QLD ranks 1st and NUGT 78th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
NUGT vs QLD
QLD −0.24pt a year
1.13%0.89%
QLD 6.2×the volume
672K4.15M
QLD +40.2pt
−8.3%+31.9%
NUGT vs QLD Performance
+138.7%+97.9%
- NUGT 1.13%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- NUGT $851M
- QLD $13.3B
- NUGT −15.6%
- QLD +10.7%, better
- NUGT 1.00%, better
- QLD 0.15%
- NUGT 10
- QLD 113
- NUGT 672K sh
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- NUGT $124.24
- QLD $82.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NUGT | QLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F15 | A72Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | D37 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | B58 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | A72 | |
| Durability | A75 | A81Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. NUGT and QLD are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NUGTD
QLDA
In short
NUGT Gold miners with the volume turned up. NUGT aims for 200% of the daily move of the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, a veteran way to press a view on mining shares without margin or an options account.
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
Stated mandate
NUGT The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 200% of the performance of the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index.
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NUGT vs QLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NUGT vs QLD Cost
Overpaying NUGT vs QLD
$3,892
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NUGT 1.13%
$20,764
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NUGT | QLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,981 | $1,576 | $405 |
| 20 | $7,403 | $5,953 | $1,450 |
| 30 | $20,764 | $16,872 | $3,892 |
- 1.13%NUGT
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
NUGT 84th cheapest of 95 funds
NUGT vs QLD Dividends
- NUGT 1.00%, better
- QLD 0.15%
- NUGT $1.11
- QLD $0.12
- NUGT $0.40
- QLD $0.03
- NUGT Sep 22, 2026
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- NUGT Sep 29, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- NUGT Quarterly
- QLD Quarterly
Distribution history
NUGT vs QLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- NUGT
- QLD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NUGT 85.7%QLD 36.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- NUGT 0.88QLD 1.04, better
- Worst fall
- NUGT −73.7%QLD −63.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- NUGT 0.61QLD 2.46
NUGT and QLD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.13% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.13% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.13% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
