TSLS ranks 3rd and PLTZ 18th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
PLTZ vs TSLS
TSLS −0.36pt a year
1.31%0.95%
PLTZ 8.5×the volume
3.5M410K
PLTZ vs TSLS Performance
−65.6%+1.0%
- PLTZ 1.31%
- TSLS 0.95%, better
- PLTZ $31M
- TSLS $39M
- PLTZ −65.6%
- TSLS +1.0%, better
- PLTZ
- TSLS 3.11%
- PLTZ 3
- TSLS 4
- PLTZ 3.5M sh, better
- TSLS 410K sh
- PLTZ $7.74
- TSLS $50.04
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PLTZ | TSLS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C49 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A95Higher | A87 |
| Risk | C50 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | B64Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B65 | A82Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. PLTZ and TSLS are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PLTZB
TSLSA
In short
PLTZ Palantir's double-dose bear trade. PLTZ aims for two times the inverse of PLTR's daily move using swaps and options, with a daily reset that makes it a short-horizon tool rather than a set-and-forget short.
TSLS The plain short on Tesla: TSLS aims for -1x the stock's daily move, with no leverage stacked on top. Among the small group of Tesla bear funds, it is the cheapest, and the one that dials risk down rather than up.
Stated mandate
PLTZ The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to two times the inverse of the daily percentage change in Palantir Technologies Inc. common stock, using swaps and/or listed options.
TSLS The Fund seeks daily inverse investment results by maintaining short exposure to TSLA of approximately -100% of its net assets and generally rebalancing that exposure each trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PLTZ vs TSLS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PLTZ vs TSLS Cost
Overpaying PLTZ vs TSLS
$5,650
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PLTZ 1.31%
$23,519
TSLS 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PLTZ | TSLS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,280 | $1,678 | $602 |
| 20 | $8,450 | $6,322 | $2,128 |
| 30 | $23,519 | $17,869 | $5,650 |
- 1.31%PLTZ
- 0.95%TSLS, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSLS 2nd cheapest of 43 funds
PLTZ 27th cheapest of 43 funds
PLTZ vs TSLS Dividends
- PLTZ
- TSLS 3.11%
- PLTZ None
- TSLS $1.57
- PLTZ
- TSLS $0.40
- PLTZ
- TSLS Sep 22, 2026
- PLTZ
- TSLS Sep 29, 2026
- PLTZ
- TSLS Quarterly
Distribution history
PLTZ vs TSLS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PLTZ 109.7%TSLS 51.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- PLTZ −0.72TSLS −0.76
- Worst fall
- PLTZ −91.0%TSLS −90.7%
- Market sensitivity
- PLTZ −1.36TSLS −1.41
Popular comparisons
- 1.31% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.