SCYB ranks 2nd and PHYL 26th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
PHYL vs SCYB
SCYB −0.36pt a year
0.39%0.03%
SCYB 5.5×the volume
199K1.1M
PHYL +0.6pt
+8.3%+7.7%
PHYL vs SCYB Performance
+1.4%+2.0%
- PHYL 0.39%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- PHYL $1.52B
- SCYB $2.8B
- PHYL +1.4%
- SCYB +2.0%, better
- PHYL 7.80%
- SCYB 7.82%, better
- PHYL 832
- SCYB 1844
- PHYL 199K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- PHYL $33.40
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PHYL | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B58 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B56 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | C51 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | B67 | A99Higher |
| Durability | A70Higher | B68 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. PHYL and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PHYLB
SCYBA
In short
PHYL A junk-bond ETF with a human at the wheel. PGIM's credit team picks the roughly 500 bonds here instead of buying the index, and charges about what the average high-yield ETF charges to do it.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
PHYL The fund seeks total return from current income and capital appreciation.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PHYL vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PHYL vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying PHYL vs SCYB
$7,260
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PHYL 0.39%
$7,898
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PHYL | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $55 | $650 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $216 | $2,509 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $638 | $7,260 |
- 0.39%PHYL
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
PHYL 31st cheapest of 84 funds
PHYL vs SCYB Dividends
- PHYL 7.80%
- SCYB 7.82%, better
- PHYL $2.61
- SCYB $1.96
- PHYL $0.21
- SCYB $0.16
- PHYL Oct 30, 2026
- SCYB Nov 2, 2026
- PHYL Pays Nov 3, 2026
- SCYB Pays Nov 6, 2026
- PHYL Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
PHYL vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PHYL 5.0%SCYB 4.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PHYL 0.89, betterSCYB 0.82
- Worst fall
- PHYL −16.1%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- PHYL 0.71SCYB 0.28
PHYL and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
