PSFO ranks 4th and MARW 19th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.
MARW vs PSFO
PSFO −0.25pt a year
0.74%0.49%
PSFO 3.9×the volume
1.85K7.12K
PSFO +2.6pt
+11.9%+14.5%
MARW vs PSFO Performance
+9.1%+11.5%
- MARW 0.74%
- PSFO 0.49%, better
- MARW $86M
- PSFO $47M
- MARW +9.1%
- PSFO +11.5%, better
- MARW 2
- PSFO 4
- MARW 1.85K sh
- PSFO 7.12K sh, better
- MARW $37.11
- PSFO $35.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MARW | PSFO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | A85Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B60Higher | D29 |
| Tradability | D26 | C44Higher |
| Holdings | C50 | |
| Durability | C54 | B59Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
Same Category. MARW and PSFO are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MARWC
PSFOB
In short
MARW March's rung in AllianzIM's monthly buffer ladder: FLEX options tracking SPY's share price for a year, with the first 20% of losses absorbed and upside capped, then reset every March. Hedging runs on Allianz Life's own platform.
PSFO Pacer's October-dated buffer fund absorbs the first 20% of an S&P 500 drop over each 12-month period, in exchange for a ceiling on the upside. At 0.49%, it charges less than the typical fund in its buffer peer group.
Stated mandate
MARW The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust through FLEX Options over a one-year Outcome Period, with upside limited by a Cap and the first 20% of underlying losses buffered.
PSFO The fund seeks to match the pre-fee and pre-expense returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MARW vs PSFO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MARW vs PSFO Cost
Overpaying MARW vs PSFO
$4,515
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MARW 0.74%
$14,307
PSFO 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MARW | PSFO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $883 | $436 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $3,394 | $1,621 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $9,792 | $4,515 |
- 0.74%MARW
- 0.49%PSFO, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
- Median 0.74%
PSFO cheapest of 24 funds
MARW 10th cheapest of 24 funds
MARW vs PSFO Dividends
- MARW None
- PSFO None
Distribution history
MARW vs PSFO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MARW 4.8%, betterPSFO 6.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- MARW 1.46, betterPSFO 1.38
- Worst fall
- MARW −7.6%PSFO −12.1%
- Market sensitivity
- MARW 0.36PSFO 0.50
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.