PTBD ranks 3rd and MDAA 20th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
MDAA vs PTBD
PTBD −0.37pt a year
0.97%0.60%
PTBD 49.6×the volume
38018.8K
MDAA vs PTBD Performance
+10.2%+0.1%
- MDAA 0.97%
- PTBD 0.60%, better
- MDAA $425M
- PTBD $83M
- MDAA +10.2%, better
- PTBD +0.1%
- MDAA
- PTBD 6.35%
- MDAA 63
- PTBD 1050
- MDAA 380 sh
- PTBD 18.8K sh, better
- MDAA $109.49
- PTBD $18.38
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MDAA | PTBD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D39 | A83Higher |
| Mission | A92 | |
| Risk | F24 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | D39 | C49Higher |
| Holdings | A84 | A90Higher |
| Durability | A70 | A83Higher |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. MDAA and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MDAAB
PTBDA
In short
MDAA A go-anywhere multi-asset fund that names its opponent out loud: the classic 60/40. MDAA chases long-term growth first and capital preservation second, shifting across global stocks and bonds to try to beat that blend.
PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.
Stated mandate
MDAA The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and, secondarily, capital preservation. It aims to outperform a benchmark consisting of 60% global equities and 40% global bonds over the long term.
PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MDAA vs PTBD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MDAA vs PTBD Cost
Overpaying MDAA vs PTBD
$6,381
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MDAA 0.97%
$18,198
PTBD 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MDAA | PTBD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,712 | $1,076 | $636 |
| 20 | $6,443 | $4,116 | $2,327 |
| 30 | $18,198 | $11,817 | $6,381 |
- 0.97%MDAA
- 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds
MDAA 28th cheapest of 46 funds
MDAA vs PTBD Dividends
- MDAA
- PTBD 6.35%
- MDAA
- PTBD $1.17
- MDAA $0.46
- PTBD $0.10
- MDAA Dec 29, 2025
- PTBD Oct 22, 2026
- MDAA Dec 31, 2025
- PTBD Oct 26, 2026
- MDAA Irregular
- PTBD Monthly
Distribution history
MDAA vs PTBD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MDAA 21.0%PTBD 5.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- MDAA 0.42PTBD 0.08
- Worst fall
- MDAA −14.6%PTBD −24.8%
- Market sensitivity
- MDAA 1.36PTBD 0.74
MDAA and PTBD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.97% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

