SCMB ranks 4th and PZA 17th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
PZA vs SCMB
SCMB −0.25pt a year
0.28%0.03%
SCMB 1.2×the volume
2.63M3.28M
SCMB +0.2pt
+3.5%+3.7%
PZA vs SCMB Performance
−1.8%−0.5%
- PZA 0.28%
- SCMB 0.03%, better
- PZA $4.11B
- SCMB $4.07B
- PZA −1.8%
- SCMB −0.5%, better
- PZA 4.01%, better
- SCMB 3.97%
- PZA 7357
- SCMB 8205
- PZA 2.63M sh
- SCMB 3.28M sh, better
- PZA $22.15
- SCMB $24.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PZA | SCMB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B60 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A94 | A96Higher |
| Risk | D30 | C46Higher |
| Tradability | A72 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | A85Higher | A81 |
| Durability | A87Higher | A72 |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. PZA and SCMB are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PZAB
SCMBA
In short
PZA Most muni ETFs hand you the whole yield curve. PZA goes long on purpose: its index only takes bonds with at least 15 years left to maturity, all screened to stay out of the alternative minimum tax. Income lands monthly.
SCMB Schwab's take on the core muni sleeve: three basis points, thousands of AMT-free bonds from across the country, and a monthly distribution. Bottom-of-the-table pricing, no frills attached.
Stated mandate
PZA The fund seeks to track an index of tax-exempt municipal debt that is not subject to the alternative minimum tax.
SCMB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of an index representing the U.S. AMT-free municipal bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PZA vs SCMB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PZA vs SCMB Cost
Overpaying PZA vs SCMB
$5,117
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PZA 0.28%
$5,755
SCMB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PZA | SCMB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $509 | $55 | $454 |
| 20 | $1,976 | $216 | $1,760 |
| 30 | $5,755 | $638 | $5,117 |
- 0.28%PZA
- 0.03%SCMB, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
SCMB cheapest of 63 funds
PZA 24th cheapest of 63 funds
PZA vs SCMB Dividends
- PZA 4.01%, better
- SCMB 3.97%
- PZA $0.88
- SCMB $0.98
- PZA $0.08
- SCMB $0.07
- PZA Oct 19, 2026
- SCMB Nov 2, 2026
- PZA Oct 23, 2026
- SCMB Pays Nov 6, 2026
- PZA Monthly
- SCMB Monthly
Distribution history
PZA vs SCMB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PZA 7.8%SCMB 5.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PZA −0.03, betterSCMB −0.04
- Worst fall
- PZA −18.3%SCMB −6.7%
- Market sensitivity
- PZA 1.29SCMB 0.96
Popular comparisons
- 0.28% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.