VHT ranks 3rd and PINK 14th of 25 funds in the Health Care (Broad) Category.
PINK vs VHT
VHT −0.42pt a year
0.51%0.09%
VHT 2.9×the volume
83K237K
PINK +2.2pt
+9.3%+7.1%
PINK vs VHT Performance
+56.2%+40.9%
- PINK 0.51%
- VHT 0.09%, better
- PINK $345M
- VHT $21.8B
- PINK +21.0%
- VHT +28.3%, better
- PINK 0.75%
- VHT 1.35%, better
- PINK 52
- VHT 416
- PINK 83K sh
- VHT 237K sh, better
- PINK $40.65
- VHT $342.46
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PINK | VHT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C46 | A92Higher |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | B55 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | C49 | B57Higher |
| Holdings | C47 | B58Higher |
| Durability | C53 | A92Higher |
Rank among Health Care (Broad) funds
Same Category. PINK and VHT are both graded against the same 25 Health Care (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PINKC
VHTA
In short
PINK Most big health care ETFs just buy the index and sit still. PINK is a stock picker: roughly 60 U.S. names chosen bottom-up, multi-cap, growth-leaning, with room to back companies developing new medicines or cutting system costs.
VHT The whole US health care sector in one ticket: roughly 400 stocks, an index that reaches well past the megacaps, and a nine-basis-point fee. Trading since 2004, it is one of the category's originals.
Stated mandate
PINK PINK seeks long-term capital appreciation through U.S. health care companies, using a multi-cap, fundamental bottom-up approach. It generally follows a growth strategy and may emphasize companies developing medicines or improving health-care-system cost or quality.
VHT The fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of health care stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PINK vs VHT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PINK vs VHT Cost
Overpaying PINK vs VHT
$8,267
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PINK 0.51%
$10,165
VHT 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PINK | VHT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $918 | $165 | $753 |
| 20 | $3,527 | $646 | $2,881 |
| 30 | $10,165 | $1,898 | $8,267 |
- 0.51%PINK
- 0.09%VHT, cheaper
- Middle half of Health Care (Broad) funds
- Median 0.50%
VHT 3rd cheapest of 25 funds
PINK 14th cheapest of 25 funds
PINK vs VHT Dividends
- PINK 0.75%
- VHT 1.35%, better
- PINK $0.30
- VHT $4.61
- PINK $0.10
- VHT $0.97
- PINK Sep 25, 2026
- VHT Sep 23, 2026
- PINK Sep 30, 2026
- VHT Sep 25, 2026
- PINK Quarterly
- VHT Quarterly
Distribution history
PINK vs VHT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PINK
- VHT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PINK 16.1%VHT 14.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PINK 0.94, betterVHT 0.83
- Worst fall
- PINK −18.8%VHT −17.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- PINK 0.73VHT 0.58
PINK and VHT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.51% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

