Skip to content

MPLY vs QIDX

Strategy Shares Monopoly ETF

MPLYDCboe

Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF

QIDXBNYSE Arca

Overlap

14.1%by weight

Expense ratio

QIDX −0.29pt a year

MPLY0.79%QIDX0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

MPLY 1.3×the volume

MPLY4.98KQIDX3.94K

MPLY vs QIDX Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+3.4%MPLY+8.7%QIDX

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. MPLY +3.4%. QIDX +8.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%0%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
MPLY 0.79%
QIDX 0.50%, better
Fund size
MPLY $18M
QIDX $39M
1Y total return
MPLY +3.4%
QIDX +8.7%, better
Yield (12M)
MPLY No data
QIDX 0.91%
Holdings
MPLY 101
QIDX 130
Avg volume (30D)
MPLY 4.98K sh, better
QIDX 3.94K sh
NAV per share
MPLY $32.56
QIDX $11.55
52W range

ETF.net Grade

MPLY: Cost 19, Risk 22, Mission not scored, Tradability 42, Holdings 35, Durability 24. QIDX: Cost 75, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 23, Holdings 93, Durability 45.
Pillar letters and Scores for MPLY, QIDX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarMPLYQIDX
Cost30% weightF19A75Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF22A76Higher
Tradability15% weightC42HigherF23
Holdings10% weightD35A93Higher
Durability5% weightF24C45Higher

Rank among US Active Quality funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. MPLY and QIDX are both graded against the same 16 US Active Quality funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Quality⁠

Category · 16 funds
See all 16 ›

QIDX ranks 4th and MPLY 15th of 16 funds in the US Active Quality Category.

  1. Rank 1ANPFENpf Core Equity EtfScore 79
  2. Rank 2AQLTYGMO US Quality ETFScore 75
  3. Rank 3BAQECAQE Core ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BQIDXIndexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETFScore 64
  5. Rank 5BQFFQualivian Focus Fund ETFScore 58
  6. Rank 14DGRWTCW Durable Growth ETFScore 30
  7. Rank 15DMPLYStrategy Shares Monopoly ETFScore 26
  8. OTAXNot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MPLYDStrategy Shares Monopoly ETF

QIDXBIndexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF

In short

MPLY No data

QIDX An active quality fund stitched from Indexperts' own house indexes: steady-earnings names across large, mid and small caps, with a manager free to override the rules. It charges less than the typical fund in its peer group.

Stated mandate

MPLY No data

QIDX The Fund seeks total return.

Why people hold it

MPLY No data

  • QIDX Charges 0.50% a year, below the median for its quality-focused peer group and about half what the priciest name in that group (EQTY, 0.99%) asks.
  • Rules first, judgment second: the portfolio is drawn from Indexperts' own growth and consistent-value indexes, with the advisor free to trim or exclude.sec.gov
  • Reaches across large, mid and small caps instead of hugging a handful of mega caps, and the portfolio build ranks among the stronger ones in its peer group.sec.gov
  • A plain 1940 Act equity fund seeking total return, with cash paid out quarterly. No leverage, no options overlay, no derivatives wrapper to decode.

Worth knowing

MPLY No data

  • QIDX Listed at the end of 2024, so the track record is short and any read on its risk profile rests on limited history.
  • Small and thinly traded: spreads can run wider than on giant index funds, and size of order matters more.
  • You are paying 0.50% for a manager's judgment when index-built quality rivals like PSET run 0.15%.

Full MPLY profile⁠

Full QIDX profile⁠

MPLY vs QIDX Holdings

How MPLY and QIDX differ

Overlap by weight

14.1%

Shared holdings make up 32.8% of MPLY and 23.5% of QIDX.

Level by level

  • Holdings24 in both14.1%
  • Countryby domicile93.5%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for QIDX.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in MPLY and QIDX, widest gap first
CountryMore in MPLYMore in QIDX
United StatesQIDX +5.4 points
TaiwanMPLY +5.0 points
NetherlandsMPLY +1.6 points
SingaporeQIDX +0.6 points
SwedenQIDX +0.5 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • MPLY62.2%
  • QIDX25.0%

Securities held

  • MPLY100
  • QIDX129

Asset class

MPLY
Equity
QIDX
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in MPLY76
  • In both24
  • Only in QIDX105

Only in MPLY

76 securities, 66.9% of MPLY by weight

  • NVIDIA Corp10.01%
  • Alphabet Inc7.67%
  • Amazon.com Inc.5.84%

Only in QIDX

105 securities, 74.0% of QIDX by weight

  • Arista Networks, Inc.3.56%
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.3.36%
  • Alphabet Inc. Class A2.59%

Weight gaps

All 24 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in MPLY and QIDX, widest gap first
HoldingMore in MPLYMore in QIDX
Microsoft CorpMSFTMPLY +8.13 points
Apple Inc.AAPLMPLY +7.20 points
Eli Lilly and CompanyLLYMPLY +1.91 points
Cencora IncCORQIDX +1.65 points
S&P Global IncSPGIQIDX +1.08 points
Stryker CorpSYKQIDX +0.95 points
Abbott LaboratoriesABTQIDX +0.78 points
Cisco Systems Inc.CSCOQIDX +0.77 points

All 101 MPLY holdings⁠All 130 QIDX holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MPLY vs QIDX Cost

Overpaying MPLY vs QIDX

$5,195

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • MPLY 0.79%

    $15,174

  • QIDX 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • MPLY 0.79%
  • QIDX 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530MPLY $15,174QIDX $9,979

Year by year

YearMPLYQIDXOverpaying
10$1,405$900$505
20$5,331$3,460$1,871
30$15,174$9,979$5,195

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%MPLY
  • 0.50%QIDX, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Quality funds
  • Median 0.65%

QIDX 4th cheapest of 16 funds

MPLY 13th cheapest of 16 funds

MPLY vs QIDX Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
MPLY No data
QIDX 0.91%
Payout (12M)
MPLY No data
QIDX $0.11
Last payment
MPLY $0.04
QIDX $0.03
Ex-dividend
MPLY Dec 29, 2025
QIDX Sep 29, 2026
Paid on
MPLY Dec 30, 2025
QIDX Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
MPLY Irregular
QIDX Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

MPLYIrregular · 1 paymentAll MPLY payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 29, 2025 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.032026YTD
QIDXQuarterly · 7 paymentsAll QIDX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 7 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Mar 28, 2025 $0.02; Jun 27, 2025 $0.02; Sep 29, 2025 $0.02; Dec 30, 2025 $0.03; Mar 30, 2026 $0.03; Jun 29, 2026 $0.03; Sep 29, 2026 $0.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.032026YTD

MPLY vs QIDX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
MPLY 16.8%since Jun 2025QIDX 9.9%since Feb 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
MPLY 0.86since Jun 2025QIDX 0.25since Feb 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
MPLY −13.4%since May 2025QIDX −15.0%since Jan 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
MPLY 1.37QIDX 0.57

Popular comparisons

  • MPLYDvsNPFEA

    Strategy Shares Monopoly ETF · Npf Core Equity Etf

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QIDXBvsNPFEA

    Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF · Npf Core Equity Etf

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MPLYDvsQLTYA

    Strategy Shares Monopoly ETF · GMO US Quality ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QIDXBvsQLTYA

    Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF · GMO US Quality ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MPLYDvsAQECB

    Strategy Shares Monopoly ETF · AQE Core ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QIDXBvsAQECB

    Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF · AQE Core ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.