Skip to content

PTNQ vs WAMA

Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF

PTNQBNasdaq

WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund

WAMAANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

WAMA −0.32pt a year

PTNQ0.65%WAMA0.33%

Avg volume · 30D

PTNQ 2.8×the volume

PTNQ34.5KWAMA12.4K

PTNQ vs WAMA Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.2%PTNQ+1.3%WAMA

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. PTNQ +0.2%. WAMA +1.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.4%6%8%10%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PTNQ 0.65%
WAMA 0.33%, better
Fund size
PTNQ $1.17B
WAMA $199M
1Y total return
PTNQ +3.2%
WAMA No data
Yield (12M)
PTNQ 0.83%
WAMA No data
Holdings
PTNQ 102
WAMA 507
Avg volume (30D)
PTNQ 34.5K sh, better
WAMA 12.4K sh
NAV per share
PTNQ $83.26
WAMA $26.51
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PTNQ: Cost 58, Risk 42, Mission not scored, Tradability 91, Holdings 58, Durability 79. WAMA: Cost 100, Risk 84, Mission not scored, Tradability 54, Holdings 69, Durability 62.
Pillar letters and Scores for PTNQ, WAMA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPTNQWAMA
Cost30% weightB58A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC42A84Higher
Tradability15% weightA91HigherC54
Holdings10% weightB58B69Higher
Durability5% weightA79HigherB62

Rank among Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PTNQ and WAMA are both graded against the same 20 Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 20 ›

WAMA ranks 1st and PTNQ 7th of 20 funds in the Trend-Following / Tactical Index Category.

  1. Rank 1AWAMAWisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average FundScore 80
  2. Rank 2APTLCPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 6BQQWZPacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETFScore 63
  4. Rank 7BPTNQPacer Trendpilot 100 ETFScore 62
  5. Rank 8BLFEQVanEck Long/Flat Trend ETFScore 60

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PTNQBPacer Trendpilot 100 ETF

WAMAAWisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund

In short

PTNQ The Nasdaq-100 with an automatic ejector seat: PTNQ holds the index while it sits above its 200-day average, then shifts half or all of the money into 3-month T-bills when the trend breaks. Rules decide, not a manager's gut.

WAMA No data

Stated mandate

PTNQ The fund seeks to track the total return of the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index before fees and expenses. Its rules-based trend-following strategy changes exposure among the NASDAQ-100 Index and 3-Month U.S. Treasury bills using three indicators.

WAMA No data

Why people hold it

  • PTNQ Three states, all rules-based: all Nasdaq-100, 50/50 with 3-month T-bills, or all T-bills. Each switch needs five straight closes on the wrong side of the 200-day average.paceretfs.compaceretfs.com 2
  • No discretion, no gut calls. Pacer publishes the Trendpilot rules and the current position for the series, so you can see what moves the exposure and where it sits.paceretfs.compaceretfs.com 2
  • Live since 2015, so the rulebook has run through real market stress rather than a backtest, and it has grown into a multi-billion-dollar fund along the way.
  • At 0.65%, the fee sits right at the median for active US equity funds, so the signal machinery costs no premium over the typical active peer.

WAMA No data

Worth knowing

  • PTNQ That 0.65% is still several times what plain core index funds charge (DFAU 0.12%, AVLC 0.15%). The rulebook is the thing you are paying for.
  • The 200-day signal lags by design. A sharp V-shaped rebound can catch it in T-bills, and it cannot go from all-T-bills back to 50/50 without first hitting the equity trigger.paceretfs.compaceretfs.com 2
  • It trades lighter than the largest Nasdaq-100 trackers, so spreads can run wider; limit orders are the usual fix. Payouts arrive annually or semiannually, not quarterly.

WAMA No data

Full PTNQ profile⁠

Full WAMA profile⁠

PTNQ vs WAMA Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PTNQ vs WAMA Cost

Overpaying PTNQ vs WAMA

$5,980

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PTNQ 0.65%

    $12,717

  • WAMA 0.33%

    $6,737

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PTNQ 0.65%
  • WAMA 0.33%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530PTNQ $12,717WAMA $6,737

Year by year

YearPTNQWAMAOverpaying
10$1,163$598$565
20$4,440$2,318$2,122
30$12,717$6,737$5,980

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%PTNQ
  • 0.33%WAMA, cheaper
  • Middle half of Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
  • Median 0.67%

WAMA cheapest of 20 funds

PTNQ 8th cheapest of 20 funds

PTNQ vs WAMA Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
PTNQ 0.83%
WAMA No data
Payout (12M)
PTNQ $0.69
WAMA No data
Last payment
PTNQ $0.69
WAMA $0.05
Ex-dividend
PTNQ Dec 30, 2025
WAMA Sep 25, 2026
Paid on
PTNQ Jan 5, 2026
WAMA Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
PTNQ Annual
WAMA Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

PTNQAnnual · 8 paymentsAll PTNQ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2017 $0.10; Dec 24, 2018 $0.15; Dec 24, 2019 $0.18; Dec 21, 2020 $0.08; Dec 22, 2022 $0.31; Dec 27, 2023 $0.96; Dec 27, 2024 $1.45; Dec 30, 2025 $0.69. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
WAMAQuarterly · 2 paymentsAll WAMA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 25, 2026 $0.11; Sep 25, 2026 $0.05. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

PTNQ vs WAMA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PTNQ 14.2%WAMA No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PTNQ 0.59WAMA No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PTNQ −18.5%WAMA No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PTNQ 0.80WAMA 0.59

Popular comparisons

  • PTNQBvsPTLCA

    Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WAMAAvsPTLCA

    WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund · Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.33% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTNQBvsONOFA

    Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF · Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WAMAAvsONOFA

    WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund · Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.33% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTNQBvsPTMCA

    Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WAMAAvsPTMCA

    WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund · Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.33% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.