NCIQ ranks 2nd and TXBC 8th of 10 funds in the Spot Crypto Basket Category.
NCIQ vs TXBC
0.0%by weight
NCIQ −1.09pt a year
0.25%1.34%
NCIQ 27.2×the volume
48.7K1.79K
NCIQ vs TXBC Performance
−15.9%−23.6%
- NCIQ 0.25%, better
- TXBC 1.34%
- NCIQ $447M
- TXBC $1M
- NCIQ −34.5%
- TXBC
- NCIQ 10
- TXBC 11
- NCIQ 48.7K sh, better
- TXBC 1.79K sh
- NCIQ $19.19
- TXBC $15.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NCIQ | TXBC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A75Higher | F14 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | D35Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | C54Higher | F17 |
| Holdings | B64 | |
| Durability | B68Higher | C40 |
Rank among Spot Crypto Basket funds
Same Category. NCIQ and TXBC are both graded against the same 10 Spot Crypto Basket funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NCIQA
TXBCC
In short
NCIQ A passive basket of the digital assets in a Nasdaq index, run at 0.25% a year while the typical multi-coin crypto fund charges more than double that. It tracks the index and makes no attempt to beat it.
TXBC Most crypto baskets are really a bitcoin fund with sprinkles. TXBC removes bitcoin outright and tracks FTSE's next 10 coins by market cap, in a 1940 Act ETF wrapper crypto rarely gets. Fee: 1.34%, no waiver.
Stated mandate
NCIQ The Trust seeks to match the daily price changes of its reference index, after expenses and liabilities, by investing in the index's digital-asset constituents. It uses a passive strategy and does not seek to outperform the index.
TXBC The Fund seeks to track the price performance of the FTSE Crypto 10 ex Bitcoin Select Index before fees and expenses. It uses a passive indexing strategy and does not seek to outperform the Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NCIQ vs TXBC Holdings
How NCIQ and TXBC differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of NCIQ and 0.0% of TXBC.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for NCIQ and TXBC.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for NCIQ.
Concentration
- NCIQ100.0%
- TXBC99.4%
- NCIQ8
- TXBC11
Asset class
- NCIQ
- Alternatives
- TXBC
- Alternatives
Holdings
- Only in NCIQ8
- In both0
- Only in TXBC11
Only in NCIQ
8 securities, 99.7% of NCIQ by weight
- Bitcoin75.10%
- Ethereum11.14%
- Ripple4.86%
- Hyperliquid3.78%
- Solana3.62%
- Cardano0.45%
- Chainlink0.43%
- Stellar0.30%
Only in TXBC
11 securities, 100% of TXBC by weight
- 21Shares Ethereum Staking ETF48.45%
- 21Shares Binance BNB ETP16.84%
- 21shares XRP ETF13.68%
- 21Shares Solana Staking ETF9.48%
- 21shares Hyperliquid Staking ETF3.86%
- 21Shares Dogecoin ETF2.09%
- 21Shares Chainlink ETP1.45%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20371.29%
- 21Shares Cardano ETP1.25%
- 21Shares Stellar ETP1.01%
- 21shares Canton Network ETP0.66%
Weight gaps
NCIQ and TXBC share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NCIQ vs TXBC Cost
Overpaying TXBC vs NCIQ
$18,806
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NCIQ 0.25%
$5,159
TXBC 1.34%
$23,965
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NCIQ | TXBC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $2,329 | $1,874 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $8,621 | $6,852 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $23,965 | $18,806 |
- 0.25%NCIQ, cheaper
- 1.34%TXBC
- Middle half of Spot Crypto Basket funds
- Median 0.67%
NCIQ 3rd cheapest of 10 funds
TXBC 9th cheapest of 10 funds
NCIQ vs TXBC Dividends
- NCIQ None
- TXBC None
Distribution history
NCIQ vs TXBC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NCIQ 43.2%TXBC
- Return per unit of risk
- NCIQ −0.06TXBC
- Worst fall
- NCIQ −57.0%TXBC
- Market sensitivity
- NCIQ 1.09TXBC 0.56
NCIQ and TXBC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.34% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.34% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.34% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
