Skip to content

PFEB vs PSMR

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF

PFEBCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

PSMRBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

PSMR −0.30pt a year

PFEB0.79%PSMR0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

PFEB 22.4×the volume

PFEB28.3KPSMR1.26K

5Y return · a year

PFEB +0.3pt

PFEB+8.7%PSMR+8.4%

PFEB vs PSMR Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+51.5%PFEB+49.5%PSMR

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. PFEB +51.5%. PSMR +49.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%20%30%Nov 2021Apr 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
PFEB 0.79%
PSMR 0.49%, better
Fund size
PFEB $884M
PSMR $91M
1Y total return
PFEB +9.9%
PSMR +11.9%, better
Holdings
PFEB 3
PSMR 3
Avg volume (30D)
PFEB 28.3K sh, better
PSMR 1.26K sh
NAV per share
PFEB $44.07
PSMR $33.00
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PFEB: Cost 35, Risk 54, Mission not scored, Tradability 58, Holdings not scored, Durability 77. PSMR: Cost 70, Risk 57, Mission not scored, Tradability 32, Holdings not scored, Durability 64.
Pillar letters and Scores for PFEB, PSMR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPFEBPSMR
Cost30% weightD35A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC54B57Higher
Tradability15% weightB58HigherD32
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA77HigherB64

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PFEB and PSMR are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMR ranks 3rd and PFEB 14th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 4BBUFCAB Conservative Buffer ETFScore 55
  5. Rank 13CPJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 49
  6. Rank 14CPFEBInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 48
  7. Rank 14CPMAYInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - MayScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PFEBCInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF

PSMRBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

In short

PFEB February is the whole point. PFEB restarts each year with a fresh 15% cushion against SPY losses, in exchange for a ceiling on the upside that resets at the same time. Same recipe as its sibling months, different calendar.

PSMR A 15-point cushion on SPY, reset every April, for 0.49% a year while the typical buffer fund charges more. Pacer and Swan's moderate tier trades away some upside (a cap set each period) for a floor you know going in.

Stated mandate

PFEB The Fund seeks to follow SPY’s return up to a predetermined cap and protect investors from the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.

PSMR The Fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.

Why people hold it

  • PFEB The contract is simple: absorb the first 15% of SPY's decline over the outcome period, then follow SPY's gains up to a predetermined cap.innovatoretfs.com
  • The reference asset is SPY itself, not a bespoke in-house index. You are hedging the same S&P 500 exposure millions of people already hold.innovatoretfs.com
  • At 0.79%, the fee sits right at the middle of its buffer-fund cohort. The options machinery costs what it costs across this group.
  • Innovator has run the February lane since 2020, and the fund stands in the upper half of a crowded field of 15% buffer strategies.
  • PSMR Charges 0.49% a year against a 0.79% median in its buffered-SPY cohort, and undercuts Pacer's own single-month siblings like PJUL and POCT at 0.79%.
  • The contract is spelled out: a 15-point buffer against SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust losses over roughly a one-year period, with upside capped at a level set when the period begins.paceretfs.com
  • Terms reset on April 1 each year, so the new buffer and cap arrive on a known calendar date instead of whenever you happened to buy in.paceretfs.com
  • Running since 2021, so this April series has cycled through several complete outcome periods rather than being a fresh launch with a paper track record.

Worth knowing

  • PFEB Buffer and cap are defined for a full outcome period. Enter mid-period and you inherit whatever cushion and upside are left, not the headline 15%.innovatoretfs.com
  • The cap cuts both ways. In a roaring year for the S&P 500, participation stops where the cap stops.innovatoretfs.com
  • It trades less actively than the largest buffer ETFs, which can show up as wider bid-ask spreads. Also a price-return vehicle: no distribution stream.
  • PSMR Thinly traded next to the biggest names in buffer land, so spreads and order size are worth a look before you place a trade.
  • The cap cuts both ways: big SPY years get trimmed, and the stated buffer and cap only line up in full for a holder who rides one April reset to the next.
  • Not an income vehicle. It has not been paying a regular distribution, so whatever the strategy delivers shows up in the share price.

Full PFEB profile⁠

Full PSMR profile⁠

PFEB vs PSMR Holdings

How PFEB and PSMR differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of PFEB and 0.0% of PSMR.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%
  • Sector11 Sectors100%

Sector

Sector weights in PFEB and PSMR, widest gap first
SectorMore in PFEBMore in PSMR
TechnologySame weight
FinancialsSame weight
CommunicationSame weight
Health CareSame weight
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
Consumer StaplesSame weight
EnergySame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
Real EstateSame weight
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in PFEB and PSMR, widest gap first
CountryMore in PFEBMore in PSMR
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • PFEB102.6%
  • PSMR107.5%

Securities held

  • PFEB3
  • PSMR2

Asset class

PFEB
Equity
PSMR
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in PFEB3
  • In both0
  • Only in PSMR2

Only in PFEB

3 securities, 100% of PFEB by weight

  • Spy 01/29/2027 6.92 C101.08%
  • Spy 01/29/2027 691.97 P1.24%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.24%

Only in PSMR

2 securities, 100% of PSMR by weight

  • Spy 03/31/2027 7.22 C106.08%
  • Spy 03/31/2027 650.41 P1.18%

Weight gaps

PFEB and PSMR share no securities.

All 6 PFEB holdings⁠All 6 PSMR holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PFEB vs PSMR Cost

Overpaying PFEB vs PSMR

$5,382

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PFEB 0.79%

    $15,174

  • PSMR 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PFEB 0.79%
  • PSMR 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530PFEB $15,174PSMR $9,792

Year by year

YearPFEBPSMROverpaying
10$1,405$883$522
20$5,331$3,394$1,937
30$15,174$9,792$5,382

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%PFEB
  • 0.49%PSMR, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMR 5th cheapest of 51 funds

PFEB 24th cheapest of 51 funds

PFEB vs PSMR Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
PFEB None
PSMR None

Distribution history

PFEBAll PFEB payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMRAll PSMR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PFEB vs PSMR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • PFEB
  • PSMR
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: PFEB −11.0% · Jun 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−8%−6%−4%−2%0%Nov 2021Apr 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PFEB 6.1%PSMR 6.0%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PFEB 1.43, betterPSMR 1.31
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PFEB −11.0%, betterPSMR −11.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PFEB 0.45PSMR 0.45Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

Popular comparisons

  • PFEBCvsPSMOB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMRBvsPSMOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PFEBCvsPSMJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMRBvsPSMJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PFEBCvsBUFCB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMRBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.