PEPS ranks 21st and XDTE 37th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
PEPS vs XDTE
PEPS −0.87pt a year
0.10%0.97%
XDTE 371.0×the volume
417155K
PEPS vs XDTE Performance
+13.2%+13.0%
- PEPS 0.10%, better
- XDTE 0.97%
- PEPS $28M
- XDTE $307M
- PEPS +13.2%, better
- XDTE +13.0%
- PEPS 0.98%
- XDTE 29.86%, better
- PEPS 192
- XDTE 4
- PEPS 417 sh
- XDTE 155K sh, better
- PEPS $31.53
- XDTE $36.46
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PEPS | XDTE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F8 |
| Mission | A75 | |
| Risk | D25 | D29Higher |
| Tradability | D33 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | A71Higher | C41 |
| Durability | D39 | B59Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. PEPS and XDTE are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PEPSB
XDTEC
In short
PEPS Active management at index-fund pricing. PEPS holds a U.S. large-cap base, then writes S&P 500 calls against offsetting long exposure: a beta-neutral overlay built to add return rather than swap upside for income.
XDTE The original 0DTE covered call fund. It sells same-day S&P 500 calls each morning and lets them expire at the close, capping the trading session while leaving the overnight stretch uncapped. Pays weekly.
Stated mandate
PEPS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed, using a U.S. large-cap equity base and beta-neutral call overwriting on the S&P 500 with offsetting long exposure to seek incremental total return.
XDTE The Fund's primary objective is current income and its secondary objective is capital appreciation. It uses a synthetic covered-call strategy to provide weekly income while maintaining exposure to the S&P 500 Index's price return.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PEPS vs XDTE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PEPS vs XDTE Cost
Overpaying XDTE vs PEPS
$16,092
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PEPS 0.10%
$2,106
XDTE 0.97%
$18,198
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PEPS | XDTE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $1,712 | $1,529 |
| 20 | $717 | $6,443 | $5,726 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $18,198 | $16,092 |
- 0.10%PEPS, cheaper
- 0.97%XDTE
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
PEPS cheapest of 51 funds
XDTE 46th cheapest of 51 funds
PEPS vs XDTE Dividends
- PEPS 0.98%
- XDTE 29.86%, better
- PEPS $0.32
- XDTE $11.10
- PEPS $0.09
- XDTE $0.11
- PEPS Sep 21, 2026
- XDTE Nov 5, 2026
- PEPS Sep 25, 2026
- XDTE Nov 6, 2026
- PEPS Quarterly
- XDTE Weekly
Distribution history
PEPS vs XDTE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PEPS 12.9%XDTE 11.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- PEPS 0.85XDTE 0.85Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- PEPS −21.3%XDTE −19.0%
- Market sensitivity
- PEPS 1.02XDTE 0.91
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.