SCMB ranks 2nd and MINO 25th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
MINO vs SCMB
SCMB −0.36pt a year
0.39%0.03%
SCMB 11.9×the volume
274K3.28M
MINO +1.5pt
+5.6%+4.1%
MINO vs SCMB Performance
+0.2%−0.6%
- MINO 0.39%
- SCMB 0.03%, better
- MINO $765M
- SCMB $4.07B
- MINO +0.2%, better
- SCMB −0.6%
- MINO 3.99%, better
- SCMB 3.70%
- MINO 591
- SCMB 8203
- MINO 274K sh
- SCMB 3.28M sh, better
- MINO $43.91
- SCMB $24.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MINO | SCMB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A98Higher | A96 |
| Risk | B62Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | A78 | A82Higher |
| Holdings | B64 | A81Higher |
| Durability | B64 | A72Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. MINO and SCMB are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MINOB
SCMBA
In short
MINO An actively run muni fund from PIMCO's credit desk: federally tax-free income hunted across the whole ratings ladder, with room for up to 30% junk munis. Most big muni ETFs simply track an index. This one shops.
SCMB Schwab's take on the core muni sleeve: three basis points, thousands of AMT-free bonds from across the country, and a monthly distribution. Bottom-of-the-table pricing, no frills attached.
Stated mandate
MINO The Fund seeks current income exempt from federal income tax and long-term capital appreciation.
SCMB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of an index representing the U.S. AMT-free municipal bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MINO vs SCMB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MINO vs SCMB Cost
Overpaying MINO vs SCMB
$7,260
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MINO 0.39%
$7,898
SCMB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MINO | SCMB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $55 | $650 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $216 | $2,509 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $638 | $7,260 |
- 0.39%MINO
- 0.03%SCMB, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
SCMB cheapest of 63 funds
MINO 47th cheapest of 63 funds
MINO vs SCMB Dividends
- MINO 3.99%, better
- SCMB 3.70%
- MINO $1.76
- SCMB $0.92
- MINO $0.14
- SCMB $0.09
- MINO Oct 1, 2026
- SCMB Oct 1, 2026
- MINO Oct 5, 2026
- SCMB Oct 7, 2026
- MINO Monthly
- SCMB Monthly
Distribution history
MINO vs SCMB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MINO 6.2%SCMB 5.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- MINO 0.19, betterSCMB −0.04
- Worst fall
- MINO −15.2%SCMB −6.7%
- Market sensitivity
- MINO 0.96SCMB 0.96Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.