COTG ranks 3rd and METW 31st of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
COTG vs METW
COTG −0.23pt a year
0.77%1.00%
COTG 5.7×the volume
97.2K17.1K
COTG vs METW Performance
+16.3%−1.2%
- COTG 0.77%, better
- METW 1.00%
- COTG $9M
- METW $22M
- COTG +16.3%, better
- METW −1.2%
- COTG
- METW 46.43%
- COTG 4
- METW 4
- COTG 97.2K sh, better
- METW 17.1K sh
- COTG $15.32
- METW $22.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COTG | METW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B61Higher | C50 |
| Mission | A95 | A96Higher |
| Risk | A86Higher | A82 |
| Tradability | A77Higher | B63 |
| Holdings | B57 | |
| Durability | B56 | A73Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. COTG and METW are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COTGA
METWB
In short
COTG Most single-stock leverage chases chips and crypto. COTG points it at a warehouse club, aiming to deliver 200% of Costco's daily move before fees, and resetting the clock every session.
METW Most leveraged single-stock funds reset daily. This one resets on the calendar week, targeting 120% of Meta's Friday-to-Friday total return, and pays shareholders weekly without selling a single call option.
Stated mandate
COTG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Costco Wholesale Corporation stock, before fees and expenses.
METW METW seeks weekly distributions and calendar-week returns before fees and expenses equal to 1.2 times the calendar-week total return of Meta common shares.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COTG vs METW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COTG vs METW Cost
Overpaying METW vs COTG
$3,859
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COTG 0.77%
$14,829
METW 1.00%
$18,688
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COTG | METW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,371 | $1,763 | $392 |
| 20 | $5,205 | $6,625 | $1,420 |
| 30 | $14,829 | $18,688 | $3,859 |
- 0.77%COTG, cheaper
- 1.00%METW
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
COTG 135th cheapest of 312 funds
METW 196th cheapest of 312 funds
COTG vs METW Dividends
- COTG
- METW 46.43%
- COTG None
- METW $11.19
- COTG
- METW $0.13
- COTG
- METW Nov 9, 2026
- COTG
- METW Pays Nov 10, 2026
- COTG
- METW Weekly
Distribution history
COTG vs METW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COTG 38.3%METW 43.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- COTG 0.12METW −0.40
- Worst fall
- COTG −36.4%METW −40.5%
- Market sensitivity
- COTG −0.04METW 1.45
COTG and METW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.77% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
