Skip to content

PIE vs PXH

Invesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Momentum ETF

PIEDNasdaq

Invesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF

PXHBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

PXH −0.43pt a year

PIE0.90%PXH0.47%

Avg volume · 30D

PXH 3.0×the volume

PIE73.8KPXH223K

10Y return · a year

PIE +0.9pt

PIE+9.2%PXH+8.3%

PIE vs PXH Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+43.2%PIE+59.1%PXH

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. PIE +43.2%. PXH +59.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PIE 0.90%
PXH 0.47%, better
Fund size
PIE $250M
PXH $1.94B
1Y total return
PIE +31.6%, better
PXH +13.1%
Yield (12M)
PIE 2.38%
PXH 4.13%, better
Holdings
PIE 107
PXH 365
Avg volume (30D)
PIE 73.8K sh
PXH 223K sh, better
NAV per share
PIE $31.39
PXH $28.02
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PIE: Cost 5, Risk 34, Mission not scored, Tradability 52, Holdings 58, Durability 57. PXH: Cost 44, Risk 63, Mission not scored, Tradability 77, Holdings 55, Durability 76.
Pillar letters and Scores for PIE, PXH, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPIEPXH
Cost30% weightF5C44Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD34B63Higher
Tradability15% weightC52A77Higher
Holdings10% weightB58HigherB55
Durability5% weightB57A76Higher

Rank among Emerging Markets Factor Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PIE and PXH are both graded against the same 10 Emerging Markets Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 10 ›

PXH ranks 4th and PIE 9th of 10 funds in the Emerging Markets Factor Index Category.

  1. Rank 1AEEMViShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETFScore 78
  2. Rank 2BEELVInvesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETFScore 66
  3. Rank 3BFNDESchwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETFScore 64
  4. Rank 4BPXHInvesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETFScore 57
  5. Rank 5CBLESInspire Global Hope ETFScore 50
  6. Rank 8DECOWPacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETFScore 37
  7. Rank 9DPIEInvesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Momentum ETFScore 30
  8. Rank 10FFLNFirst Trust Latin America AlphaDEX FundScore 23

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PIEDInvesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Momentum ETF

PXHBInvesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF

In short

PIE A 2007-vintage emerging-markets fund that ignores market cap and follows price trends instead: Dorsey Wright's relative-strength rules rotate the portfolio toward the EM stocks already leading and away from the laggards.

PXH Most emerging-markets funds size positions by share price. PXH sizes them by economic footprint (sales, cash flow, dividends, book value), the fundamental-indexing approach it has run since 2007. A value-tilted EM portfolio built from the accounting statements up.

Stated mandate

PIE Seeks exposure to emerging-market equities selected using Dorsey Wright’s relative-strength (momentum) rules, via a Dorsey Wright emerging-markets momentum index.

PXH The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the investment results of the RAFI strategy.

Why people hold it

  • PIE Momentum is the entire thesis, not a tilt: a Dorsey Wright relative-strength index selects roughly 100 emerging-market names on price trend rather than size.
  • Live since 2007, so the rules have run through multiple EM boom and bust cycles rather than a single favorable stretch.
  • Spreads across roughly 100 stocks, pays quarterly, and trades with moderate volume, so it is not a thinly traded curiosity despite the specialist strategy.
  • PXH Position sizes come from book value, cash flow, sales and dividends, not market price, so a stock rallying does not automatically earn a bigger slot in the fund.invesco.comlseg.com
  • Running since 2007, one of the longest-lived fundamental-index plays in emerging markets, now at billion-dollar scale and moderately traded.
  • Roughly 400 stocks across emerging markets, paid out quarterly. Broad coverage rather than a concentrated country or sector bet.

Worth knowing

  • PIE At 0.90% a year it costs more than the typical active EM fund (0.65% cohort median) and roughly triple systematic peers like AVEM and DFEM (0.33% and 0.39%).
  • Chasing relative strength means country, sector and turnover can look nothing like a broad EM index, and the ride is bumpier than a cap-weighted core holding.
  • It lands in the lower half of our active emerging-markets group, where the funds at the top are broader and considerably cheaper.
  • PXH At 0.47% it costs a shade more than the 0.45% median index tracker, and multiples of the cheapest broad index funds (VT charges 0.06%).
  • Weighting by fundamentals means the portfolio can look very different from cap-weighted EM benchmarks, and move differently from them for long stretches.lseg.cominvesco.com
  • The benchmark switched in 2025 (it was the FTSE RAFI Emerging Index before), so the fund's long history predates today's selection rules.invesco.com

Full PIE profile⁠

Full PXH profile⁠

PIE vs PXH Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PIE vs PXH Cost

Overpaying PIE vs PXH

$7,622

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PIE 0.90%

    $17,040

  • PXH 0.47%

    $9,418

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PIE 0.90%
  • PXH 0.47%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530PIE $17,040PXH $9,418

Year by year

YearPIEPXHOverpaying
10$1,593$847$746
20$6,015$3,261$2,754
30$17,040$9,418$7,622

Expense ratio

  • 0.90%PIE
  • 0.47%PXH, cheaper
  • Middle half of Emerging Markets Factor Index funds
  • Median 0.44%

PXH 6th cheapest of 10 funds

PIE 10th cheapest of 10 funds

PIE vs PXH Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
PIE 2.38%
PXH 4.13%, better
Payout (12M)
PIE $0.74
PXH $1.16
Last payment
PIE $0.26
PXH $0.32
Ex-dividend
PIE Sep 21, 2026
PXH Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
PIE Sep 25, 2026
PXH Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
PIE Quarterly
PXH Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

PIEQuarterly · 34 paymentsAll PIE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 34 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Sep 18, 2017 $0.16; Dec 18, 2017 $0.17; Jun 18, 2018 $0.11; Sep 24, 2018 $0.21; Dec 24, 2018 $0.19; Jun 24, 2019 $0.07; Sep 23, 2019 $0.15; Dec 23, 2019 $0.15; Mar 23, 2020 $0.0051; Jun 22, 2020 $0.03; Sep 21, 2020 $0.16; Dec 21, 2020 $0.11; Mar 22, 2021 $0.0062; Jun 21, 2021 $0.03; Sep 20, 2021 $0.14; Dec 20, 2021 $0.15; Jun 21, 2022 $0.22; Sep 19, 2022 $0.34; Dec 19, 2022 $0.05; Mar 20, 2023 $0.06; Jun 20, 2023 $0.10; Sep 18, 2023 $0.29; Dec 18, 2023 $0.06; Mar 18, 2024 $0.03; Jun 24, 2024 $0.24; Sep 23, 2024 $0.14; Dec 23, 2024 $0.04; Mar 24, 2025 $0.008; Jun 23, 2025 $0.21; Sep 22, 2025 $0.08; Dec 22, 2025 $0.24; Mar 23, 2026 $0.03; Jun 22, 2026 $0.22; Sep 21, 2026 $0.26. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
PXHQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll PXH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.01; Jun 16, 2017 $0.11; Sep 18, 2017 $0.34; Dec 18, 2017 $0.15; Mar 19, 2018 $0.03; Jun 18, 2018 $0.16; Sep 24, 2018 $0.37; Dec 24, 2018 $0.09; Mar 18, 2019 $0.04; Jun 24, 2019 $0.19; Sep 23, 2019 $0.38; Dec 23, 2019 $0.11; Mar 23, 2020 $0.06; Jun 22, 2020 $0.19; Sep 21, 2020 $0.27; Dec 21, 2020 $0.07; Mar 22, 2021 $0.02; Jun 21, 2021 $0.23; Sep 20, 2021 $0.31; Dec 20, 2021 $0.46; Mar 21, 2022 $0.05; Jun 21, 2022 $0.39; Sep 19, 2022 $0.39; Dec 19, 2022 $0.11; Mar 20, 2023 $0.13; Jun 20, 2023 $0.27; Sep 18, 2023 $0.36; Dec 18, 2023 $0.17; Mar 18, 2024 $0.06; Jun 24, 2024 $0.30; Sep 23, 2024 $0.34; Dec 23, 2024 $0.20; Mar 24, 2025 $0.12; Jun 23, 2025 $0.16; Sep 22, 2025 $0.38; Dec 22, 2025 $0.38; Mar 23, 2026 $0.09; Jun 22, 2026 $0.37; Sep 21, 2026 $0.32. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

PIE vs PXH Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • PIE
  • PXH
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: PIE −36.8% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PIE 21.0%PXH 11.2%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PIE 0.92PXH 1.49, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PIE −36.8%PXH −29.6%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PIE 1.05PXH 0.76

Popular comparisons

  • PIEDvsEEMVA

    Invesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Momentum ETF · iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PXHBvsEEMVA

    Invesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF · iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PIEDvsEELVB

    Invesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Momentum ETF · Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PXHBvsEELVB

    Invesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF · Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PIEDvsFNDEB

    Invesco Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Momentum ETF · Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PXHBvsFNDEB

    Invesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF · Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.