Skip to content

PINK vs XLV

Simplify Health Care ETF

PINKCNYSE Arca

State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF

XLVANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

XLV −0.43pt a year

PINK0.51%XLV0.08%

Avg volume · 30D

XLV 109.7×the volume

PINK83KXLV9.1M

5Y return · a year

PINK +1.3pt

PINK+9.7%XLV+8.4%

PINK vs XLV Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+58.9%PINK+49.8%XLV

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. PINK +58.9%. XLV +49.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PINK 0.51%
XLV 0.08%, better
Fund size
PINK $345M
XLV $48.5B
1Y total return
PINK +22.7%
XLV +30.3%, better
Yield (12M)
PINK 0.74%
XLV 1.38%, better
Holdings
PINK 52
XLV 64
Avg volume (30D)
PINK 83K sh
XLV 9.1M sh, better
NAV per share
PINK $40.65
XLV $184.09
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PINK: Cost 46, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 49, Holdings 47, Durability 53. XLV: Cost 98, Risk 78, Mission 84, Tradability 100, Holdings 39, Durability 87.
Pillar letters and Scores for PINK, XLV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPINKXLV
Cost30% weightC46A98Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA84
Risk15% weightB55A78Higher
Tradability15% weightC49A100Higher
Holdings10% weightC47HigherD39
Durability5% weightC53A87Higher

Rank among Health Care (Broad) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PINK and XLV are both graded against the same 25 Health Care (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Health Care (Broad)⁠

Category · 25 funds
See all 25 ›

XLV ranks 1st and PINK 14th of 25 funds in the Health Care (Broad) Category.

  1. Rank 1AXLVState Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AFHLCFidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETFScore 83
  3. Rank 14CFMEDFidelity Disruptive Medicine ETFScore 48
  4. Rank 14CPINKSimplify Health Care ETFScore 48
  5. Rank 16CHTECROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PINKCSimplify Health Care ETF

XLVAState Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF

In short

PINK Most big health care ETFs just buy the index and sit still. PINK is a stock picker: roughly 60 U.S. names chosen bottom-up, multi-cap, growth-leaning, with room to back companies developing new medicines or cutting system costs.

XLV Live since 1998, XLV is the original way to own health care: about 60 S&P 500 names, a 0.08% fee, and one of the busiest tickers in the sector. Big pharma and device makers, not small-cap biotech.

Stated mandate

PINK PINK seeks long-term capital appreciation through U.S. health care companies, using a multi-cap, fundamental bottom-up approach. It generally follows a growth strategy and may emphasize companies developing medicines or improving health-care-system cost or quality.

XLV The fund seeks to track, before expenses, the price and yield performance of the Health Care Select Sector Index, which represents the health care sector of the S&P 500 Index.

Why people hold it

  • PINK Active by design: about 60 U.S. health care names picked bottom-up, not several hundred sorted by market cap. Concentration cuts both ways, but each pick actually matters here.
  • Measured against an all-cap health care benchmark, so small and mid caps are in play, not just the megacap pharma that dominates S&P 500 based sector funds like XLV and RSPH.
  • Charges 0.51%, right at the category median, which is unusual pricing for a hand-picked portfolio rather than an index feed.
  • Sits in the upper half of the broad health care sector group on our review, and pays out quarterly.
  • XLV 0.08% a year against a cohort median of 0.50%. That ties it with FHLC as the cheapest in the group and edges VHT at 0.09%.
  • One of the most actively traded funds in its category, which generally keeps bid-ask spreads thin whether you trade 10 shares or 10,000.
  • Launched December 1998 as one of the first US sector funds, and it has tracked its S&P 500 health care index closely ever since.
  • Covers the whole sector in one line: pharma, devices, providers, biotech, life-science tools and health tech. Pays quarterly.ssga.com

Worth knowing

  • PINK The category's index heavyweights (VHT, FHLC, XLV) charge under a tenth of a percent. PINK's fee is roughly six times that, and it buys the manager's judgment.
  • No index to hug. Holdings come from a manager's calls, so the fund can sit far from the health care benchmark in either direction.
  • One sector, one country, about 60 holdings, growth lean. Trial results and health policy headlines land with full force here.
  • XLV Cap-weighted and about 60 names deep, so the largest drug and device makers carry most of the weight.ssga.com
  • S&P 500 members only. Mid- and small-cap health care names sit outside the mandate.
  • One sector, one set of headlines: drug pricing rules, patent expirations and policy shifts move the whole basket together.

Full PINK profile⁠

Full XLV profile⁠

PINK vs XLV Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PINK vs XLV Cost

Overpaying PINK vs XLV

$8,476

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PINK 0.51%

    $10,165

  • XLV 0.08%

    $1,689

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PINK 0.51%
  • XLV 0.08%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530PINK $10,165XLV $1,689

Year by year

YearPINKXLVOverpaying
10$918$147$771
20$3,527$575$2,952
30$10,165$1,689$8,476

Expense ratio

  • 0.51%PINK
  • 0.08%XLV, cheaper
  • Middle half of Health Care (Broad) funds
  • Median 0.50%

XLV cheapest of 25 funds

PINK 14th cheapest of 25 funds

PINK vs XLV Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
PINK 0.74%
XLV 1.38%, better
Payout (12M)
PINK $0.30
XLV $2.55
Last payment
PINK $0.10
XLV $0.64
Ex-dividend
PINK Sep 25, 2026
XLV Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
PINK Sep 30, 2026
XLV Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
PINK Quarterly
XLV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

PINKQuarterly · 20 paymentsAll PINK payments⁠
One bar per payment. 20 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2021 $0.01; Mar 28, 2022 $0.04; Jun 27, 2022 $0.03; Sep 27, 2022 $0.03; Dec 27, 2022 $0.02; Mar 27, 2023 $0.02; Jun 27, 2023 $0.13; Sep 27, 2023 $0.03; Dec 26, 2023 $0.08; Mar 25, 2024 $0.03; Jun 25, 2024 $0.03; Sep 25, 2024 $0.02; Dec 23, 2024 $0.01; Mar 26, 2025 $0.05; Jun 25, 2025 $0.05; Sep 25, 2025 $0.05; Dec 23, 2025 $0.10; Mar 26, 2026 $0.05; Jun 25, 2026 $0.05; Sep 25, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
XLVQuarterly · 40 paymentsAll XLV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 40 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.27; Jun 16, 2017 $0.31; Sep 15, 2017 $0.30; Dec 15, 2017 $0.33; Mar 16, 2018 $0.30; Jun 15, 2018 $0.32; Sep 21, 2018 $0.37; Dec 21, 2018 $0.38; Mar 15, 2019 $0.34; Jun 21, 2019 $0.40; Sep 20, 2019 $0.38; Dec 20, 2019 $0.42; Dec 30, 2019 $0.67; Mar 23, 2020 $0.38; Jun 22, 2020 $0.42; Sep 21, 2020 $0.42; Dec 21, 2020 $0.46; Mar 22, 2021 $0.40; Jun 21, 2021 $0.48; Sep 20, 2021 $0.47; Dec 20, 2021 $0.53; Mar 21, 2022 $0.43; Jun 21, 2022 $0.50; Sep 19, 2022 $0.51; Dec 19, 2022 $0.56; Mar 20, 2023 $0.49; Jun 20, 2023 $0.54; Sep 18, 2023 $0.54; Dec 18, 2023 $0.60; Mar 18, 2024 $0.52; Jun 24, 2024 $0.57; Sep 23, 2024 $0.58; Dec 23, 2024 $0.62; Mar 24, 2025 $0.56; Jun 23, 2025 $0.63; Sep 22, 2025 $0.62; Dec 22, 2025 $0.66; Mar 23, 2026 $0.59; Jun 22, 2026 $0.66; Sep 21, 2026 $0.64. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

PINK vs XLV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • PINK
  • XLV
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: PINK −18.8% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PINK 16.1%XLV 14.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PINK 0.94, betterXLV 0.78
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PINK −18.8%XLV −17.1%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PINK 0.73XLV 0.56

PINK and XLV in the news

Popular comparisons

  • PINKCvsFHLCA

    Simplify Health Care ETF · Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.51% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLVAvsFHLCA

    State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF · Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PINKCvsVHTA

    Simplify Health Care ETF · Vanguard Health Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.51% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLVAvsVHTA

    State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF · Vanguard Health Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PINKCvsXHSA

    Simplify Health Care ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.51% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLVAvsXHSA

    State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.