PQJA ranks 2nd and NBFR 12th of 12 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% Category.
NBFR vs PQJA
PQJA −0.29pt a year
0.79%0.50%
NBFR 1.01×the volume
5.17K5.11K
NBFR vs PQJA Performance
−1.4%+2.2%
- NBFR 0.79%
- PQJA 0.50%, better
- NBFR $21M
- PQJA $35M
- NBFR
- PQJA +12.5%
- NBFR 49
- PQJA 4
- NBFR 5.17K sh, better
- PQJA 5.11K sh
- NBFR $25.69
- PQJA $32.65
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NBFR | PQJA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C46 | A76Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F15 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | F12 | D39Higher |
| Holdings | A76 | |
| Durability | F10 | C49Higher |
Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. NBFR and PQJA are both graded against the same 12 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NBFRD
PQJAB
In short
NBFR Innovator's Nasdaq-100 buffer, minus the calendar. NBFR spreads its options across a laddered set of periods with a manager steering them, aiming to absorb roughly the first 10% to 14% of index losses.
PQJA A one-year seatbelt on the Nasdaq-100: PQJA absorbs the first 12% of price losses on the index's flagship ETF and gives up gains above a cap in exchange. A deeper cushion than most of its buffer peers, at 0.50% a year.
Stated mandate
NBFR The Fund seeks capital appreciation through Nasdaq-100 equity exposure while using an actively managed, laddered options strategy to reduce volatility and protect approximately 10% to 14% of reference-asset losses.
PQJA The Fund seeks to match QQQ’s price return up to a predetermined cap while buffering the first 12% of QQQ losses over a one-year target outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NBFR vs PQJA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NBFR vs PQJA Cost
Overpaying NBFR vs PQJA
$5,195
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NBFR 0.79%
$15,174
PQJA 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NBFR | PQJA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $900 | $505 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $3,460 | $1,871 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $9,979 | $5,195 |
- 0.79%NBFR
- 0.50%PQJA, cheaper
- Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
PQJA 2nd cheapest of 12 funds
NBFR 6th cheapest of 12 funds
NBFR vs PQJA Dividends
- NBFR $0.006
- PQJA $0.0015
- NBFR Mar 31, 2026
- PQJA Dec 30, 2025
- NBFR Apr 1, 2026
- PQJA Jan 2, 2026
- NBFR Irregular
- PQJA Irregular
Distribution history
NBFR vs PQJA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NBFR PQJA 10.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- NBFR PQJA 0.99
- Worst fall
- NBFR PQJA −14.7%
- Market sensitivity
- NBFR 0.56PQJA 0.74
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.