MDY ranks 4th and XJH 4th of 11 funds in the S&P MidCap 400 Category.
MDY vs XJH
XJH −0.11pt a year
0.23%0.12%
MDY 33.7×the volume
647K19.2K
MDY +0.1pt
+6.4%+6.3%
MDY vs XJH Performance
+36.4%+35.6%
- MDY 0.23%
- XJH 0.12%, better
- MDY $25.5B
- XJH $412M
- MDY +15.7%
- XJH +17.2%, better
- MDY 1.03%
- XJH 1.12%, better
- MDY 401
- XJH 361
- MDY 647K sh, better
- XJH 19.2K sh
- MDY $658.01
- XJH $48.81
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MDY | XJH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F24 | B68Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B57Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | A93Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | A79Higher | A78 |
| Durability | A76Higher | D37 |
Rank among S&P MidCap 400 funds
Same Category. MDY and XJH are both graded against the same 11 S&P MidCap 400 funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MDYB
XJHB
In short
MDY Launched in 1995, MDY was the original one-ticker route into the S&P MidCap 400, and it still trades like a heavyweight. The trade-off: a fee set in an era before same-index clones charged pennies.
XJH The S&P MidCap 400 with a bouncer at the door. XJH tracks a screened version of the same mid-cap benchmark, dropping companies tied to tobacco, thermal coal, oil sands, fossil fuel reserves and weapons.
Stated mandate
MDY The fund seeks to track, before expenses, the price and yield performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index.
XJH The fund seeks to track an ESG-screened version of the S&P MidCap 400 Index, providing core U.S. mid-cap equity exposure while excluding certain controversial business activities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MDY vs XJH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MDY vs XJH Cost
Overpaying MDY vs XJH
$2,239
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MDY 0.23%
$4,759
XJH 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MDY | XJH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $419 | $220 | $199 |
| 20 | $1,630 | $859 | $771 |
| 30 | $4,759 | $2,520 | $2,239 |
- 0.23%MDY
- 0.12%XJH, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P MidCap 400 funds
- Median 0.15%
XJH 4th cheapest of 11 funds
MDY 9th cheapest of 11 funds
MDY vs XJH Dividends
- MDY 1.03%
- XJH 1.12%, better
- MDY $7.01
- XJH $0.57
- MDY $1.60
- XJH $0.14
- MDY Sep 18, 2026
- XJH Sep 15, 2026
- MDY Oct 30, 2026
- XJH Sep 18, 2026
- MDY Quarterly
- XJH Quarterly
Distribution history
MDY vs XJH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- MDY
- XJH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MDY 15.1%, betterXJH 15.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- MDY 0.83, betterXJH 0.81
- Worst fall
- MDY −24.0%, betterXJH −25.1%
- Market sensitivity
- MDY 1.01XJH 1.05
MDY and XJH in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.23% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
