Skip to content

MARW vs PSFO

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Mar ETF

MARWCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

PSFOBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSFO −0.25pt a year

MARW0.74%PSFO0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

PSFO 3.9×the volume

MARW1.85KPSFO7.12K

3Y return · a year

PSFO +2.6pt

MARW+11.9%PSFO+14.5%

MARW vs PSFO Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+9.1%MARW+11.5%PSFO

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. MARW +9.1%. PSFO +11.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
MARW 0.74%
PSFO 0.49%, better
Fund size
MARW $86M
PSFO $47M
1Y total return
MARW +9.1%
PSFO +11.5%, better
Holdings
MARW 2
PSFO 4
Avg volume (30D)
MARW 1.85K sh
PSFO 7.12K sh, better
NAV per share
MARW $37.11
PSFO $35.95
52W range

ETF.net Grade

MARW: Cost 37, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 26, Holdings 50, Durability 54. PSFO: Cost 85, Risk 29, Mission 95, Tradability 44, Holdings not scored, Durability 59.
Pillar letters and Scores for MARW, PSFO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarMARWPSFO
Cost30% weightD37A85Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA95
Risk15% weightB60HigherD29
Tradability15% weightD26C44Higher
Holdings10% weightC50Not scored
Durability5% weightC54B59Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. MARW and PSFO are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

PSFO ranks 4th and MARW 19th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 4BPSFOPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETFScore 60
  5. Rank 5BPSFMPacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETFScore 58
  6. Rank 18CFEBWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Feb ETFScore 44
  7. Rank 19CMARWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Mar ETFScore 42
  8. Rank 20CPQXXPGIM S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer 20 ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MARWCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Mar ETF

PSFOBPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

In short

MARW March's rung in AllianzIM's monthly buffer ladder: FLEX options tracking SPY's share price for a year, with the first 20% of losses absorbed and upside capped, then reset every March. Hedging runs on Allianz Life's own platform.

PSFO Pacer's October-dated buffer fund absorbs the first 20% of an S&P 500 drop over each 12-month period, in exchange for a ceiling on the upside. At 0.49%, it charges less than the typical fund in its buffer peer group.

Stated mandate

MARW The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust through FLEX Options over a one-year Outcome Period, with upside limited by a Cap and the first 20% of underlying losses buffered.

PSFO The fund seeks to match the pre-fee and pre-expense returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.

Why people hold it

  • MARW The 20% buffer is among the deepest in defined-outcome land, and it is written into the fund's terms, not left to a manager's judgment.
  • Hedging is handled in-house on the same proprietary platform Allianz Life uses to hedge its annuity book, rather than outsourced to a sub-adviser.allianzlife.com
  • One rung in a full 12-month ladder: a same-structure AllianzIM fund opens a fresh outcome period every month, so entry and roll dates are a choice.allianzim.comallianzlife.com
  • The FLEX options are exchange-listed and settled through the Options Clearing Corporation, so the payoff isn't riding on one bank's balance sheet.allianzim.com
  • PSFO 0.49% a year, below the median fee in its S&P 500 buffer cohort and well under peers like PMAY (0.79%) and BUFZ (0.95%).
  • Built to absorb the first 20% of a decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) over each outcome period before the fund itself starts taking losses.
  • A 1940 Act ETF holding its own option package, not a bank-issued note, so no third-party credit sits between you and the payoff. Running since 2021.
  • Rates in the upper tier of a two-dozen-fund group of S&P 500 buffer strategies, largely on price.

Worth knowing

  • MARW At 0.74% it sits mid-pack for 20%-buffer funds, and Pacer's PSFJ and PSFM (0.49%) and PGIM's PBJA and PBJN (0.50%) deliver the same basic shape for less.
  • Buffer and cap are engineered for a full March-to-February period; buy midstream and your own downside cushion and upside room differ from the stated terms.allianzim.com
  • Trades lightly next to the category's biggest names, so the spread and a limit order matter more than usual.
  • PSFO The price of the cushion: gains stop at a cap fixed at the start of each period, and the fund hasn't been an income payer.
  • Buffer and cap are engineered for the full October 1 to September 30 stretch. Buy mid-period and your real cushion and ceiling differ from the headline terms.
  • Small asset base and light trading, which usually means wider spreads and more attention needed on how orders get entered.

Full MARW profile⁠

Full PSFO profile⁠

MARW vs PSFO Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MARW vs PSFO Cost

Overpaying MARW vs PSFO

$4,515

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • MARW 0.74%

    $14,307

  • PSFO 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • MARW 0.74%
  • PSFO 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530MARW $14,307PSFO $9,792

Year by year

YearMARWPSFOOverpaying
10$1,319$883$436
20$5,015$3,394$1,621
30$14,307$9,792$4,515

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%MARW
  • 0.49%PSFO, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFO cheapest of 24 funds

MARW 10th cheapest of 24 funds

MARW vs PSFO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
MARW None
PSFO None

Distribution history

MARWAll MARW payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSFOAll PSFO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

MARW vs PSFO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
MARW 4.8%, betterPSFO 6.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
MARW 1.46, betterPSFO 1.38
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
MARW −7.6%since Feb 2023PSFO −12.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
MARW 0.36PSFO 0.50

Popular comparisons

  • MARWCvsBALTB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Mar ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFOBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MARWCvsPSFDB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Mar ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFOBvsPSFDB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MARWCvsPSFJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Mar ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFOBvsPSFJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.