Skip to content
etf.net

NJUL vs QJL

Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July

NJULCCboe

Corgi Growth & Technology 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series

QJLCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

QJL −0.49pt a year

NJUL0.79%QJL0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

NJUL 19.7×the volume

NJUL21.4KQJL1.08K

NJUL vs QJL Performance

Aug 5, 2026 – Nov 5, 2026

−4.9%NJUL−5.2%QJL

Aug 5, 2026 to Nov 5, 2026. NJUL −4.9%. QJL −5.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2%0%2%4%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
NJUL 0.79%
QJL 0.30%, better
Fund size
NJUL $269M
QJL $1M
1Y total return
NJUL +1.5%
QJL No data
Holdings
NJUL 3
QJL 4
Avg volume (30D)
NJUL 21.4K sh, better
QJL 1.08K sh
NAV per share
NJUL $75.88
QJL $24.74
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NJUL: Cost 39, Risk 40, Mission not scored, Tradability 82, Holdings not scored, Durability 87. QJL: Cost 87, Risk 24, Mission not scored, Tradability 14, Holdings not scored, Durability 9.
Pillar letters and Scores for NJUL, QJL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNJULQJL
Cost30% weightD39A87Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC40HigherF24
Tradability15% weightA82HigherF14
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA87HigherF9

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NJUL and QJL are both graded against the same 15 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 15 funds
See all 15 ›

NJUL ranks 4th and QJL 8th of 15 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BQBQFAllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETFScore 56
  2. Rank 2CNOCTInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETFScore 55
  3. Rank 3CNJANInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETFScore 54
  4. Rank 4CNJULInnovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - JulyScore 53
  5. Rank 5CNAPRInnovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - AprilScore 52
  6. Rank 7CQCJAFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - JanuaryScore 42
  7. Rank 8CQJLCorgi Growth & Technology 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40
  8. Rank 8CQJNCorgi Growth & Technology 10% Structured Buffer ETF - June SeriesScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NJULCInnovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July

QJLCCorgi Growth & Technology 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series

In short

NJUL Nasdaq-100 exposure with a seatbelt. NJUL absorbs the first 15% of QQQ's losses over a one-year outcome period that resets each July, and in exchange accepts a ceiling on the upside set the day the period begins.

QJL No data

Stated mandate

NJUL The fund seeks to track the return of the Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ), subject to a predetermined cap, while protecting investors from the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.

QJL No data

Why people hold it

  • NJUL The contract is written down, not implied: a 15-point cushion against QQQ's decline over the outcome period, with the trade-off stated in the prospectus.
  • The clock resets every July 1. Investors who start with a fresh period know the buffer and the cap before they commit, rather than guessing at the risk.
  • A plain 1940 Act ETF, not a bank-issued structured note, so the defined outcome doesn't ride on a single issuer's credit.
  • Live since 2020, with siblings NJAN and NAPR running the same Nasdaq-100 buffer recipe at the same 0.79% on different reset dates.

QJL No data

Worth knowing

  • NJUL The ceiling is real. The cap is fixed when each period starts, so a runaway Nasdaq year leaves gains on the table.
  • Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever buffer and cap are left, not the headline 15%. Full terms belong to holders who own from the reset date.
  • At 0.79% it matches the typical Nasdaq-100 buffer fund, but sits above PBQQ at 0.50% and the Calamos series at 0.69%, and it isn't among the group's busiest tickers.

QJL No data

Full NJUL profile⁠

Full QJL profile⁠

NJUL vs QJL Holdings

How NJUL and QJL differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classStocks100%
  • Countryby domicile99.99%
  • Sector10 Sectors99.99%

Sector

Sector weights in NJUL and QJL, widest gap first
SectorMore in NJULMore in QJLGap
TechnologySame weight
CommunicationSame weight
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
Consumer StaplesSame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
Health CareSame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
MaterialsSame weight
EnergySame weight
FinancialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in NJUL and QJL, widest gap first
CountryMore in NJULMore in QJLGap
United StatesSame weight
CanadaSame weight
NetherlandsSame weight
BrazilSame weight
ChinaSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • NJUL103.9%
  • QJL104.5%

Securities held

  • NJUL3
  • QJL3

Asset class

NJUL
Stocks
QJL
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in NJUL3
  • In both0
  • Only in QJL3

Only in NJUL

3 securities, 100% of NJUL by weight

  • Qqq 06/30/2027 7.36 C94.96%
  • Qqq 06/30/2027 736.4 P8.62%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.33%

Only in QJL

3 securities, 100% of QJL by weight

  • Qqq 06/30/2027 145.05 C74.15%
  • United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.25% 06/30/202719.62%
  • Qqq 06/30/2027 725.23 P7.62%

Weight gaps

NJUL and QJL share no securities.

All 6 NJUL holdings⁠All QJL holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NJUL vs QJL Cost

Overpaying NJUL vs QJL

$9,025

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NJUL 0.79%

    $15,174

  • QJL 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NJUL 0.79%
  • QJL 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530NJUL $15,174QJL $6,149

Year by year

YearNJULQJLOverpaying
10$1,405$545$860
20$5,331$2,113$3,218
30$15,174$6,149$9,025

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%NJUL
  • 0.30%QJL, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

QJL cheapest of 15 funds

NJUL 8th cheapest of 15 funds

NJUL vs QJL Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026
Payout (12M)
NJUL None
QJL None

Distribution history

NJULAll NJUL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QJLAll QJL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

NJUL vs QJL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NJUL 8.8%QJL No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NJUL 1.09QJL No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NJUL −14.4%QJL No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NJUL 0.57QJL 1.34

Popular comparisons

  • NJULCvsQBQFB

    Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July · AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QJLCvsQBQFB

    Corgi Growth & Technology 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NJULCvsNOCTC

    Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QJLCvsNOCTC

    Corgi Growth & Technology 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NJULCvsNJANC

    Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QJLCvsNJANC

    Corgi Growth & Technology 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.