PXH ranks 4th and PIE 9th of 10 funds in the Emerging Markets Factor Index Category.
PIE vs PXH
PXH −0.43pt a year
0.90%0.47%
PXH 3.0×the volume
73.8K223K
PIE +0.9pt
+9.2%+8.3%
PIE vs PXH Performance
+43.2%+59.1%
- PIE 0.90%
- PXH 0.47%, better
- PIE $250M
- PXH $1.94B
- PIE +31.6%, better
- PXH +13.1%
- PIE 2.38%
- PXH 4.13%, better
- PIE 107
- PXH 365
- PIE 73.8K sh
- PXH 223K sh, better
- PIE $31.39
- PXH $28.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PIE | PXH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F5 | C44Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D34 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | C52 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | B58Higher | B55 |
| Durability | B57 | A76Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Factor Index funds
Same Category. PIE and PXH are both graded against the same 10 Emerging Markets Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PIED
PXHB
In short
PIE A 2007-vintage emerging-markets fund that ignores market cap and follows price trends instead: Dorsey Wright's relative-strength rules rotate the portfolio toward the EM stocks already leading and away from the laggards.
PXH Most emerging-markets funds size positions by share price. PXH sizes them by economic footprint (sales, cash flow, dividends, book value), the fundamental-indexing approach it has run since 2007. A value-tilted EM portfolio built from the accounting statements up.
Stated mandate
PIE Seeks exposure to emerging-market equities selected using Dorsey Wright’s relative-strength (momentum) rules, via a Dorsey Wright emerging-markets momentum index.
PXH The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the investment results of the RAFI strategy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PIE vs PXH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PIE vs PXH Cost
Overpaying PIE vs PXH
$7,622
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PIE 0.90%
$17,040
PXH 0.47%
$9,418
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PIE | PXH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,593 | $847 | $746 |
| 20 | $6,015 | $3,261 | $2,754 |
| 30 | $17,040 | $9,418 | $7,622 |
- 0.90%PIE
- 0.47%PXH, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Factor Index funds
- Median 0.44%
PXH 6th cheapest of 10 funds
PIE 10th cheapest of 10 funds
PIE vs PXH Dividends
- PIE 2.38%
- PXH 4.13%, better
- PIE $0.74
- PXH $1.16
- PIE $0.26
- PXH $0.32
- PIE Sep 21, 2026
- PXH Sep 21, 2026
- PIE Sep 25, 2026
- PXH Sep 25, 2026
- PIE Quarterly
- PXH Quarterly
Distribution history
PIE vs PXH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PIE
- PXH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PIE 21.0%PXH 11.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PIE 0.92PXH 1.49, better
- Worst fall
- PIE −36.8%PXH −29.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- PIE 1.05PXH 0.76
Popular comparisons
- 0.90% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.