QLD ranks 1st and MVV 9th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
MVV vs QLD
QLD −0.06pt a year
0.95%0.89%
QLD 463.2×the volume
8.95K4.15M
QLD +19.1pt
+12.8%+31.9%
MVV vs QLD Performance
+23.0%+97.9%
- MVV 0.95%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- MVV $147M
- QLD $13.3B
- MVV +20.8%, better
- QLD +10.7%
- MVV 0.65%, better
- QLD 0.15%
- MVV 402
- QLD 113
- MVV 8.95K sh
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- MVV $81.67
- QLD $82.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MVV | QLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51 | A72Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | A71Higher | B66 |
| Tradability | A77 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | A83Higher | A72 |
| Durability | A76 | A81Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. MVV and QLD are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MVVB
QLDA
In short
MVV Geared ETFs mostly chase the Nasdaq or mega-cap tech. MVV points the same machinery at the forgotten middle of the market: 2x the daily move of the S&P MidCap 400, running since 2006.
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
Stated mandate
MVV MVV seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. The objective applies to each day, not to holding periods longer than one day.
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MVV vs QLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MVV vs QLD Cost
Overpaying MVV vs QLD
$997
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MVV 0.95%
$17,869
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MVV | QLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,576 | $102 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $5,953 | $369 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $16,872 | $997 |
- 0.95%MVV
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
MVV 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
MVV vs QLD Dividends
- MVV 0.65%, better
- QLD 0.15%
- MVV $0.53
- QLD $0.12
- MVV $0.08
- QLD $0.03
- MVV Sep 23, 2026
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- MVV Sep 29, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- MVV Quarterly
- QLD Quarterly
Distribution history
MVV vs QLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- MVV
- QLD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MVV 30.4%, betterQLD 36.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- MVV 0.74QLD 1.04, better
- Worst fall
- MVV −45.5%, betterQLD −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- MVV 2.04QLD 2.46
MVV and QLD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
