Skip to content

FHLC vs PINK

Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF

FHLCANYSE Arca

Simplify Health Care ETF

PINKCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

FHLC −0.43pt a year

FHLC0.08%PINK0.51%

Avg volume · 30D

FHLC 3.0×the volume

FHLC246KPINK83K

5Y return · a year

PINK +2.2pt

FHLC+7.1%PINK+9.3%

FHLC vs PINK Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+41.1%FHLC+56.2%PINK

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. FHLC +41.1%. PINK +56.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FHLC 0.08%, better
PINK 0.51%
Fund size
FHLC $3.54B
PINK $345M
1Y total return
FHLC +28.5%, better
PINK +21.0%
Yield (12M)
FHLC 1.15%, better
PINK 0.75%
Holdings
FHLC 344
PINK 52
Avg volume (30D)
FHLC 246K sh, better
PINK 83K sh
NAV per share
FHLC $88.53
PINK $40.65
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FHLC: Cost 98, Risk 79, Mission 81, Tradability 79, Holdings 54, Durability 77. PINK: Cost 46, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 49, Holdings 47, Durability 53.
Pillar letters and Scores for FHLC, PINK, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFHLCPINK
Cost30% weightA98HigherC46
Mission25% weightA81Not scored
Risk15% weightA79HigherB55
Tradability15% weightA79HigherC49
Holdings10% weightC54HigherC47
Durability5% weightA77HigherC53

Rank among Health Care (Broad) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FHLC and PINK are both graded against the same 25 Health Care (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Health Care (Broad)⁠

Category · 25 funds
See all 25 ›

FHLC ranks 2nd and PINK 14th of 25 funds in the Health Care (Broad) Category.

  1. Rank 1AXLVState Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AFHLCFidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETFScore 83
  3. Rank 3AVHTVanguard Health Care ETFScore 77
  4. Rank 14CFMEDFidelity Disruptive Medicine ETFScore 48
  5. Rank 14CPINKSimplify Health Care ETFScore 48
  6. Rank 16CHTECROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FHLCAFidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF

PINKCSimplify Health Care ETF

In short

FHLC Health care, whole market. FHLC tracks an MSCI index that runs from mega-cap pharma down to small-cap biotech and device makers, roughly 400 names, for 0.08% a year.

PINK Most big health care ETFs just buy the index and sit still. PINK is a stock picker: roughly 60 U.S. names chosen bottom-up, multi-cap, growth-leaning, with room to back companies developing new medicines or cutting system costs.

Stated mandate

FHLC The fund seeks to track the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index before fees and expenses.

PINK PINK seeks long-term capital appreciation through U.S. health care companies, using a multi-cap, fundamental bottom-up approach. It generally follows a growth strategy and may emphasize companies developing medicines or improving health-care-system cost or quality.

Why people hold it

  • FHLC Charges 0.08% a year against a 0.50% median for broad health care ETFs. Only XLV matches that sticker; VHT sits a hair above.
  • The IMI index it follows reaches for about 99% of US free-float market value, so smaller biotech and device names ride along with the pharma giants.msci.com
  • Mirrors its benchmark closely, one of the tighter tracking jobs among broad health care funds. Distributions come quarterly.
  • Fidelity has run it since 2013, and it has grown into a multi-billion-dollar fund with a plain vanilla index mandate.fidelity.com
  • PINK Active by design: about 60 U.S. health care names picked bottom-up, not several hundred sorted by market cap. Concentration cuts both ways, but each pick actually matters here.
  • Measured against an all-cap health care benchmark, so small and mid caps are in play, not just the megacap pharma that dominates S&P 500 based sector funds like XLV and RSPH.
  • Charges 0.51%, right at the category median, which is unusual pricing for a hand-picked portfolio rather than an index feed.
  • Sits in the upper half of the broad health care sector group on our review, and pays out quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • FHLC One sector, one country. Drug-pricing politics, patent cliffs and FDA rulings move the whole portfolio at once.
  • Free-float cap weighting means a handful of mega-cap insurers and drugmakers carry most of the weight; that long tail of small names counts for less than it looks.msci.com
  • Moderately traded rather than the category's volume leader, so spreads matter more on large or hurried orders.
  • PINK The category's index heavyweights (VHT, FHLC, XLV) charge under a tenth of a percent. PINK's fee is roughly six times that, and it buys the manager's judgment.
  • No index to hug. Holdings come from a manager's calls, so the fund can sit far from the health care benchmark in either direction.
  • One sector, one country, about 60 holdings, growth lean. Trial results and health policy headlines land with full force here.

Full FHLC profile⁠

Full PINK profile⁠

FHLC vs PINK Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FHLC vs PINK Cost

Overpaying PINK vs FHLC

$8,392

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FHLC 0.084%

    $1,773

  • PINK 0.51%

    $10,165

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FHLC 0.084%
  • PINK 0.51%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530PINK $10,165FHLC $1,773

Year by year

YearFHLCPINKOverpaying
10$154$918$764
20$603$3,527$2,924
30$1,773$10,165$8,392

Expense ratio

  • 0.08%FHLC, cheaper
  • 0.51%PINK
  • Middle half of Health Care (Broad) funds
  • Median 0.50%

FHLC 2nd cheapest of 25 funds

PINK 14th cheapest of 25 funds

FHLC vs PINK Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
FHLC 1.15%, better
PINK 0.75%
Payout (12M)
FHLC $1.02
PINK $0.30
Last payment
FHLC $0.25
PINK $0.10
Ex-dividend
FHLC Sep 18, 2026
PINK Sep 25, 2026
Paid on
FHLC Sep 22, 2026
PINK Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
FHLC Quarterly
PINK Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FHLCQuarterly · 40 paymentsAll FHLC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 40 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.13; Jun 16, 2017 $0.14; Sep 15, 2017 $0.13; Dec 15, 2017 $0.16; Mar 16, 2018 $0.13; Jun 15, 2018 $0.15; Sep 21, 2018 $0.14; Dec 21, 2018 $0.15; Dec 28, 2018 $0.32; Mar 15, 2019 $0.16; Jun 21, 2019 $0.16; Sep 20, 2019 $0.17; Dec 20, 2019 $0.09; Mar 20, 2020 $0.25; Jun 19, 2020 $0.17; Sep 18, 2020 $0.18; Dec 18, 2020 $0.23; Mar 19, 2021 $0.20; Jun 18, 2021 $0.18; Sep 17, 2021 $0.19; Dec 17, 2021 $0.22; Mar 18, 2022 $0.22; Jun 17, 2022 $0.20; Sep 16, 2022 $0.22; Dec 16, 2022 $0.19; Mar 17, 2023 $0.23; Jun 16, 2023 $0.23; Sep 15, 2023 $0.22; Dec 15, 2023 $0.22; Mar 15, 2024 $0.24; Jun 21, 2024 $0.24; Sep 20, 2024 $0.25; Dec 20, 2024 $0.26; Mar 21, 2025 $0.25; Jun 20, 2025 $0.26; Sep 19, 2025 $0.26; Dec 19, 2025 $0.27; Mar 20, 2026 $0.23; Jun 18, 2026 $0.26; Sep 18, 2026 $0.25. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
PINKQuarterly · 20 paymentsAll PINK payments⁠
One bar per payment. 20 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2021 $0.01; Mar 28, 2022 $0.04; Jun 27, 2022 $0.03; Sep 27, 2022 $0.03; Dec 27, 2022 $0.02; Mar 27, 2023 $0.02; Jun 27, 2023 $0.13; Sep 27, 2023 $0.03; Dec 26, 2023 $0.08; Mar 25, 2024 $0.03; Jun 25, 2024 $0.03; Sep 25, 2024 $0.02; Dec 23, 2024 $0.01; Mar 26, 2025 $0.05; Jun 25, 2025 $0.05; Sep 25, 2025 $0.05; Dec 23, 2025 $0.10; Mar 26, 2026 $0.05; Jun 25, 2026 $0.05; Sep 25, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

FHLC vs PINK Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FHLC
  • PINK
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: PINK −18.8% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−10%−5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FHLC 14.5%, betterPINK 16.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FHLC 0.83PINK 0.94, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FHLC −17.7%, betterPINK −18.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FHLC 0.59PINK 0.73

FHLC and PINK in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FHLCAvsXLVA

    Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF · State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PINKCvsXLVA

    Simplify Health Care ETF · State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.51% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FHLCAvsVHTA

    Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF · Vanguard Health Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PINKCvsVHTA

    Simplify Health Care ETF · Vanguard Health Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.51% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FHLCAvsXHSA

    Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PINKCvsXHSA

    Simplify Health Care ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.51% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.