PSMR ranks 3rd and PFEB 14th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
PFEB vs PSMR
0.0%by weight
PSMR −0.30pt a year
0.79%0.49%
PFEB 22.4×the volume
28.3K1.26K
PFEB +0.3pt
+8.7%+8.4%
PFEB vs PSMR Performance
+51.5%+49.5%
- PFEB 0.79%
- PSMR 0.49%, better
- PFEB $884M
- PSMR $91M
- PFEB +9.9%
- PSMR +11.9%, better
- PFEB 3
- PSMR 3
- PFEB 28.3K sh, better
- PSMR 1.26K sh
- PFEB $44.07
- PSMR $33.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PFEB | PSMR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A70Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C54 | B57Higher |
| Tradability | B58Higher | D32 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A77Higher | B64 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. PFEB and PSMR are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PFEBC
PSMRB
In short
PFEB February is the whole point. PFEB restarts each year with a fresh 15% cushion against SPY losses, in exchange for a ceiling on the upside that resets at the same time. Same recipe as its sibling months, different calendar.
PSMR A 15-point cushion on SPY, reset every April, for 0.49% a year while the typical buffer fund charges more. Pacer and Swan's moderate tier trades away some upside (a cap set each period) for a floor you know going in.
Stated mandate
PFEB The Fund seeks to follow SPY’s return up to a predetermined cap and protect investors from the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.
PSMR The Fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PFEB vs PSMR Holdings
How PFEB and PSMR differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of PFEB and 0.0% of PSMR.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in PFEBMore in PSMR | PFEB | PSMR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | Same weight | 40.1% | 40.1% |
| Financials | Same weight | 11.3% | 11.3% |
| Communication | Same weight | 9.9% | 9.9% |
| Health Care | Same weight | 9.4% | 9.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 8.7% | 8.7% |
| Industrials | Same weight | 7.6% | 7.6% |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 4.4% | 4.4% |
| Energy | Same weight | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in PFEBMore in PSMR | PFEB | PSMR |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- PFEB102.6%
- PSMR107.5%
- PFEB3
- PSMR2
Asset class
- PFEB
- Equity
- PSMR
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in PFEB3
- In both0
- Only in PSMR2
Only in PFEB
3 securities, 100% of PFEB by weight
- Spy 01/29/2027 6.92 C101.08%
- Spy 01/29/2027 691.97 P1.24%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.24%
Only in PSMR
2 securities, 100% of PSMR by weight
- Spy 03/31/2027 7.22 C106.08%
- Spy 03/31/2027 650.41 P1.18%
Weight gaps
PFEB and PSMR share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PFEB vs PSMR Cost
Overpaying PFEB vs PSMR
$5,382
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PFEB 0.79%
$15,174
PSMR 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PFEB | PSMR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $883 | $522 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $3,394 | $1,937 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $9,792 | $5,382 |
- 0.79%PFEB
- 0.49%PSMR, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
PSMR 5th cheapest of 51 funds
PFEB 24th cheapest of 51 funds
PFEB vs PSMR Dividends
- PFEB None
- PSMR None
Distribution history
PFEB vs PSMR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PFEB
- PSMR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PFEB 6.1%PSMR 6.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PFEB 1.43, betterPSMR 1.31
- Worst fall
- PFEB −11.0%, betterPSMR −11.8%
- Market sensitivity
- PFEB 0.45PSMR 0.45Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.