PBTP ranks 5th and STPZ 23rd of 40 funds in the TIPS Category.
PBTP vs STPZ
PBTP −0.13pt a year
0.07%0.20%
PBTP 1.1×the volume
83.7K76.2K
PBTP +0.4pt
+2.9%+2.5%
PBTP vs STPZ Performance
+15.6%+13.0%
- PBTP 0.07%, better
- STPZ 0.20%
- PBTP $248M
- STPZ $578M
- PBTP +2.4%, better
- STPZ +1.8%
- PBTP 4.00%
- STPZ 5.52%, better
- PBTP 27
- STPZ 25
- PBTP 83.7K sh, better
- STPZ 76.2K sh
- PBTP $25.80
- STPZ $52.70
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PBTP | STPZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | F21 |
| Mission | B57 | B62Higher |
| Risk | B68Higher | B66 |
| Tradability | B58 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | A81Higher | B66 |
| Durability | B64 | A74Higher |
Rank among TIPS funds
Same Category. PBTP and STPZ are both graded against the same 40 TIPS funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PBTPA
STPZC
In short
PBTP Inflation-linked Treasuries with the long end cut off: PBTP holds only TIPS maturing inside five years, keeping the CPI adjustment while dialing down interest-rate swings.
STPZ Inflation protection on a short leash. STPZ indexes only TIPS maturing in one to five years, pairing CPI-linked principal with less rate sensitivity than long-dated linkers. It has worked this niche since 2009, at a fee above the category norm.
Stated mandate
PBTP The fund provides exposure to US Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities with remaining maturities from one month to less than five years.
STPZ The Fund seeks total return that closely tracks its specified U.S. inflation-linked Treasury index before fees and expenses. It uses indexing and representative sampling rather than trying to outperform the index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PBTP vs STPZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PBTP vs STPZ Cost
Overpaying STPZ vs PBTP
$2,675
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PBTP 0.07%
$1,480
STPZ 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PBTP | STPZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $128 | $365 | $237 |
| 20 | $503 | $1,421 | $918 |
| 30 | $1,480 | $4,155 | $2,675 |
- 0.07%PBTP, cheaper
- 0.20%STPZ
- Middle half of TIPS funds
- Median 0.10%
PBTP 5th cheapest of 40 funds
STPZ 31st cheapest of 40 funds
PBTP vs STPZ Dividends
- PBTP 4.00%
- STPZ 5.52%, better
- PBTP $1.03
- STPZ $2.88
- PBTP $0.02
- STPZ $0.44
- PBTP Sep 21, 2026
- STPZ Nov 2, 2026
- PBTP Sep 25, 2026
- STPZ Pays Nov 4, 2026
- PBTP Quarterly
- STPZ Quarterly
Distribution history
PBTP vs STPZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PBTP
- STPZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PBTP 1.9%, betterSTPZ 2.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- PBTP 0.28, betterSTPZ 0.18
- Worst fall
- PBTP −5.5%, betterSTPZ −6.7%
- Market sensitivity
- PBTP 0.20STPZ 0.26
Popular comparisons
- 0.07% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.