TSLS ranks 3rd and NFXS 28th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
NFXS vs TSLS
TSLS −0.08pt a year
1.03%0.95%
TSLS 18.2×the volume
22.5K410K
NFXS vs TSLS Performance
+69.4%+1.0%
- NFXS 1.03%
- TSLS 0.95%, better
- NFXS $3M
- TSLS $39M
- NFXS +69.4%, better
- TSLS +1.0%
- NFXS 2.16%
- TSLS 3.11%, better
- NFXS 4
- TSLS 4
- NFXS 22.5K sh
- TSLS 410K sh, better
- NFXS $24.19
- TSLS $50.04
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NFXS | TSLS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B69 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A97Higher | A87 |
| Risk | A96Higher | A75 |
| Tradability | D25 | C45Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C51 | A82Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. NFXS and TSLS are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NFXSC
TSLSA
In short
NFXS Shorting Netflix without a margin account or a borrow: NFXS aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of NFLX's one-day move. Direxion runs the bull side of this pair at 2x and the bear side at 1x, so it's a straight short, not an amplified one.
TSLS The plain short on Tesla: TSLS aims for -1x the stock's daily move, with no leverage stacked on top. Among the small group of Tesla bear funds, it is the cheapest, and the one that dials risk down rather than up.
Stated mandate
NFXS The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse of Netflix common shares' performance, before fees and expenses.
TSLS The Fund seeks daily inverse investment results by maintaining short exposure to TSLA of approximately -100% of its net assets and generally rebalancing that exposure each trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NFXS vs TSLS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NFXS vs TSLS Cost
Overpaying NFXS vs TSLS
$1,304
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NFXS 1.03%
$19,173
TSLS 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NFXS | TSLS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,814 | $1,678 | $136 |
| 20 | $6,807 | $6,322 | $485 |
| 30 | $19,173 | $17,869 | $1,304 |
- 1.03%NFXS
- 0.95%TSLS, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSLS 2nd cheapest of 43 funds
NFXS 18th cheapest of 43 funds
NFXS vs TSLS Dividends
- NFXS 2.16%
- TSLS 3.11%, better
- NFXS $0.52
- TSLS $1.57
- NFXS $0.13
- TSLS $0.40
- NFXS Sep 22, 2026
- TSLS Sep 22, 2026
- NFXS Sep 29, 2026
- TSLS Sep 29, 2026
- NFXS Quarterly
- TSLS Quarterly
Distribution history
NFXS vs TSLS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NFXS 37.5%TSLS 51.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- NFXS 0.21TSLS −0.76
- Worst fall
- NFXS −50.4%TSLS −90.7%
- Market sensitivity
- NFXS −0.29TSLS −1.41
Popular comparisons
- 1.03% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.