Skip to content

NBFR vs PQJA

Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF

NBFRDNYSE Arca

PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January

PQJABNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

PQJA −0.29pt a year

NBFR0.79%PQJA0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

NBFR 1.01×the volume

NBFR5.17KPQJA5.11K

NBFR vs PQJA Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−1.4%NBFR+2.2%PQJA

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. NBFR −1.4%. PQJA +2.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%1%3%4%5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
NBFR 0.79%
PQJA 0.50%, better
Fund size
NBFR $21M
PQJA $35M
1Y total return
NBFR No data
PQJA +12.5%
Holdings
NBFR 49
PQJA 4
Avg volume (30D)
NBFR 5.17K sh, better
PQJA 5.11K sh
NAV per share
NBFR $25.69
PQJA $32.65
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NBFR: Cost 46, Risk 15, Mission not scored, Tradability 12, Holdings 76, Durability 10. PQJA: Cost 76, Risk 62, Mission not scored, Tradability 39, Holdings not scored, Durability 49.
Pillar letters and Scores for NBFR, PQJA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNBFRPQJA
Cost30% weightC46A76Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF15B62Higher
Tradability15% weightF12D39Higher
Holdings10% weightA76Not scored
Durability5% weightF10C49Higher

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NBFR and PQJA are both graded against the same 12 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 12 funds
See all 12 ›

PQJA ranks 2nd and NBFR 12th of 12 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPQAPPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - AprilScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPQJAPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - JanuaryScore 62
  3. Rank 2BQTRGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETFScore 62
  4. Rank 11CQSPTFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - SeptemberScore 41
  5. Rank 12DNBFRInnovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETFScore 34

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NBFRDInnovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF

PQJABPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January

In short

NBFR Innovator's Nasdaq-100 buffer, minus the calendar. NBFR spreads its options across a laddered set of periods with a manager steering them, aiming to absorb roughly the first 10% to 14% of index losses.

PQJA A one-year seatbelt on the Nasdaq-100: PQJA absorbs the first 12% of price losses on the index's flagship ETF and gives up gains above a cap in exchange. A deeper cushion than most of its buffer peers, at 0.50% a year.

Stated mandate

NBFR The Fund seeks capital appreciation through Nasdaq-100 equity exposure while using an actively managed, laddered options strategy to reduce volatility and protect approximately 10% to 14% of reference-asset losses.

PQJA The Fund seeks to match QQQ’s price return up to a predetermined cap while buffering the first 12% of QQQ losses over a one-year target outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • NBFR Laddered by design: protection is staggered across overlapping option periods instead of hinging on one annual reset date, so entry timing matters less.
  • Actively managed, not rules-on-rails: a manager runs the option ladder with a stated goal of damping volatility on Nasdaq-100 exposure.
  • Fee sits at the middle of its Nasdaq-100 buffer peer group at 0.79%, the same sticker as Innovator's date-locked sibling QBUF.
  • PQJA Cushions the first 12% of the tracked Nasdaq-100 ETF's price losses over each one-year outcome period, deeper than the 10-point buffer on Innovator's QBUF.pgim.com
  • Charges 0.50% a year against a 0.79% median for its Nasdaq-100 buffer cohort, where QBUF sits at 0.79%.
  • January is one of four PGIM Nasdaq-100 buffer funds on a quarterly calendar (PQAP, PQJL, PQOC), so outcome periods aren't tied to a single start month.
  • Launched in 2024 and rated in the upper half of its shallow-buffer Nasdaq-100 group on our review.

Worth knowing

  • NBFR Cheaper routes to Nasdaq-100 buffering exist in the same cohort: PGIM's dated buffer funds charge 0.50% and Global X's QTR 0.25%.
  • Launched in 2026, so the record is short, and it trades lightly next to the category's household names, which can mean wider spreads.
  • The buffer is a slice, not a floor: roughly 10% to 14% of index declines. Losses past that pass through to shareholders.
  • PQJA Upside stops at a cap that resets with each new one-year period, and the mandate follows price return, so index dividends aren't part of the payoff.
  • The 12% buffer and the cap are measured across a full outcome period. Buy partway through and your effective cushion and ceiling differ from the headline terms.pgim.com
  • A small, thinly traded fund next to the largest buffer products, which can show up as wider bid-ask spreads.

Full NBFR profile⁠

Full PQJA profile⁠

NBFR vs PQJA Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NBFR vs PQJA Cost

Overpaying NBFR vs PQJA

$5,195

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NBFR 0.79%

    $15,174

  • PQJA 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NBFR 0.79%
  • PQJA 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530NBFR $15,174PQJA $9,979

Year by year

YearNBFRPQJAOverpaying
10$1,405$900$505
20$5,331$3,460$1,871
30$15,174$9,979$5,195

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%NBFR
  • 0.50%PQJA, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PQJA 2nd cheapest of 12 funds

NBFR 6th cheapest of 12 funds

NBFR vs PQJA Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Last payment
NBFR $0.006
PQJA $0.0015
Ex-dividend
NBFR Mar 31, 2026
PQJA Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
NBFR Apr 1, 2026
PQJA Jan 2, 2026
Frequency
NBFR Irregular
PQJA Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

NBFRIrregular · 1 paymentAll NBFR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Mar 31, 2026 $0.006. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.0052026YTD
PQJAIrregular · 1 paymentAll PQJA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.0015. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.0052026YTD

NBFR vs PQJA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NBFR No dataPQJA 10.0%since Feb 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NBFR No dataPQJA 0.99since Feb 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NBFR No dataPQJA −14.7%since Jan 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NBFR 0.56PQJA 0.74

Popular comparisons

  • NBFRDvsPQAPB

    Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PQJABvsPQAPB

    PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NBFRDvsQTRB

    Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF · Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PQJABvsQTRB

    PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January · Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NBFRDvsPQOCB

    Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PQJABvsPQOCB

    PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.