Skip to content
etf.net

MJUN vs PSMO

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (June) ETF

MJUNCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

PSMOBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

MJUN0.49%PSMO0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

PSMO 12.2×the volume

MJUN666PSMO8.14K

MJUN vs PSMO Performance

Aug 7, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

−0.3%MJUN+0.9%PSMO

Aug 7, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. MJUN −0.3%. PSMO +0.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2%−1%2%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
MJUN 0.49%
PSMO 0.49%
Fund size
MJUN $2M
PSMO $117M
1Y total return
MJUN No data
PSMO +10.5%
Holdings
MJUN 4
PSMO 3
Avg volume (30D)
MJUN 666 sh
PSMO 8.14K sh, better
NAV per share
MJUN $32.41
PSMO $32.98
52W range

ETF.net Grade

MJUN: Cost 70, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 36, Holdings not scored, Durability 23. PSMO: Cost 70, Risk 47, Mission 95, Tradability 66, Holdings not scored, Durability 66.
Pillar letters and Scores for MJUN, PSMO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarMJUNPSMO
Cost30% weightA70A70
Mission25% weightNot scoredA95
Risk15% weightC45C47Higher
Tradability15% weightD36B66Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightF23B66Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. MJUN and PSMO are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMO ranks 1st and MJUN 33rd of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 60
  3. Rank 33CMFEBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (February) ETFScore 40
  4. Rank 33CMJUNPacer Swan SOS Moderate (June) ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 33CMMARPacer Swan SOS Moderate (March) ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MJUNCPacer Swan SOS Moderate (June) ETF

PSMOBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

In short

MJUN No data

PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.

Stated mandate

MJUN No data

PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.

Why people hold it

MJUN No data

  • PSMO Charges 0.49% a year versus a 0.79% median across its 15%-buffer peer group, one of the lower-cost ways to own this structure.
  • Pacer's moderate SOS funds (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ) all price at 0.49%, while the Innovator power-buffer lineup (POCT, PJUL, PJAN) runs 0.79%.
  • The reference asset is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, not an abstract index, so what's being buffered is a fund you can watch tick by tick.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

MJUN No data

  • PSMO Buffer and cap are engineered for the full one-year outcome period running October through September. Buy or sell mid-period and you may get neither in full.paceretfs.com
  • Upside stops at a cap reset each October. A runaway rally in the S&P 500 is the scenario this structure hands back in exchange for the 15% cushion.paceretfs.com
  • One of the quieter tickers in the buffer aisle, so spreads and order type matter more here than with the category's household names.

Full MJUN profile⁠

Full PSMO profile⁠

MJUN vs PSMO Holdings

How MJUN and PSMO differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors99.1%
  • Asset classStocks100%
  • Countryby domicile99.99%

Sector

Sector weights in MJUN and PSMO, widest gap first
SectorMore in MJUNMore in PSMOGap
TechnologyMJUN +1.0 points
Health CarePSMO +0.3 points
Consumer StaplesPSMO +0.2 points
EnergyPSMO +0.1 points
FinancialsPSMO +0.1 points
Consumer DiscretionaryPSMO +0.1 points
CommunicationSame weight
UtilitiesPSMO +0.1 points
Real EstateSame weight
MaterialsSame weight
IndustrialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in MJUN and PSMO, widest gap first
CountryMore in MJUNMore in PSMOGap
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoPSMO +0.1 points
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • MJUN102.3%
  • PSMO104.0%

Securities held

  • MJUN2
  • PSMO2

Asset class

MJUN
Stocks
PSMO
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in MJUN2
  • In both0
  • Only in PSMO2

Only in MJUN

2 securities, 98.3% of MJUN by weight

  • Spy 05/28/2027 8.19 C93.83%
  • Spy 05/28/2027 737.83 P4.49%

Only in PSMO

2 securities, 100% of PSMO by weight

  • Spy 09/30/2027 8.47 C96.22%
  • Spy 09/30/2027 762.71 P6.87%

Weight gaps

MJUN and PSMO share no securities.

All 6 MJUN holdings⁠All 6 PSMO holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MJUN vs PSMO Cost

Same expense ratio

$9,792

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • MJUN 0.49%

    $9,792

  • PSMO 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • MJUN 0.49%
  • PSMO 0.49%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530MJUN $9,792PSMO $9,792

Year by year

YearMJUNPSMO
10$883$883
20$3,394$3,394
30$9,792$9,792

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%MJUN
  • 0.49%PSMO
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

MJUN 5th cheapest of 51 funds

PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds

MJUN vs PSMO Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
MJUN None
PSMO None

Distribution history

MJUNAll MJUN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMOAll PSMO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

MJUN vs PSMO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
MJUN No dataPSMO 5.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
MJUN No dataPSMO 1.31
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
MJUN No dataPSMO −9.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
MJUN 0.40PSMO 0.41

Popular comparisons

  • MJUNCvsPSMJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (June) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSMOBvsPSMJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MJUNCvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (June) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSMOBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MJUNCvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (June) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSMOBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.