TSMG ranks 2nd and METW 31st of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
METW vs TSMG
TSMG −0.24pt a year
1.00%0.76%
TSMG 4.0×the volume
17.1K68.1K
METW vs TSMG Performance
−1.2%+40.3%
- METW 1.00%
- TSMG 0.76%, better
- METW $22M
- TSMG $24M
- METW −1.2%
- TSMG +40.3%, better
- METW 46.43%
- TSMG
- METW 4
- TSMG 6
- METW 17.1K sh
- TSMG 68.1K sh, better
- METW $22.77
- TSMG $28.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | METW | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A96Higher | A75 |
| Risk | A82 | A82 |
| Tradability | B63 | A76Higher |
| Holdings | B57 | |
| Durability | A73Higher | B66 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. METW and TSMG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
METWB
TSMGA
In short
METW Most leveraged single-stock funds reset daily. This one resets on the calendar week, targeting 120% of Meta's Friday-to-Friday total return, and pays shareholders weekly without selling a single call option.
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
METW METW seeks weekly distributions and calendar-week returns before fees and expenses equal to 1.2 times the calendar-week total return of Meta common shares.
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
METW vs TSMG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
METW vs TSMG Cost
Overpaying METW vs TSMG
$4,032
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
METW 1.00%
$18,688
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | METW | TSMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $1,353 | $410 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $5,142 | $1,483 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $14,656 | $4,032 |
- 1.00%METW
- 0.76%TSMG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
TSMG 131st cheapest of 312 funds
METW 196th cheapest of 312 funds
METW vs TSMG Dividends
- METW 46.43%
- TSMG
- METW $11.19
- TSMG
- METW $0.13
- TSMG $2.73
- METW Nov 9, 2026
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- METW Pays Nov 10, 2026
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- METW Weekly
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
METW vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- METW 43.1%TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- METW −0.40TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- METW −40.5%TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- METW 1.45TSMG 3.98
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.