MPLY vs QLTY: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

Strategy Shares Monopoly ETF

MPLYDCboe

GMO US Quality ETF

QLTYANYSE Arca

Overlap

38.0%by weight

Expense ratio

QLTY −0.29pt a year

MPLY0.79%QLTY0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

QLTY 80.7×the volume

MPLY4.98KQLTY402K

MPLY vs QLTY Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+3.4%MPLY+17.2%QLTY

Expense ratio: MPLY 0.79%; QLTY 0.50%, better
Fund size: MPLY $18M; QLTY $5.4B
1Y total return: MPLY +3.4%; QLTY +17.2%, better
Yield (12M): MPLY No data; QLTY 0.65%
Holdings: MPLY 101; QLTY 47
Avg volume (30D): MPLY 4.98K sh; QLTY 402K sh, better
NAV per share: MPLY $32.56; QLTY $43.53
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for MPLY, QLTY, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	MPLY	QLTY
Cost30% weight	F19	A75Higher
Mission25% weight	Not scored	A77
Risk15% weight	F22	B68Higher
Tradability15% weight	C42	A80Higher
Holdings10% weight	D35	A75Higher
Durability5% weight	F24	A89Higher

Rank among US Active Quality funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. MPLY and QLTY are both graded against the same 16 US Active Quality funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Quality⁠

Category · 16 funds

See all 16 ›

QLTY ranks 2nd and MPLY 15th of 16 funds in the US Active Quality Category.

Rank 1ANPFENpf Core Equity EtfScore 79
Rank 2AQLTYGMO US Quality ETFScore 75
Rank 3BAQECAQE Core ETFScore 66
Rank 14DGRWTCW Durable Growth ETFScore 30
Rank 15DMPLYStrategy Shares Monopoly ETFScore 26
OTAXNot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MPLYDStrategy Shares Monopoly ETF

QLTYAGMO US Quality ETF

In short

MPLY No data

QLTY Most quality ETFs run a rules screen. QLTY hands the job to GMO's stock pickers, who buy US companies they judge high quality and chase plain total return. Active conviction, priced like it: 0.50% a year.

Stated mandate

MPLY No data

QLTY The Fund seeks total return. It is actively managed and invests primarily in equities of U.S. companies that GMO believes are high quality.

Why people hold it

MPLY No data

QLTY Actively managed, not index-tracking. GMO's team chooses the US companies it considers high quality, under a straightforward total-return mandate instead of a published factor formula.
GMO's read on quality leans toward wide moats and free cash flow, so the lineup can look meaningfully different from the index-built quality funds it sits beside.
Opened in 2023 and already a multi-billion-dollar fund with moderate daily trading and a quarterly distribution schedule.
The filings match the label: a standard 1940-Act fund holding US equities, screened on quality, no derivative wrapper or offshore complexity.

Worth knowing

MPLY No data

QLTY The 0.50% fee runs above the typical quality-cohort charge, and index-built rivals undercut it hard: QUAL at 0.15%, JQUA at 0.12%.
No index to fall back on. Everything rides on GMO's stock selection, and the ETF's own record only starts in 2023.
Mostly on that fee, it sits in the lower half of its US quality peer group even though it does the job its documents describe.

Full MPLY profile⁠

Full QLTY profile⁠

MPLY vs QLTY Holdings

How MPLY and QLTY differ

Overlap by weight

38.0%

Shared holdings make up 60.6% of QLTY and 54.7% of MPLY.

Level by level

Holdings24 in both38.0%
Sector9 Sectors77.0%
Countryby domicile93.5%
Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in MPLY and QLTY, widest gap first
Sector	More in MPLYMore in QLTY	MPLY	QLTY
Health Care	QLTY +16.3 points	7.3%	23.6%
Technology	MPLY +12.4 points	50.5%	38.1%
Industrials	MPLY +4.0 points	7.9%	3.9%
Consumer Staples	QLTY +4.1 points	2.8%	6.9%
Consumer Discretionary	MPLY +3.2 points	10.2%	7.0%
Communication	MPLY +2.9 points	14.8%	11.9%
Financials	QLTY +2.6 points	5.5%	8.1%
Real Estate	MPLY +0.3 points	0.3%	0.0%
Materials	MPLY +0.2 points	0.8%	0.6%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in MPLY and QLTY, widest gap first
Country	More in MPLYMore in QLTY	MPLY	QLTY
United States	QLTY +6.5 points	93.5%	100.0%
Taiwan	MPLY +5.0 points	5.0%	0.0%
Netherlands	MPLY +1.6 points	1.6%	0.0%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

MPLY62.2%
QLTY42.3%

Securities held

MPLY100
QLTY46

Asset class

MPLY: Equity
QLTY: Equity

Holdings

Only in MPLY76
In both24
Only in QLTY22

Only in MPLY

76 securities, 45.0% of MPLY by weight

Alphabet Inc7.67%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manu4.78%
Space Exploration Technol4.36%
Tesla Inc3.81%
Walmart Inc.2.34%
Advanced Micro Devices2.05%
Asml Holding NV1.48%
AbbVie Inc.1.22%
Costco Wholesale Corp.1.05%
Palantir Technologies Inc1.04%
Cisco Systems Inc.0.98%
Oracle Corp.0.91%
Applied Materials Inc.0.77%
Caterpillar Inc.0.73%
Amgen Inc0.60%
New Linde PLC0.58%
American Express Co.0.52%
Deere & Co.0.45%
BlackRock Funding Inc/De0.44%
Qualcomm Inc.0.42%
T-Mobile Us Inc0.40%
Blackstone Inc0.36%
Lockheed Martin Corp.0.35%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals0.34%
S&P Global Inc0.32%
Parker-Hannifin Corp0.28%
Lowe's Cos Inc0.27%
Automatic Data Processing0.26%
Hca Healthcare Inc0.26%
Cme Group Inc.0.26%
Servicenow Inc0.25%
Equinix Inc0.24%
Fortinet Inc0.24%
Adobe Inc0.23%
Csx Corp0.23%
Waste Management Inc.0.22%
Cadence Design Systems0.22%
Intercontinental Exchange0.22%
Intuit Inc.0.21%
Cintas Corp.0.20%
Sherwin-Williams Co0.20%
Applovin Corp0.19%
Northrop Grumman Corp.0.18%
Republic Services Inc0.18%
Aon PLC0.17%
Apollo Global Management0.17%
Boston Scientific Corp.0.15%
Cencora Inc0.14%
Transdigm Group Inc0.14%
Nasdaq Inc0.14%

Only in QLTY

22 securities, 39.0% of QLTY by weight

Johnson & Johnson4.46%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc4.36%
Alphabet Inc Class A4.18%
Procter & Gamble Co/The2.10%
Aramark1.92%
Hilton Worldwide Holdings In1.90%
Us Bancorp1.76%
Coca Cola Co/The1.75%
Accenture PLC Class A1.72%
Merck & Co. Inc.1.61%
General Electric1.59%
Elevance Health Inc1.53%
Constellation Brands Inc A1.43%
Tjx Companies Inc1.26%
Roper Technologies Inc1.23%
Tradeweb Markets Inc Class A1.10%
Philip Morris International1.09%
Martin Marietta Materials1.05%
Quest Diagnostics Inc1.04%
Brown Forman Corp Class B0.85%
State Str Instl Invt Tr0.57%
Ferguson Enterprises Inc0.53%

Weight gaps

All 24 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in MPLY and QLTY, widest gap first
Holding	More in MPLYMore in QLTY	MPLY	QLTY
NVIDIA CorpNVDA	MPLY +6.87 points	10.01%	3.14%
Apple Inc.AAPL	MPLY +6.26 points	9.64%	3.38%
Texas Instruments Inc.TXN	QLTY +3.20 points	0.67%	3.87%
Lam Research CorpLRCX	QLTY +2.59 points	0.75%	3.34%
Amazon.com Inc.AMZN	MPLY +2.29 points	5.84%	3.55%
Abbott LaboratoriesABT	QLTY +2.01 points	0.43%	2.44%
UnitedHealth Group Inc.UNH	QLTY +1.72 points	0.89%	2.61%
Salesforce IncCRM	QLTY +1.65 points	0.43%	2.08%
Kla CorpKLAC	QLTY +1.62 points	0.53%	2.15%
Netflix.com Inc.NFLX	QLTY +1.57 points	0.62%	2.19%
Synopsys IncSNPS	QLTY +1.49 points	0.20%	1.69%
Cigna Group/TheCI	QLTY +1.43 points	0.19%	1.62%
Mastercard Inc - AMA	QLTY +1.10 points	1.34%	2.44%
Microsoft CorpMSFT	MPLY +0.87 points	8.80%	7.93%
Intuitive Surgical Inc.ISRG	QLTY +0.83 points	0.37%	1.20%
Uber Technologies IncUBER	QLTY +0.76 points	0.32%	1.08%
Jack Henry & Assoc.JKHY	QLTY +0.63 points	0.03%	0.66%
Stryker CorpSYK	QLTY +0.57 points	0.26%	0.83%
Moody's CorporationMCO	QLTY +0.56 points	0.20%	0.76%
Visa IncV	QLTY +0.54 points	1.92%	2.46%
Broadcom IncAVGO	MPLY +0.31 points	3.56%	3.25%
Meta Platforms IncMETA	QLTY +0.26 points	3.73%	3.99%
Home Depot IncHD	QLTY +0.11 points	0.79%	0.90%
Eli Lilly and CompanyLLY	MPLY +0.09 points	3.15%	3.06%

All 101 MPLY holdings⁠All QLTY holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MPLY vs QLTY Cost

Overpaying MPLY vs QLTY

$5,195

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

MPLY 0.79%
$15,174
QLTY 0.50%
$9,979

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

MPLY 0.79%
QLTY 0.50%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	MPLY	QLTY	Overpaying
10	$1,405	$900	$505
20	$5,331	$3,460	$1,871
30	$15,174	$9,979	$5,195

Expense ratio

0.79%MPLY
0.50%QLTY, cheaper

QLTY0.50%MPLY0.79%

0.40%1.52%

Middle half of US Active Quality funds
Median 0.65%

QLTY 4th cheapest of 16 funds

MPLY 13th cheapest of 16 funds

MPLY vs QLTY Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026

Yield (12M): MPLY No data; QLTY 0.65%
Payout (12M): MPLY No data; QLTY $0.28
Last payment: MPLY $0.04; QLTY $0.06
Ex-dividend: MPLY Dec 29, 2025; QLTY Sep 30, 2026
Paid on: MPLY Dec 30, 2025; QLTY Oct 1, 2026
Frequency: MPLY Irregular; QLTY Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

MPLYIrregular · 1 paymentAll MPLY payments⁠

QLTYQuarterly · 12 paymentsAll QLTY payments⁠

MPLY vs QLTY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: MPLY 16.8%since Jun 2025QLTY 11.9%since Dec 2023
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: MPLY 0.86since Jun 2025QLTY 1.27since Dec 2023
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: MPLY −13.4%since May 2025QLTY −17.0%since Nov 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: MPLY 1.37QLTY 0.98; Market = 1

Popular comparisons

MPLYDvsNPFEA
Strategy Shares Monopoly ETF · Npf Core Equity Etf
Expense ratio
0.79% · 0.40%
Category
QLTYAvsNPFEA
GMO US Quality ETF · Npf Core Equity Etf
Expense ratio
0.50% · 0.40%
Category
MPLYDvsAQECB
Strategy Shares Monopoly ETF · AQE Core ETF
Expense ratio
0.79% · 0.49%
Category
QLTYAvsAQECB
GMO US Quality ETF · AQE Core ETF
Expense ratio
0.50% · 0.49%
Category
MPLYDvsQIDXB
Strategy Shares Monopoly ETF · Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF
Expense ratio
0.79% · 0.50%
Category
QLTYAvsQIDXB
GMO US Quality ETF · Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF
Expense ratio
0.50% · 0.50%
Category