PSR ranks 2nd and UTES 5th of 35 funds in the US Active Sector Category.
PSR vs UTES
PSR −0.14pt a year
0.35%0.49%
UTES 108.9×the volume
1.45K158K
UTES +6.2pt
+5.8%+12.0%
PSR vs UTES Performance
+5.1%+90.5%
- PSR 0.35%, better
- UTES 0.49%
- PSR $57M
- UTES $1.17B
- PSR +13.9%, better
- UTES −6.8%
- PSR 2.70%, better
- UTES 1.60%
- PSR 37
- UTES 19
- PSR 1.45K sh
- UTES 158K sh, better
- PSR $100.85
- UTES $76.69
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PSR | UTES |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A85Higher | A79 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B56Higher | D29 |
| Tradability | B58 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | B66Higher | D39 |
| Durability | A75 | A85Higher |
Rank among US Active Sector funds
Same Category. PSR and UTES are both graded against the same 35 US Active Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PSRA
UTESB
In short
PSR Active REIT stock-picking without the active price tag: since 2008, PSR has run a tight book of about 30 US property names for 0.35% a year, roughly half the median fee among active US equity ETFs.
UTES Utilities, but stock-picked. UTES has run an active, value-driven, bottom-up portfolio of electricity, gas and water companies since 2015, at a fee below what the typical active US equity ETF charges.
Stated mandate
PSR The Fund seeks high total return through capital appreciation and current income, investing principally in equity real estate investment trusts.
UTES The Fund seeks total return from capital appreciation and income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PSR vs UTES Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PSR vs UTES Cost
Overpaying UTES vs PSR
$2,666
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PSR 0.35%
$7,126
UTES 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PSR | UTES | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $883 | $249 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $3,394 | $940 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $9,792 | $2,666 |
- 0.35%PSR, cheaper
- 0.49%UTES
- Middle half of US Active Sector funds
- Median 0.61%
PSR 6th cheapest of 35 funds
UTES 8th cheapest of 35 funds
PSR vs UTES Dividends
- PSR 2.70%, better
- UTES 1.60%
- PSR $2.72
- UTES $1.23
- PSR $0.67
- UTES $0.26
- PSR Sep 21, 2026
- UTES Sep 21, 2026
- PSR Sep 25, 2026
- UTES Sep 28, 2026
- PSR Quarterly
- UTES Quarterly
Distribution history
PSR vs UTES Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PSR
- UTES
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PSR 16.5%, betterUTES 20.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- PSR 0.54UTES 0.96, better
- Worst fall
- PSR −34.8%UTES −20.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- PSR 0.95UTES 0.74
PSR and UTES in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


