XLV ranks 1st and PINK 14th of 25 funds in the Health Care (Broad) Category.
PINK vs XLV
XLV −0.43pt a year
0.51%0.08%
XLV 109.7×the volume
83K9.1M
PINK +1.3pt
+9.7%+8.4%
PINK vs XLV Performance
+58.9%+49.8%
- PINK 0.51%
- XLV 0.08%, better
- PINK $345M
- XLV $48.5B
- PINK +22.7%
- XLV +30.3%, better
- PINK 0.74%
- XLV 1.38%, better
- PINK 52
- XLV 64
- PINK 83K sh
- XLV 9.1M sh, better
- PINK $40.65
- XLV $184.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PINK | XLV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C46 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | B55 | A78Higher |
| Tradability | C49 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | C47Higher | D39 |
| Durability | C53 | A87Higher |
Rank among Health Care (Broad) funds
Same Category. PINK and XLV are both graded against the same 25 Health Care (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PINKC
XLVA
In short
PINK Most big health care ETFs just buy the index and sit still. PINK is a stock picker: roughly 60 U.S. names chosen bottom-up, multi-cap, growth-leaning, with room to back companies developing new medicines or cutting system costs.
XLV Live since 1998, XLV is the original way to own health care: about 60 S&P 500 names, a 0.08% fee, and one of the busiest tickers in the sector. Big pharma and device makers, not small-cap biotech.
Stated mandate
PINK PINK seeks long-term capital appreciation through U.S. health care companies, using a multi-cap, fundamental bottom-up approach. It generally follows a growth strategy and may emphasize companies developing medicines or improving health-care-system cost or quality.
XLV The fund seeks to track, before expenses, the price and yield performance of the Health Care Select Sector Index, which represents the health care sector of the S&P 500 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PINK vs XLV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PINK vs XLV Cost
Overpaying PINK vs XLV
$8,476
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PINK 0.51%
$10,165
XLV 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PINK | XLV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $918 | $147 | $771 |
| 20 | $3,527 | $575 | $2,952 |
| 30 | $10,165 | $1,689 | $8,476 |
- 0.51%PINK
- 0.08%XLV, cheaper
- Middle half of Health Care (Broad) funds
- Median 0.50%
XLV cheapest of 25 funds
PINK 14th cheapest of 25 funds
PINK vs XLV Dividends
- PINK 0.74%
- XLV 1.38%, better
- PINK $0.30
- XLV $2.55
- PINK $0.10
- XLV $0.64
- PINK Sep 25, 2026
- XLV Sep 21, 2026
- PINK Sep 30, 2026
- XLV Sep 23, 2026
- PINK Quarterly
- XLV Quarterly
Distribution history
PINK vs XLV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PINK
- XLV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PINK 16.1%XLV 14.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PINK 0.94, betterXLV 0.78
- Worst fall
- PINK −18.8%XLV −17.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- PINK 0.73XLV 0.56
PINK and XLV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.51% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





