Skip to content

MARW vs PSFJ

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Mar ETF

MARWCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

PSFJBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSFJ −0.25pt a year

MARW0.74%PSFJ0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

PSFJ 5.7×the volume

MARW1.85KPSFJ10.6K

3Y return · a year

PSFJ +4.0pt

MARW+11.9%PSFJ+15.9%

MARW vs PSFJ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+9.1%MARW+9.4%PSFJ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. MARW +9.1%. PSFJ +9.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
MARW 0.74%
PSFJ 0.49%, better
Fund size
MARW $86M
PSFJ $57M
1Y total return
MARW +9.1%
PSFJ +9.4%, better
Holdings
MARW 2
PSFJ 4
Avg volume (30D)
MARW 1.85K sh
PSFJ 10.6K sh, better
NAV per share
MARW $37.11
PSFJ $35.85
52W range

ETF.net Grade

MARW: Cost 37, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 26, Holdings 50, Durability 54. PSFJ: Cost 85, Risk 29, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings not scored, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for MARW, PSFJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarMARWPSFJ
Cost30% weightD37A85Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB60HigherD29
Tradability15% weightD26C50Higher
Holdings10% weightC50Not scored
Durability5% weightC54B57Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. MARW and PSFJ are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

PSFJ ranks 2nd and MARW 19th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 4BPSFOPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETFScore 60
  5. Rank 18CFEBWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Feb ETFScore 44
  6. Rank 19CMARWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Mar ETFScore 42
  7. Rank 20CPQXXPGIM S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer 20 ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MARWCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Mar ETF

PSFJBPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

In short

MARW March's rung in AllianzIM's monthly buffer ladder: FLEX options tracking SPY's share price for a year, with the first 20% of losses absorbed and upside capped, then reset every March. Hedging runs on Allianz Life's own platform.

PSFJ A 20% cushion against the S&P 500's first losses, paid for with a ceiling on the upside, reset every July 1. Pacer runs the trade for less than most of the deep-buffer crowd charges.

Stated mandate

MARW The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust through FLEX Options over a one-year Outcome Period, with upside limited by a Cap and the first 20% of underlying losses buffered.

PSFJ The Fund seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while buffering the first 20% of downside losses over an approximate one-year period.

Why people hold it

  • MARW The 20% buffer is among the deepest in defined-outcome land, and it is written into the fund's terms, not left to a manager's judgment.
  • Hedging is handled in-house on the same proprietary platform Allianz Life uses to hedge its annuity book, rather than outsourced to a sub-adviser.allianzlife.com
  • One rung in a full 12-month ladder: a same-structure AllianzIM fund opens a fresh outcome period every month, so entry and roll dates are a choice.allianzim.comallianzlife.com
  • The FLEX options are exchange-listed and settled through the Options Clearing Corporation, so the payoff isn't riding on one bank's balance sheet.allianzim.com
  • PSFJ Costs 0.49% a year against a 0.74% median for 20% S&P 500 buffer funds, and undercuts the 0.74% AllianzIM month-series funds (JUNW, AUGW, DECW) built on the same reference.
  • Deep cushion by design: it aims to absorb the first 20% of a decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each roughly one-year period, before fees and expenses.paceretfs.com
  • Live since 2021, with several annual reset cycles behind it and sibling funds (PSFM, PSFD) covering other start months. One of the stronger builds in a crowded 20% buffer field.

Worth knowing

  • MARW At 0.74% it sits mid-pack for 20%-buffer funds, and Pacer's PSFJ and PSFM (0.49%) and PGIM's PBJA and PBJN (0.50%) deliver the same basic shape for less.
  • Buffer and cap are engineered for a full March-to-February period; buy midstream and your own downside cushion and upside room differ from the stated terms.allianzim.com
  • Trades lightly next to the category's biggest names, so the spread and a limit order matter more than usual.
  • PSFJ The price of the cushion is a ceiling. Upside is capped at a level set when each July outcome period begins, so a roaring market leaves gains on the table.paceretfs.com
  • Buffer and cap are designed to work over the full outcome period. Buy mid-period and the cushion remaining and the room left to run differ from the stated terms.paceretfs.com
  • A smaller, thinly traded fund, so spreads can run wider than in the biggest names in the group. Income is not part of the design either.

Full MARW profile⁠

Full PSFJ profile⁠

MARW vs PSFJ Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MARW vs PSFJ Cost

Overpaying MARW vs PSFJ

$4,515

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • MARW 0.74%

    $14,307

  • PSFJ 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • MARW 0.74%
  • PSFJ 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530MARW $14,307PSFJ $9,792

Year by year

YearMARWPSFJOverpaying
10$1,319$883$436
20$5,015$3,394$1,621
30$14,307$9,792$4,515

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%MARW
  • 0.49%PSFJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFJ cheapest of 24 funds

MARW 10th cheapest of 24 funds

MARW vs PSFJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
MARW None
PSFJ None

Distribution history

MARWAll MARW payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSFJAll PSFJ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

MARW vs PSFJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
MARW 4.8%, betterPSFJ 7.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
MARW 1.46PSFJ 1.51, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
MARW −7.6%since Feb 2023PSFJ −12.2%since Nov 2021
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
MARW 0.36PSFJ 0.55

Popular comparisons

  • MARWCvsBALTB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Mar ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFJBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MARWCvsPSFDB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Mar ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFJBvsPSFDB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MARWCvsPSFOB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Mar ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFJBvsPSFOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.