OKTG ranks 3rd and METW 31st of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
METW vs OKTG
OKTG −0.25pt a year
1.00%0.75%
OKTG 2.2×the volume
17.1K37.8K
METW vs OKTG Performance
−7.7%+144.2%
- METW 1.00%
- OKTG 0.75%, better
- METW $22M
- OKTG $5M
- METW −1.2%
- OKTG
- METW 46.43%
- OKTG
- METW 4
- OKTG 6
- METW 17.1K sh
- OKTG 37.8K sh, better
- METW $22.77
- OKTG $34.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | METW | OKTG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A96Higher | A95 |
| Risk | A82Higher | A78 |
| Tradability | B63 | B69Higher |
| Holdings | B57 | |
| Durability | A73Higher | C50 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. METW and OKTG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
METWB
OKTGA
In short
METW Most leveraged single-stock funds reset daily. This one resets on the calendar week, targeting 120% of Meta's Friday-to-Friday total return, and pays shareholders weekly without selling a single call option.
OKTG A 2x daily amplifier on Okta, the identity-security stock, in an ETF wrapper. Leverage Shares prices it at 0.75%, under the typical leveraged single-stock fund, in a corner of the market built mostly around mega-caps.
Stated mandate
METW METW seeks weekly distributions and calendar-week returns before fees and expenses equal to 1.2 times the calendar-week total return of Meta common shares.
OKTG The fund seeks daily leveraged investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of the publicly traded common stock identified as OKTA, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
METW vs OKTG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
METW vs OKTG Cost
Overpaying METW vs OKTG
$4,206
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
METW 1.00%
$18,688
OKTG 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | METW | OKTG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $1,336 | $427 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $5,078 | $1,547 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $14,482 | $4,206 |
- 1.00%METW
- 0.75%OKTG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
OKTG 87th cheapest of 312 funds
METW 196th cheapest of 312 funds
METW vs OKTG Dividends
- METW 46.43%
- OKTG
- METW $11.19
- OKTG None
- METW $0.13
- OKTG
- METW Nov 9, 2026
- OKTG
- METW Pays Nov 10, 2026
- OKTG
- METW Weekly
- OKTG
Distribution history
METW vs OKTG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- METW 43.1%OKTG
- Return per unit of risk
- METW −0.40OKTG
- Worst fall
- METW −40.5%OKTG
- Market sensitivity
- METW 1.45OKTG 2.39
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.