Skip to content

PTLC vs PTNQ

Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF

PTLCACboe

Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF

PTNQBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

PTLC −0.05pt a year

PTLC0.60%PTNQ0.65%

Avg volume · 30D

PTLC 2.9×the volume

PTLC99.6KPTNQ34.5K

10Y return · a year

PTNQ +3.4pt

PTLC+11.2%PTNQ+14.6%

PTLC vs PTNQ Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+51.8%PTLC+47.7%PTNQ

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. PTLC +51.8%. PTNQ +47.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
PTLC 0.60%, better
PTNQ 0.65%
Fund size
PTLC $3.24B
PTNQ $1.17B
1Y total return
PTLC +5.8%, better
PTNQ +1.9%
Yield (12M)
PTLC 1.01%, better
PTNQ 0.84%
Holdings
PTLC 504
PTNQ 102
Avg volume (30D)
PTLC 99.6K sh, better
PTNQ 34.5K sh
NAV per share
PTLC $59.01
PTNQ $83.26
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PTLC: Cost 71, Risk 65, Mission 78, Tradability 100, Holdings 72, Durability 86. PTNQ: Cost 58, Risk 43, Mission not scored, Tradability 91, Holdings 58, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for PTLC, PTNQ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPTLCPTNQ
Cost30% weightA71HigherB58
Mission25% weightA78Not scored
Risk15% weightB65HigherC43
Tradability15% weightA100HigherA91
Holdings10% weightA72HigherB58
Durability5% weightA86HigherA79

Rank among Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PTLC and PTNQ are both graded against the same 20 Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 20 ›

PTLC ranks 2nd and PTNQ 7th of 20 funds in the Trend-Following / Tactical Index Category.

  1. Rank 1AWAMAWisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average FundScore 80
  2. Rank 2AONOFGlobal X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 2APTLCPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETFScore 76
  4. Rank 4APTMCPacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 6BQQWZPacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETFScore 63
  6. Rank 7BPTNQPacer Trendpilot 100 ETFScore 62
  7. Rank 8BLFEQVanEck Long/Flat Trend ETFScore 61

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PTLCAPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF

PTNQBPacer Trendpilot 100 ETF

In short

PTLC Most index funds ride out every drawdown. PTLC tracks an index with an exit ramp: a rules-based trend signal that shifts its large-cap exposure toward 3-month Treasury bills and back, with no manager judgment in the loop.

PTNQ The Nasdaq-100 with an automatic ejector seat: PTNQ holds the index while it sits above its 200-day average, then shifts half or all of the money into 3-month T-bills when the trend breaks. Rules decide, not a manager's gut.

Stated mandate

PTLC The Fund seeks to track the total return performance, before fees and expenses, of the Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap Index. That index uses a rules-based trend-following approach that alternates exposure between equities and 3-Month US Treasury bills.

PTNQ The fund seeks to track the total return of the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index before fees and expenses. Its rules-based trend-following strategy changes exposure among the NASDAQ-100 Index and 3-Month U.S. Treasury bills using three indicators.

Why people hold it

  • PTLC The switch is mechanical. A rules-based trend signal alternates exposure between US large-cap equities and 3-month Treasury bills, so nobody is making a gut call mid-panic.paceretfs.com
  • Underneath the signal sits plain large-cap America: roughly 500 stocks benchmarked to the S&P 500, not a niche factor slice.paceretfs.com
  • Trading since 2015 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, so the rules have run through live markets, not just backtests.
  • Among the index-tracking funds we cover, it lands in the upper half, and it follows its own index closely.
  • PTNQ Three states, all rules-based: all Nasdaq-100, 50/50 with 3-month T-bills, or all T-bills. Each switch needs five straight closes on the wrong side of the 200-day average.paceretfs.compaceretfs.com 2
  • No discretion, no gut calls. Pacer publishes the Trendpilot rules and the current position for the series, so you can see what moves the exposure and where it sits.paceretfs.compaceretfs.com 2
  • Live since 2015, so the rulebook has run through real market stress rather than a backtest, and it has grown into a multi-billion-dollar fund along the way.
  • At 0.65%, the fee sits right at the median for active US equity funds, so the signal machinery costs no premium over the typical active peer.

Worth knowing

  • PTLC 0.60% a year is real money next to vanilla large-cap trackers like SCHK (0.03%) or VOOV (0.07%). The trend rules are what the extra buys.
  • Trend signals read past prices. Moves into T-bills, or back into stocks, arrive after a market shift is already underway rather than ahead of it.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, so it isn't structured as a steady income drip.
  • PTNQ That 0.65% is still several times what plain core index funds charge (DFAU 0.12%, AVLC 0.15%). The rulebook is the thing you are paying for.
  • The 200-day signal lags by design. A sharp V-shaped rebound can catch it in T-bills, and it cannot go from all-T-bills back to 50/50 without first hitting the equity trigger.paceretfs.compaceretfs.com 2
  • It trades lighter than the largest Nasdaq-100 trackers, so spreads can run wider; limit orders are the usual fix. Payouts arrive annually or semiannually, not quarterly.

Full PTLC profile⁠

Full PTNQ profile⁠

PTLC vs PTNQ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PTLC vs PTNQ Cost

Overpaying PTNQ vs PTLC

$900

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PTLC 0.60%

    $11,817

  • PTNQ 0.65%

    $12,717

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PTLC 0.60%
  • PTNQ 0.65%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530PTNQ $12,717PTLC $11,817

Year by year

YearPTLCPTNQOverpaying
10$1,076$1,163$87
20$4,116$4,440$324
30$11,817$12,717$900

Expense ratio

  • 0.60%PTLC, cheaper
  • 0.65%PTNQ
  • Middle half of Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
  • Median 0.67%

PTLC 6th cheapest of 20 funds

PTNQ 8th cheapest of 20 funds

PTLC vs PTNQ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
PTLC 1.01%, better
PTNQ 0.84%
Payout (12M)
PTLC $0.59
PTNQ $0.69
Last payment
PTLC $0.59
PTNQ $0.69
Ex-dividend
PTLC Dec 30, 2025
PTNQ Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
PTLC Jan 5, 2026
PTNQ Jan 5, 2026
Frequency
PTLC Annual
PTNQ Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

PTLCAnnual · 9 paymentsAll PTLC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2017 $0.28; Dec 24, 2018 $0.29; Dec 24, 2019 $0.37; Dec 21, 2020 $0.35; Dec 23, 2021 $0.31; Dec 22, 2022 $0.47; Dec 27, 2023 $0.51; Dec 27, 2024 $0.36; Dec 30, 2025 $0.59. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
PTNQAnnual · 8 paymentsAll PTNQ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2017 $0.10; Dec 24, 2018 $0.15; Dec 24, 2019 $0.18; Dec 21, 2020 $0.08; Dec 22, 2022 $0.31; Dec 27, 2023 $0.96; Dec 27, 2024 $1.45; Dec 30, 2025 $0.69. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

PTLC vs PTNQ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • PTLC
  • PTNQ
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: PTNQ −18.5% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PTLC 11.7%, betterPTNQ 14.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PTLC 0.95, betterPTNQ 0.59
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PTLC −15.2%, betterPTNQ −18.5%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PTLC 0.87PTNQ 0.80

PTLC and PTNQ in the news

Popular comparisons

  • PTLCAvsWAMAA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF · WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTNQBvsWAMAA

    Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF · WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTLCAvsONOFA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF · Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTNQBvsONOFA

    Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF · Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTLCAvsPTMCA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTNQBvsPTMCA

    Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.