TSLS ranks 3rd and NBIZ 39th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
NBIZ vs TSLS
TSLS −0.54pt a year
1.49%0.95%
NBIZ 5.2×the volume
2.13M410K
NBIZ vs TSLS Performance
−50.2%−23.8%
- NBIZ 1.49%
- TSLS 0.95%, better
- NBIZ $30M
- TSLS $39M
- NBIZ
- TSLS +1.0%
- NBIZ
- TSLS 3.11%
- NBIZ 3
- TSLS 4
- NBIZ 2.13M sh, better
- TSLS 410K sh
- NBIZ $37.95
- TSLS $50.04
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NBIZ | TSLS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D25 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A87 | |
| Risk | F21 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | C50Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C52 | A82Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. NBIZ and TSLS are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NBIZD
TSLSA
In short
NBIZ A one-ticker short on Nebius. NBIZ aims to deliver two times the inverse of NBIS's move over a single trading day, then resets. A trader's instrument in an ETF wrapper, not a position you set and forget.
TSLS The plain short on Tesla: TSLS aims for -1x the stock's daily move, with no leverage stacked on top. Among the small group of Tesla bear funds, it is the cheapest, and the one that dials risk down rather than up.
Stated mandate
NBIZ The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to two times the inverse of NBIS’s performance, before fees and expenses. The objective applies only to a single trading day.
TSLS The Fund seeks daily inverse investment results by maintaining short exposure to TSLA of approximately -100% of its net assets and generally rebalancing that exposure each trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NBIZ vs TSLS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NBIZ vs TSLS Cost
Overpaying NBIZ vs TSLS
$8,272
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NBIZ 1.49%
$26,141
TSLS 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NBIZ | TSLS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,574 | $1,678 | $896 |
| 20 | $9,464 | $6,322 | $3,142 |
| 30 | $26,141 | $17,869 | $8,272 |
- 1.49%NBIZ
- 0.95%TSLS, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSLS 2nd cheapest of 43 funds
NBIZ 31st cheapest of 43 funds
NBIZ vs TSLS Dividends
- NBIZ
- TSLS 3.11%
- NBIZ None
- TSLS $1.57
- NBIZ
- TSLS $0.40
- NBIZ
- TSLS Sep 22, 2026
- NBIZ
- TSLS Sep 29, 2026
- NBIZ
- TSLS Quarterly
Distribution history
NBIZ vs TSLS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NBIZ TSLS 51.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- NBIZ TSLS −0.76
- Worst fall
- NBIZ TSLS −90.7%
- Market sensitivity
- NBIZ −1.73TSLS −1.41
Popular comparisons
- 1.49% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.