Skip to content

NBFR vs QTR

Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF

NBFRDNYSE Arca

Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF

QTRBNasdaq

Overlap

67.0%by weight

Expense ratio

QTR −0.54pt a year

NBFR0.79%QTR0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

NBFR 3.1×the volume

NBFR5.17KQTR1.67K

NBFR vs QTR Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−1.4%NBFR−1.4%QTR

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. NBFR −1.4%. QTR −1.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.2%4%6%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
NBFR 0.79%
QTR 0.25%, better
Fund size
NBFR $21M
QTR $10M
1Y total return
NBFR No data
QTR +4.6%
Yield (12M)
NBFR No data
QTR 17.33%
Holdings
NBFR 49
QTR 105
Avg volume (30D)
NBFR 5.17K sh, better
QTR 1.67K sh
NAV per share
NBFR $25.69
QTR $32.70
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NBFR: Cost 46, Risk 15, Mission not scored, Tradability 12, Holdings 76, Durability 10. QTR: Cost 97, Risk 14, Mission not scored, Tradability 32, Holdings 85, Durability 38.
Pillar letters and Scores for NBFR, QTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNBFRQTR
Cost30% weightC46A97Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF15HigherF14
Tradability15% weightF12D32Higher
Holdings10% weightA76A85Higher
Durability5% weightF10D38Higher

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NBFR and QTR are both graded against the same 12 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 12 funds
See all 12 ›

QTR ranks 2nd and NBFR 12th of 12 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPQAPPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - AprilScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPQJAPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - JanuaryScore 62
  3. Rank 2BQTRGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETFScore 62
  4. Rank 4BPQOCPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - OctoberScore 61
  5. Rank 11CQSPTFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - SeptemberScore 41
  6. Rank 12DNBFRInnovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETFScore 34

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NBFRDInnovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF

QTRBGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF

In short

NBFR Innovator's Nasdaq-100 buffer, minus the calendar. NBFR spreads its options across a laddered set of periods with a manager steering them, aiming to absorb roughly the first 10% to 14% of index losses.

QTR QTR owns the Nasdaq-100 and buys puts 10% below the index, so it wears the first leg of a selloff and passes the deep-drop risk to the options market. Insurance you pay for, not a capped buffer.

Stated mandate

NBFR The Fund seeks capital appreciation through Nasdaq-100 equity exposure while using an actively managed, laddered options strategy to reduce volatility and protect approximately 10% to 14% of reference-asset losses.

QTR QTR seeks to buffer market selloffs through a protective-put strategy that owns Nasdaq-100 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts on the Nasdaq-100 Index. It aims to generally track the Nasdaq-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index's price and yield performance before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • NBFR Laddered by design: protection is staggered across overlapping option periods instead of hinging on one annual reset date, so entry timing matters less.
  • Actively managed, not rules-on-rails: a manager runs the option ladder with a stated goal of damping volatility on Nasdaq-100 exposure.
  • Fee sits at the middle of its Nasdaq-100 buffer peer group at 0.79%, the same sticker as Innovator's date-locked sibling QBUF.
  • QTR Protection is bought outright rather than funded by selling upside calls, so the trade-off is the running cost of the puts instead of a ceiling on gains.globalxetfs.com
  • 0.25% a year, a fraction of the going rate in its Nasdaq-100 downside-protection peer group, where 0.50% (PGIM's Buffer 12 series) to 0.79% (QBUF) is typical.
  • The puts roll on the quarterly schedule set by its index, so there is no defined outcome period to time an entry around.
  • Holds the Nasdaq-100 stocks directly, roughly 100 names, and sits among the stronger implementations in its peer group.

Worth knowing

  • NBFR Cheaper routes to Nasdaq-100 buffering exist in the same cohort: PGIM's dated buffer funds charge 0.50% and Global X's QTR 0.25%.
  • Launched in 2026, so the record is short, and it trades lightly next to the category's household names, which can mean wider spreads.
  • The buffer is a slice, not a floor: roughly 10% to 14% of index declines. Losses past that pass through to shareholders.
  • QTR The puts sit 10% out of the money. The first 10% of an index drop is fully yours; the hedge only engages past that.
  • You pay put premiums whether or not markets fall, a standing cost that weighs on results in calm and rising markets.
  • A small fund that trades thinly next to the big buffer franchises, so spreads can run wider. Limit orders help.

Full NBFR profile⁠

Full QTR profile⁠

NBFR vs QTR Holdings

As of

How NBFR and QTR differ

Overlap by weight

67.0%

Shared holdings make up 95.2% of NBFR and 68.0% of QTR.

Level by level

  • Asset classAlternatives, Equity0.0%
  • Holdings43 in both67.0%
  • Countryby domicile98.0%

Sector

No Sector split for NBFR.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in NBFR and QTR, widest gap first
CountryMore in NBFRMore in QTR
NetherlandsNBFR +1.1 points
CanadaQTR +1.1 points
United KingdomNBFR +0.9 points
Other countries (3)QTR +1.0 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • NBFR54.4%
  • QTR46.7%

Securities held

  • NBFR48
  • QTR104

Asset class

NBFR
Alternatives
QTR
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in NBFR5
  • In both43
  • Only in QTR61

Only in NBFR

5 securities, 7.8% of NBFR by weight

  • Qqq 09/30/2027 743 P2.50%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20372.50%
  • Qqq 06/30/2027 735 P2.20%

Only in QTR

61 securities, 31.9% of QTR by weight

  • Cisco Systems Inc1.87%
  • Costco Wholesale Corp1.76%
  • Applied Materials Inc1.63%

Weight gaps

All 43 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in NBFR and QTR, widest gap first
HoldingMore in NBFRMore in QTR
Walmart IncWMTNBFR +2.62 points
Microsoft CorpMSFTNBFR +1.94 points
Workday IncWDAYNBFR +1.86 points
Apple IncAAPLNBFR +1.53 points
Amgen IncAMGNNBFR +1.49 points
Xcel Energy IncXELNBFR +1.49 points
Kla CorpKLACNBFR +1.33 points
Paychex IncPAYXNBFR +1.28 points

All 55 NBFR holdings⁠All 103 QTR holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NBFR vs QTR Cost

Overpaying NBFR vs QTR

$10,015

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NBFR 0.79%

    $15,174

  • QTR 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NBFR 0.79%
  • QTR 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530NBFR $15,174QTR $5,159

Year by year

YearNBFRQTROverpaying
10$1,405$455$950
20$5,331$1,769$3,562
30$15,174$5,159$10,015

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%NBFR
  • 0.25%QTR, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

QTR cheapest of 12 funds

NBFR 6th cheapest of 12 funds

NBFR vs QTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
NBFR No data
QTR 17.33%
Payout (12M)
NBFR No data
QTR $5.67
Last payment
NBFR $0.006
QTR $0.04
Ex-dividend
NBFR Mar 31, 2026
QTR Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
NBFR Apr 1, 2026
QTR Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
NBFR Irregular
QTR Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

NBFRIrregular · 1 paymentAll NBFR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Mar 31, 2026 $0.006. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD
QTRTwice a year · 10 paymentsAll QTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.49; Jun 29, 2022 $0.03; Dec 29, 2022 $0.04; Jun 29, 2023 $0.03; Dec 28, 2023 $0.11; Jun 27, 2024 $0.06; Dec 30, 2024 $0.10; Jun 27, 2025 $0.08; Dec 30, 2025 $5.63; Jun 29, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD

NBFR vs QTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NBFR No dataQTR 16.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NBFR No dataQTR 0.91
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NBFR No dataQTR −31.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NBFR 0.56QTR 1.16

NBFR and QTR in the news

Popular comparisons

  • NBFRDvsPQAPB

    Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTRBvsPQAPB

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NBFRDvsPQJAB

    Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTRBvsPQJAB

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NBFRDvsPQOCB

    Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTRBvsPQOCB

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.