Skip to content

NBFR vs PQAP

Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF

NBFRDNYSE Arca

PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

PQAPBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

PQAP −0.29pt a year

NBFR0.79%PQAP0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

PQAP 1.2×the volume

NBFR5.17KPQAP6.17K

NBFR vs PQAP Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−1.4%NBFR+2.4%PQAP

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. NBFR −1.4%. PQAP +2.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%1%4%5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
NBFR 0.79%
PQAP 0.50%, better
Fund size
NBFR $21M
PQAP $32M
1Y total return
NBFR No data
PQAP +15.5%
Holdings
NBFR 49
PQAP 4
Avg volume (30D)
NBFR 5.17K sh
PQAP 6.17K sh, better
NAV per share
NBFR $25.69
PQAP $32.96
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NBFR: Cost 46, Risk 15, Mission not scored, Tradability 12, Holdings 76, Durability 10. PQAP: Cost 76, Risk 93, Mission not scored, Tradability 29, Holdings not scored, Durability 49.
Pillar letters and Scores for NBFR, PQAP, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNBFRPQAP
Cost30% weightC46A76Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF15A93Higher
Tradability15% weightF12D29Higher
Holdings10% weightA76Not scored
Durability5% weightF10C49Higher

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NBFR and PQAP are both graded against the same 12 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 12 funds
See all 12 ›

PQAP ranks 1st and NBFR 12th of 12 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPQAPPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - AprilScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPQJAPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - JanuaryScore 62
  3. Rank 11CQSPTFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - SeptemberScore 41
  4. Rank 12DNBFRInnovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETFScore 34

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NBFRDInnovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF

PQAPBPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

In short

NBFR Innovator's Nasdaq-100 buffer, minus the calendar. NBFR spreads its options across a laddered set of periods with a manager steering them, aiming to absorb roughly the first 10% to 14% of index losses.

PQAP A one-year cushion on the Nasdaq-100, with a bit more padding than the category norm: PQAP absorbs the first 12% of a QQQ drop over each period starting April 1, and charges 0.50% to do it.

Stated mandate

NBFR The Fund seeks capital appreciation through Nasdaq-100 equity exposure while using an actively managed, laddered options strategy to reduce volatility and protect approximately 10% to 14% of reference-asset losses.

PQAP The Fund seeks to match QQQ’s price return up to a predetermined cap while buffering the first 12% of QQQ losses over a one-year target outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • NBFR Laddered by design: protection is staggered across overlapping option periods instead of hinging on one annual reset date, so entry timing matters less.
  • Actively managed, not rules-on-rails: a manager runs the option ladder with a stated goal of damping volatility on Nasdaq-100 exposure.
  • Fee sits at the middle of its Nasdaq-100 buffer peer group at 0.79%, the same sticker as Innovator's date-locked sibling QBUF.
  • PQAP The buffer runs 12 percentage points deep, versus the 10% cushion on the Innovator Nasdaq-100 buffer fund (QBUF) sitting in the same peer group.pgim.com
  • 0.50% a year undercuts the typical Nasdaq-100 buffer fund, including QBUF at 0.79%. In a strategy where the option budget sets your cap, fee drag matters.
  • April is one of four start months PGIM runs on this same 12% QQQ recipe (January, April, July, October), so entry points can be staggered instead of bunched.pgim.com
  • Mechanically clean build: FLEX options on QQQ itself, a stated one-year outcome period, and one of the stronger risk profiles among Nasdaq-100 buffer funds.

Worth knowing

  • NBFR Cheaper routes to Nasdaq-100 buffering exist in the same cohort: PGIM's dated buffer funds charge 0.50% and Global X's QTR 0.25%.
  • Launched in 2026, so the record is short, and it trades lightly next to the category's household names, which can mean wider spreads.
  • The buffer is a slice, not a floor: roughly 10% to 14% of index declines. Losses past that pass through to shareholders.
  • PQAP The upside cap is reset for each period and is unknown until it starts. Above it, QQQ's gains keep going without you.pgim.com
  • The 12% buffer is measured before fees and expenses and applies to holders across a full period. Buy mid-period and your own cushion and cap differ from the headline terms.pgim.com
  • Small and lightly traded next to the buffer giants, so spreads can be wider. It also launched in late 2024, giving it a short record.

Full NBFR profile⁠

Full PQAP profile⁠

NBFR vs PQAP Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NBFR vs PQAP Cost

Overpaying NBFR vs PQAP

$5,195

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NBFR 0.79%

    $15,174

  • PQAP 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NBFR 0.79%
  • PQAP 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530NBFR $15,174PQAP $9,979

Year by year

YearNBFRPQAPOverpaying
10$1,405$900$505
20$5,331$3,460$1,871
30$15,174$9,979$5,195

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%NBFR
  • 0.50%PQAP, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PQAP 2nd cheapest of 12 funds

NBFR 6th cheapest of 12 funds

NBFR vs PQAP Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Last payment
NBFR $0.006
PQAP $0.0049
Ex-dividend
NBFR Mar 31, 2026
PQAP Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
NBFR Apr 1, 2026
PQAP Jan 2, 2026
Frequency
NBFR Irregular
PQAP Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

NBFRIrregular · 1 paymentAll NBFR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Mar 31, 2026 $0.006. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.0052026YTD
PQAPIrregular · 1 paymentAll PQAP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.0049. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.0052026YTD

NBFR vs PQAP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NBFR No dataPQAP 6.7%since Feb 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NBFR No dataPQAP 1.59since Feb 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NBFR No dataPQAP −10.8%since Jan 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NBFR 0.56PQAP 0.43

Popular comparisons

  • NBFRDvsPQJAB

    Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PQAPBvsPQJAB

    PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NBFRDvsQTRB

    Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF · Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PQAPBvsQTRB

    PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April · Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NBFRDvsPQOCB

    Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PQAPBvsPQOCB

    PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.