FHLC ranks 2nd and PINK 14th of 25 funds in the Health Care (Broad) Category.
FHLC vs PINK
FHLC −0.43pt a year
0.08%0.51%
FHLC 3.0×the volume
246K83K
PINK +2.2pt
+7.1%+9.3%
FHLC vs PINK Performance
+41.1%+56.2%
- FHLC 0.08%, better
- PINK 0.51%
- FHLC $3.54B
- PINK $345M
- FHLC +28.5%, better
- PINK +21.0%
- FHLC 1.15%, better
- PINK 0.75%
- FHLC 344
- PINK 52
- FHLC 246K sh, better
- PINK 83K sh
- FHLC $88.53
- PINK $40.65
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FHLC | PINK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | C46 |
| Mission | A81 | |
| Risk | A79Higher | B55 |
| Tradability | A79Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | C54Higher | C47 |
| Durability | A77Higher | C53 |
Rank among Health Care (Broad) funds
Same Category. FHLC and PINK are both graded against the same 25 Health Care (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FHLCA
PINKC
In short
FHLC Health care, whole market. FHLC tracks an MSCI index that runs from mega-cap pharma down to small-cap biotech and device makers, roughly 400 names, for 0.08% a year.
PINK Most big health care ETFs just buy the index and sit still. PINK is a stock picker: roughly 60 U.S. names chosen bottom-up, multi-cap, growth-leaning, with room to back companies developing new medicines or cutting system costs.
Stated mandate
FHLC The fund seeks to track the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index before fees and expenses.
PINK PINK seeks long-term capital appreciation through U.S. health care companies, using a multi-cap, fundamental bottom-up approach. It generally follows a growth strategy and may emphasize companies developing medicines or improving health-care-system cost or quality.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FHLC vs PINK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FHLC vs PINK Cost
Overpaying PINK vs FHLC
$8,392
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FHLC 0.084%
$1,773
PINK 0.51%
$10,165
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FHLC | PINK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $154 | $918 | $764 |
| 20 | $603 | $3,527 | $2,924 |
| 30 | $1,773 | $10,165 | $8,392 |
- 0.08%FHLC, cheaper
- 0.51%PINK
- Middle half of Health Care (Broad) funds
- Median 0.50%
FHLC 2nd cheapest of 25 funds
PINK 14th cheapest of 25 funds
FHLC vs PINK Dividends
- FHLC 1.15%, better
- PINK 0.75%
- FHLC $1.02
- PINK $0.30
- FHLC $0.25
- PINK $0.10
- FHLC Sep 18, 2026
- PINK Sep 25, 2026
- FHLC Sep 22, 2026
- PINK Sep 30, 2026
- FHLC Quarterly
- PINK Quarterly
Distribution history
FHLC vs PINK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FHLC
- PINK
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FHLC 14.5%, betterPINK 16.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- FHLC 0.83PINK 0.94, better
- Worst fall
- FHLC −17.7%, betterPINK −18.8%
- Market sensitivity
- FHLC 0.59PINK 0.73
FHLC and PINK in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
