Skip to content

BUFC vs PFEB

AB Conservative Buffer ETF

BUFCBNasdaq

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF

PFEBCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

BUFC −0.10pt a year

BUFC0.69%PFEB0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

BUFC 1.7×the volume

BUFC49.5KPFEB28.3K

BUFC vs PFEB Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+5.7%BUFC+9.9%PFEB

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. BUFC +5.7%. PFEB +9.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%7.5%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BUFC 0.69%, better
PFEB 0.79%
Fund size
BUFC $1.1B
PFEB $884M
1Y total return
BUFC +5.7%
PFEB +9.9%, better
Holdings
BUFC 5
PFEB 3
Avg volume (30D)
BUFC 49.5K sh, better
PFEB 28.3K sh
NAV per share
BUFC $43.25
PFEB $44.07
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BUFC: Cost 57, Risk 41, Mission not scored, Tradability 62, Holdings not scored, Durability 74. PFEB: Cost 35, Risk 54, Mission not scored, Tradability 58, Holdings not scored, Durability 77.
Pillar letters and Scores for BUFC, PFEB, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBUFCPFEB
Cost30% weightB57HigherD35
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC41C54Higher
Tradability15% weightB62HigherB58
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA74A77Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BUFC and PFEB are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

BUFC ranks 4th and PFEB 14th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 4BBUFCAB Conservative Buffer ETFScore 55
  5. Rank 4BPOCTInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 13CPJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 49
  7. Rank 14CPFEBInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 48
  8. Rank 14CPMAYInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - MayScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BUFCBAB Conservative Buffer ETF

PFEBCInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF

In short

BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.

PFEB February is the whole point. PFEB restarts each year with a fresh 15% cushion against SPY losses, in exchange for a ceiling on the upside that resets at the same time. Same recipe as its sibling months, different calendar.

Stated mandate

BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.

PFEB The Fund seeks to follow SPY’s return up to a predetermined cap and protect investors from the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • BUFC Uses options to target 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 over rolling three-month periods, so the cushion resets four times a year instead of once.alliancebernstein.com
  • At 0.69%, it costs less than Innovator's 0.79% Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) and less than the typical fund in its buffer cohort.
  • Actively managed rather than pinned to a calendar index series, running since 2023, and among the stronger implementations in its buffer peer group.
  • PFEB The contract is simple: absorb the first 15% of SPY's decline over the outcome period, then follow SPY's gains up to a predetermined cap.innovatoretfs.com
  • The reference asset is SPY itself, not a bespoke in-house index. You are hedging the same S&P 500 exposure millions of people already hold.innovatoretfs.com
  • At 0.79%, the fee sits right at the middle of its buffer-fund cohort. The options machinery costs what it costs across this group.
  • Innovator has run the February lane since 2020, and the fund stands in the upper half of a crowded field of 15% buffer strategies.

Worth knowing

  • BUFC The price of that deep cushion: upside participation is targeted near 3% per three-month period, so big rallies mostly pass you by.
  • Protection is partial and period-based. Losses past the targeted 15% pass through, and buying mid-period shifts your effective buffer and cap.alliancebernstein.com
  • Thinly traded for its size, so spreads and limit orders deserve attention.
  • PFEB Buffer and cap are defined for a full outcome period. Enter mid-period and you inherit whatever cushion and upside are left, not the headline 15%.innovatoretfs.com
  • The cap cuts both ways. In a roaring year for the S&P 500, participation stops where the cap stops.innovatoretfs.com
  • It trades less actively than the largest buffer ETFs, which can show up as wider bid-ask spreads. Also a price-return vehicle: no distribution stream.

Full BUFC profile⁠

Full PFEB profile⁠

BUFC vs PFEB Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BUFC vs PFEB Cost

Overpaying PFEB vs BUFC

$1,745

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BUFC 0.69%

    $13,429

  • PFEB 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BUFC 0.69%
  • PFEB 0.79%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530PFEB $15,174BUFC $13,429

Year by year

YearBUFCPFEBOverpaying
10$1,232$1,405$173
20$4,697$5,331$634
30$13,429$15,174$1,745

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%BUFC, cheaper
  • 0.79%PFEB
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds

PFEB 24th cheapest of 51 funds

BUFC vs PFEB Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
BUFC None
PFEB None

Distribution history

BUFCAll BUFC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PFEBAll PFEB payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BUFC vs PFEB Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BUFC 3.4%since Jan 2024PFEB 6.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BUFC 0.82since Jan 2024PFEB 1.43
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BUFC −8.3%since Dec 2023PFEB −11.0%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BUFC 0.26PFEB 0.45

Popular comparisons

  • BUFCBvsPSMOB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PFEBCvsPSMOB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPSMJB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PFEBCvsPSMJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPSMRB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PFEBCvsPSMRB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.