Skip to content

MAYW vs PSFJ

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 May ETF

MAYWCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

PSFJBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSFJ −0.25pt a year

MAYW0.74%PSFJ0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

MAYW 2.7×the volume

MAYW28.5KPSFJ10.6K

3Y return · a year

PSFJ +4.3pt

MAYW+11.6%PSFJ+15.9%

MAYW vs PSFJ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+7.1%MAYW+9.4%PSFJ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. MAYW +7.1%. PSFJ +9.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
MAYW 0.74%
PSFJ 0.49%, better
Fund size
MAYW $460M
PSFJ $57M
1Y total return
MAYW +7.1%
PSFJ +9.4%, better
Holdings
MAYW 2
PSFJ 4
Avg volume (30D)
MAYW 28.5K sh, better
PSFJ 10.6K sh
NAV per share
MAYW $35.74
PSFJ $35.85
52W range

ETF.net Grade

MAYW: Cost 37, Risk 57, Mission not scored, Tradability 49, Holdings 59, Durability 60. PSFJ: Cost 85, Risk 29, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings not scored, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for MAYW, PSFJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarMAYWPSFJ
Cost30% weightD37A85Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB57HigherD29
Tradability15% weightC49C50Higher
Holdings10% weightB59Not scored
Durability5% weightB60HigherB57

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. MAYW and PSFJ are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

PSFJ ranks 2nd and MAYW 15th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 4BPSFOPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETFScore 60
  5. Rank 14CDECWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Dec ETFScore 48
  6. Rank 15CMAYWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 May ETFScore 47
  7. Rank 15CNVBWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Nov ETFScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MAYWCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 May ETF

PSFJBPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

In short

MAYW A 20% cushion on the S&P 500, reset every May. MAYW holds a year of FLEX options on the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust: the first 20% of a drop gets absorbed, and upside stops at a cap set fresh each period.

PSFJ A 20% cushion against the S&P 500's first losses, paid for with a ceiling on the upside, reset every July 1. Pacer runs the trade for less than most of the deep-buffer crowd charges.

Stated mandate

MAYW The Fund uses FLEX Options tied to the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust to seek the ETF’s share-price return through the current Outcome Period, subject to an upside cap and a 20% downside buffer.

PSFJ The Fund seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while buffering the first 20% of downside losses over an approximate one-year period.

Why people hold it

  • MAYW Deep cushion by design: the options package aims to absorb the first 20% of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust's price decline over the outcome period.
  • Terms are known upfront. Each May 1 the fund starts a new 12-month period with a new cap, so the trade-off is spelled out before the clock runs.
  • One of the stronger builds in the 20% S&P 500 buffer group, with enough size and turnover to trade without drama.
  • PSFJ Costs 0.49% a year against a 0.74% median for 20% S&P 500 buffer funds, and undercuts the 0.74% AllianzIM month-series funds (JUNW, AUGW, DECW) built on the same reference.
  • Deep cushion by design: it aims to absorb the first 20% of a decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each roughly one-year period, before fees and expenses.paceretfs.com
  • Live since 2021, with several annual reset cycles behind it and sibling funds (PSFM, PSFD) covering other start months. One of the stronger builds in a crowded 20% buffer field.

Worth knowing

  • MAYW The cap is what pays for the buffer. Gains above it stay on the table, and the fund targets share-price return, so S&P dividends aren't part of the package.
  • Buffer and cap are measured May 1 to April 30. Step in mid-period and your actual cushion and ceiling differ from the headline terms.
  • At 0.74% it sits right at the group median, but cheaper 20% buffer builds exist (PBFR at 0.50%, PSFM at 0.49%).
  • PSFJ The price of the cushion is a ceiling. Upside is capped at a level set when each July outcome period begins, so a roaring market leaves gains on the table.paceretfs.com
  • Buffer and cap are designed to work over the full outcome period. Buy mid-period and the cushion remaining and the room left to run differ from the stated terms.paceretfs.com
  • A smaller, thinly traded fund, so spreads can run wider than in the biggest names in the group. Income is not part of the design either.

Full MAYW profile⁠

Full PSFJ profile⁠

MAYW vs PSFJ Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MAYW vs PSFJ Cost

Overpaying MAYW vs PSFJ

$4,515

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • MAYW 0.74%

    $14,307

  • PSFJ 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • MAYW 0.74%
  • PSFJ 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530MAYW $14,307PSFJ $9,792

Year by year

YearMAYWPSFJOverpaying
10$1,319$883$436
20$5,015$3,394$1,621
30$14,307$9,792$4,515

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%MAYW
  • 0.49%PSFJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFJ cheapest of 24 funds

MAYW 10th cheapest of 24 funds

MAYW vs PSFJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
MAYW None
PSFJ None

Distribution history

MAYWAll MAYW payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSFJAll PSFJ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

MAYW vs PSFJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
MAYW 3.4%, betterPSFJ 7.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
MAYW 1.99, betterPSFJ 1.51
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
MAYW −7.9%since May 2023PSFJ −12.2%since Nov 2021
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
MAYW 0.25PSFJ 0.55

Popular comparisons

  • MAYWCvsBALTB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 May ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFJBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MAYWCvsPSFDB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 May ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFJBvsPSFDB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MAYWCvsPSFOB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 May ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFJBvsPSFOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.