ONOF ranks 2nd and PTNQ 7th of 20 funds in the Trend-Following / Tactical Index Category.
ONOF vs PTNQ
ONOF −0.26pt a year
0.39%0.65%
PTNQ 5.9×the volume
5.82K34.5K
PTNQ +0.9pt
+7.2%+8.1%
ONOF vs PTNQ Performance
+41.3%+47.7%
- ONOF 0.39%, better
- PTNQ 0.65%
- ONOF $140M
- PTNQ $1.17B
- ONOF +7.1%, better
- PTNQ +1.9%
- ONOF 1.23%, better
- PTNQ 0.84%
- ONOF 503
- PTNQ 102
- ONOF 5.82K sh
- PTNQ 34.5K sh, better
- ONOF $40.37
- PTNQ $83.26
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ONOF | PTNQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | B58 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B62Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | B59 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | A76Higher | B58 |
| Durability | B56 | A79Higher |
Rank among Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
Same Category. ONOF and PTNQ are both graded against the same 20 Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ONOFA
PTNQB
In short
ONOF The ticker says it out loud: ONOF is an on/off switch. Four technical indicators decide whether it owns a broad basket of U.S. stocks or sits in short-term Treasuries. Rules, not hunches.
PTNQ The Nasdaq-100 with an automatic ejector seat: PTNQ holds the index while it sits above its 200-day average, then shifts half or all of the money into 3-month T-bills when the trend breaks. Rules decide, not a manager's gut.
Stated mandate
ONOF ONOF seeks to track the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index before fees and expenses. Its four technical indicators shift the Fund between U.S. equities and defensive short-term Treasuries.
PTNQ The fund seeks to track the total return of the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index before fees and expenses. Its rules-based trend-following strategy changes exposure among the NASDAQ-100 Index and 3-Month U.S. Treasury bills using three indicators.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ONOF vs PTNQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ONOF vs PTNQ Cost
Overpaying PTNQ vs ONOF
$4,819
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ONOF 0.39%
$7,898
PTNQ 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ONOF | PTNQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,163 | $458 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $4,440 | $1,715 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $12,717 | $4,819 |
- 0.39%ONOF, cheaper
- 0.65%PTNQ
- Middle half of Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
- Median 0.67%
ONOF 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
PTNQ 8th cheapest of 20 funds
ONOF vs PTNQ Dividends
- ONOF 1.23%, better
- PTNQ 0.84%
- ONOF $0.49
- PTNQ $0.69
- ONOF $0.16
- PTNQ $0.69
- ONOF Jun 29, 2026
- PTNQ Dec 30, 2025
- ONOF Jul 2, 2026
- PTNQ Jan 5, 2026
- ONOF Twice a year
- PTNQ Annual
Distribution history
ONOF vs PTNQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ONOF
- PTNQ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ONOF 12.0%, betterPTNQ 14.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- ONOF 0.82, betterPTNQ 0.59
- Worst fall
- ONOF −26.2%PTNQ −18.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ONOF 0.96PTNQ 0.80
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.