SCHP ranks 1st and STPZ 23rd of 40 funds in the TIPS Category.
SCHP vs STPZ
SCHP −0.17pt a year
0.03%0.20%
SCHP 73.9×the volume
5.63M76.2K
STPZ +0.4pt
+2.4%+2.8%
SCHP vs STPZ Performance
+1.2%+13.3%
- SCHP 0.03%, better
- STPZ 0.20%
- SCHP $17.5B
- STPZ $530M
- SCHP +0.1%
- STPZ +2.0%, better
- SCHP 4.89%, better
- STPZ 4.63%
- SCHP 49
- STPZ 25
- SCHP 5.63M sh, better
- STPZ 76.2K sh
- SCHP $25.74
- STPZ $52.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCHP | STPZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | F21 |
| Mission | A100Higher | B61 |
| Risk | D35 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | A91Higher | A77 |
| Holdings | A87Higher | B67 |
| Durability | A82Higher | A74 |
Rank among TIPS funds
Same Category. SCHP and STPZ are both graded against the same 40 TIPS funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCHPA
STPZC
In short
SCHP Inflation insurance in the plainest wrapper available: SCHP owns the full maturity range of Treasury inflation-protected bonds and tracks its Bloomberg index for three basis points a year.
STPZ Inflation protection on a short leash. STPZ indexes only TIPS maturing in one to five years, pairing CPI-linked principal with less rate sensitivity than long-dated linkers. It has worked this niche since 2009, at a fee above the category norm.
Stated mandate
SCHP The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of an index composed of inflation-protected U.S. Treasury securities.
STPZ The Fund seeks total return that closely tracks its specified U.S. inflation-linked Treasury index before fees and expenses. It uses indexing and representative sampling rather than trying to outperform the index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCHP vs STPZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCHP vs STPZ Cost
Overpaying STPZ vs SCHP
$3,517
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCHP 0.03%
$638
STPZ 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCHP | STPZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $365 | $310 |
| 20 | $216 | $1,421 | $1,205 |
| 30 | $638 | $4,155 | $3,517 |
- 0.03%SCHP, cheaper
- 0.20%STPZ
- Middle half of TIPS funds
- Median 0.10%
SCHP cheapest of 40 funds
STPZ 31st cheapest of 40 funds
SCHP vs STPZ Dividends
- SCHP 4.89%, better
- STPZ 4.63%
- SCHP $1.26
- STPZ $2.44
- SCHP $0.06
- STPZ $0.39
- SCHP Oct 1, 2026
- STPZ Aug 3, 2026
- SCHP Oct 7, 2026
- STPZ Aug 5, 2026
- SCHP Monthly
- STPZ Monthly
Distribution history
SCHP vs STPZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SCHP
- STPZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCHP 4.5%STPZ 2.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SCHP 0.09STPZ 0.18, better
- Worst fall
- SCHP −14.3%STPZ −6.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- SCHP 0.70STPZ 0.26
SCHP and STPZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

