883 | $436 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $3,394 | $1,621 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $9,792 | $4,515 |
- 0.74%MARW
- 0.49%PSFJ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
- Median 0.74%
PSFJ cheapest of 24 funds
MARW 10th cheapest of 24 funds
MARW vs PSFJ Dividends
- MARW None
- PSFJ None
Distribution history
MARW vs PSFJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MARW 4.8%, betterPSFJ 7.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- MARW 1.46PSFJ 1.51, better
- Worst fall
- MARW −7.6%PSFJ −12.2%
- Market sensitivity
- MARW 0.36PSFJ 0.55
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.