UNHG ranks 1st and METW 31st of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
METW vs UNHG
UNHG −0.23pt a year
1.00%0.77%
UNHG 43.5×the volume
17.1K744K
METW vs UNHG Performance
−1.2%+18.8%
- METW 1.00%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- METW $22M
- UNHG $73M
- METW −1.2%
- UNHG +18.8%, better
- METW 46.43%
- UNHG
- METW 4
- UNHG 6
- METW 17.1K sh
- UNHG 744K sh, better
- METW $22.77
- UNHG $19.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | METW | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | B61Higher |
| Mission | A96Higher | A91 |
| Risk | A82 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | B63 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | B57 | |
| Durability | A73Higher | B67 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. METW and UNHG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
METWB
UNHGA
In short
METW Most leveraged single-stock funds reset daily. This one resets on the calendar week, targeting 120% of Meta's Friday-to-Friday total return, and pays shareholders weekly without selling a single call option.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
METW METW seeks weekly distributions and calendar-week returns before fees and expenses equal to 1.2 times the calendar-week total return of Meta common shares.
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
METW vs UNHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
METW vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying METW vs UNHG
$3,859
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
METW 1.00%
$18,688
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | METW | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $1,371 | $392 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $5,205 | $1,420 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $14,829 | $3,859 |
- 1.00%METW
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 312 funds
METW 196th cheapest of 312 funds
METW vs UNHG Dividends
- METW 46.43%
- UNHG
- METW $11.19
- UNHG
- METW $0.13
- UNHG $1.90
- METW Nov 9, 2026
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- METW Pays Nov 10, 2026
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- METW Weekly
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
METW vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- METW 43.1%UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- METW −0.40UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- METW −40.5%UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- METW 1.45UNHG 5.19
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.