Skip to content

NVBT vs SIXJ

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Nov ETF

NVBTCCboe

AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

SIXJBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

NVBT0.74%SIXJ0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

SIXJ 6.9×the volume

NVBT2.2KSIXJ15.1K

3Y return · a year

SIXJ +0.5pt

NVBT+14.4%SIXJ+14.9%

NVBT vs SIXJ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+10.1%NVBT+10.5%SIXJ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. NVBT +10.1%. SIXJ +10.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
NVBT 0.74%
SIXJ 0.74%
Fund size
NVBT $29M
SIXJ $149M
1Y total return
NVBT +10.1%
SIXJ +10.5%, better
Holdings
NVBT 2
SIXJ 3
Avg volume (30D)
NVBT 2.2K sh
SIXJ 15.1K sh, better
NAV per share
NVBT $40.99
SIXJ $37.56
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NVBT: Cost 68, Risk 49, Mission 82, Tradability 33, Holdings 49, Durability 28. SIXJ: Cost 68, Risk 67, Mission not scored, Tradability 70, Holdings 53, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for NVBT, SIXJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNVBTSIXJ
Cost30% weightB68B68
Mission25% weightA82Not scored
Risk15% weightC49B67Higher
Tradability15% weightD33A70Higher
Holdings10% weightC49C53Higher
Durability5% weightD28B57Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NVBT and SIXJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

SIXJ ranks 4th and NVBT 34th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 3BTENJiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BSIXJAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETFScore 65
  5. Rank 5BBUFMAB Moderate Buffer ETFScore 64
  6. Rank 34CBMARInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 52
  7. Rank 34CNVBTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Nov ETFScore 52
  8. Rank 37CBAUGInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 51

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NVBTCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Nov ETF

SIXJBAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

In short

NVBT A one-year hedge that starts its clock on November 1. NVBT absorbs the first 10% of an S&P 500 price decline over each outcome period, and in exchange your upside stops at a cap reset every November.

SIXJ Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month cycle. SIXJ runs a six-month one, resetting each January and July: it tracks SPY's share-price move, absorbs the first 10% of losses, and takes a fresh upside cap twice a year.

Stated mandate

NVBT The actively managed ETF is designed to provide S&P 500-linked returns over a defined Outcome Period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of index losses.

SIXJ The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over a six-month outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses.

Why people hold it

  • NVBT The deal is written down before you take it: the first 10% of S&P 500 price losses in each outcome period are absorbed by the fund's options, with a cap set the same day.
  • At 0.74%, it runs below the median fee for shallow-buffer S&P 500 funds, and matches AllianzIM's own November-, January- and April-start siblings JANT and APRT.
  • AllianzIM runs the calendar, not just one month: twelve-month starts plus six-month Buffer10 pairs like SIXZ, so November is one rung on a ladder rather than a lone bet.
  • Actively managed and self-rolling since its 2022 launch: the options book is rebuilt each November instead of leaving you to reset a collar yourself.
  • SIXJ The 10% buffer and the cap reset every January 1 and July 1, so terms refresh twice a year instead of on the usual annual clock.
  • 0.74% expense ratio, on the lean side for a defined-outcome fund and below the typical fee among its shallow-buffer peers.
  • The reference asset is SPY itself, the original S&P 500 ETF, so the payoff is keyed to a plain vanilla benchmark rather than a bespoke index.
  • Rates among the stronger implementations in a crowded shallow-buffer field, alongside AllianzIM's other six-month siblings like SIXZ and SIXD.

Worth knowing

  • NVBT The reference is the S&P 500 Price Index, so dividends sit outside the buffer-and-cap math entirely. The fund has paid no distributions.
  • Buffer and cap describe a full outcome period, November 1 to October 31. Buy midstream and your own protection and headroom differ from the headline terms.
  • One of the smaller, more thinly traded funds in a crowded buffer field, so spreads can run wider than at the giants. Limit orders do more work here.
  • SIXJ Buffer and cap are designed to work over the full six-month period. Buy mid-period and you get whatever cushion and upside room remain at that moment.
  • It tracks SPY's share-price return, so dividends aren't passed through and the fund isn't structured to pay income.
  • Volume is light next to the largest buffer funds, so bid-ask spreads can run wider, especially in fast-moving markets.

Full NVBT profile⁠

Full SIXJ profile⁠

NVBT vs SIXJ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NVBT vs SIXJ Cost

Same expense ratio

$14,307

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NVBT 0.74%

    $14,307

  • SIXJ 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NVBT 0.74%
  • SIXJ 0.74%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530NVBT $14,307SIXJ $14,307

Year by year

YearNVBTSIXJ
10$1,319$1,319
20$5,015$5,015
30$14,307$14,307

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%NVBT
  • 0.74%SIXJ
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

NVBT 17th cheapest of 77 funds

SIXJ 17th cheapest of 77 funds

NVBT vs SIXJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
NVBT None
SIXJ None

Distribution history

NVBTAll NVBT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SIXJAll SIXJ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

NVBT vs SIXJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NVBT 7.5%SIXJ 5.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NVBT 1.25SIXJ 1.67, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NVBT −12.9%since Nov 2022SIXJ −14.1%since Jan 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NVBT 0.65SIXJ 0.46

NVBT and SIXJ in the news

Popular comparisons

  • NVBTCvsZALTA

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Nov ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsZALTA

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NVBTCvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Nov ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NVBTCvsTENJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Nov ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsTENJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.