SGOL ranks 3rd and OUNZ 7th of 10 funds in the Physical Gold Category.
OUNZ vs SGOL
SGOL −0.08pt a year
0.25%0.17%
SGOL 4.0×the volume
595K2.39M
SGOL +0.1pt
+11.4%+11.5%
OUNZ vs SGOL Performance
+115.3%+116.0%
- OUNZ 0.25%
- SGOL 0.17%, better
- OUNZ $2.51B
- SGOL $6.7B
- OUNZ −3.1%
- SGOL −3.1%
- OUNZ 1
- SGOL 1
- OUNZ 595K sh
- SGOL 2.39M sh, better
- OUNZ $37.29
- SGOL $37.24
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | OUNZ | SGOL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | B59Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C49 | C49 |
| Tradability | B61 | B63Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B60 | B62Higher |
Rank among Physical Gold funds
Same Category. OUNZ and SGOL are both graded against the same 10 Physical Gold funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
OUNZB
SGOLB
In short
OUNZ Most gold funds hand you a claim on metal you will never touch. OUNZ, running since 2014, writes a different option into its prospectus: shareholders can exchange shares for physical gold bullion. Same metal exposure, with a door to the real thing.
SGOL A 2009-vintage trust that owns actual gold bars and does exactly one job: track bullion's price after a 0.17% fee. Middle of the pack on cost, front of the pack on doing what the prospectus says.
Stated mandate
OUNZ The fund provides exposure to gold through exchange-traded shares and allows investors the option to receive physical gold bullion in exchange for shares.
SGOL The Trust seeks to track the price of physical gold bullion, after deducting its expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
OUNZ vs SGOL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
OUNZ vs SGOL Cost
Overpaying OUNZ vs SGOL
$1,613
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
OUNZ 0.25%
$5,159
SGOL 0.17%
$3,546
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | OUNZ | SGOL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $310 | $145 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $1,211 | $558 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $3,546 | $1,613 |
- 0.25%OUNZ
- 0.17%SGOL, cheaper
- Middle half of Physical Gold funds
- Median 0.17%
SGOL 4th cheapest of 10 funds
OUNZ 8th cheapest of 10 funds
OUNZ vs SGOL Dividends
- OUNZ None
- SGOL None
Distribution history
OUNZ vs SGOL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- OUNZ
- SGOL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- OUNZ 19.4%SGOL 19.4%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- OUNZ 1.02SGOL 1.02Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- OUNZ −28.1%SGOL −28.1%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- OUNZ 0.34SGOL 0.40
OUNZ and SGOL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



