XLII ranks 2nd and MLPD 12th of 22 funds in the Sector Option Income Category.
MLPD vs XLII
XLII −0.25pt a year
0.60%0.35%
XLII 1.3×the volume
12.5K15.9K
MLPD vs XLII Performance
+16.3%+9.0%
- MLPD 0.60%
- XLII 0.35%, better
- MLPD $26M
- XLII $17M
- MLPD +16.3%, better
- XLII +9.0%
- MLPD 13.82%, better
- XLII 13.46%
- MLPD 2
- XLII 3
- MLPD 12.5K sh
- XLII 15.9K sh, better
- MLPD $24.95
- XLII $24.32
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MLPD | XLII |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C45 | A76Higher |
| Mission | C50 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A93Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | D32 | B60Higher |
| Holdings | B57Higher | C51 |
| Durability | B64Higher | C51 |
Rank among Sector Option Income funds
Same Category. MLPD and XLII are both graded against the same 22 Sector Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MLPDC
XLIIA
In short
MLPD Pipelines already pay. MLPD holds Global X's midstream energy basket and sells at-the-money calls against it, trading most of the upside for option premium, distributed monthly.
XLII Covered calls swarm tech; far rarer on machinery, railroads and defense primes. XLII owns the 1998-vintage industrials SPDR and sells short-dated calls on that fund itself, paying out monthly.
Stated mandate
MLPD The fund seeks to track the Cboe MLPX ATM BuyWrite Index before fees and expenses and implements the strategy by holding MLPX while selling corresponding call options on it.
XLII The fund is actively managed to pursue current income while retaining the potential for long-term capital growth. It invests in XLI and sells call options on XLI to generate additional income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MLPD vs XLII Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MLPD vs XLII Cost
Overpaying MLPD vs XLII
$4,691
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MLPD 0.60%
$11,817
XLII 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MLPD | XLII | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $634 | $442 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $2,454 | $1,662 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $7,126 | $4,691 |
- 0.60%MLPD
- 0.35%XLII, cheaper
- Middle half of Sector Option Income funds
- Median 0.47%
XLII cheapest of 22 funds
MLPD 12th cheapest of 22 funds
MLPD vs XLII Dividends
- MLPD 13.82%, better
- XLII 13.46%
- MLPD $3.45
- XLII $3.23
- MLPD $0.25
- XLII $0.30
- MLPD Oct 19, 2026
- XLII Oct 1, 2026
- MLPD Oct 22, 2026
- XLII Oct 5, 2026
- MLPD Monthly
- XLII Monthly
Distribution history
MLPD vs XLII Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MLPD 7.9%XLII 11.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- MLPD 1.07XLII 0.60
- Worst fall
- MLPD −12.9%XLII −10.1%
- Market sensitivity
- MLPD 0.04XLII 0.53
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.